xmurderx

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wardog @ Dec. 01 2002,04:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MAsta_KFC @ Nov. 30 2002,06:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just a question. Right now as I see it, the Tunguska doesn't fire at enemy MBTs. The question is, in real life, if the MBT was the primary threat, wouldn't the crew at least fire at it in defence? Right now, the Tunguska just sits there like a duck and waits to be destroyed. Granted, I doubt there would be times where you'd find a single Tunguska vs an Abrams, but still..? Otherwise an excellent vehicle. Keep up the good work! Â <span id='postcolor'> Because in real life, the only thing the Tunguska could really do to ANY MBT, not just Abrams is annoy the crew by chipping off the paint. Or run away. It's an anti-aircraft point defence vehicle. It protects tanks from aircraft, the tanks protect it from other tanks. It's an old argument. rather than re-starting it, why not just use search to see what has been said in the past?<span id='postcolor'> it would be neat if somehow it was scripted into the addon that when it was approched by an enemy tank it would start to run away. or take cover or something. just a thought

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Gollum1 @ Nov. 30 2002,12:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (xmurderx @ Nov. 30 2002,09:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I didnt like it but my actions alone wont turn the tide of the vote.<span id='postcolor'> Who knows? The last election in the U.S turned out to hang on a few hundred votes. Maybe YOUR vote is the vote that tips the scale, eh? That´s how democracy works.<span id='postcolor'> maybe it will

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Nov. 30 2002,07:00)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (xmurderx @ Nov. 30 2002,06:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Nov. 30 2002,04:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote  BTW: Republican Senate + Republican Congress + Republican President = Totalitarian Government.  Bush and cronies can pretty much do whatever the hell they want, and without a new American Revolution, there really isnt a damn thing that can be done to stop them.  Think about it. Like it or not, that's what Americans voted for. We have complete control over who we want in power- at the moment America prefers the Republicans. You might think that's a bad thing, but the fact is that America gets to decide who leads America, not Europe, Canada, or the UN. But anyways, this is completely offtopic.<span id='postcolor'> ummm, there are alot of americans who can disagree with what was "voted". one word, florida.<span id='postcolor'> Sheesh. Give it up. I think Bush is a moron, but for every american that thinks Bush 'stole' the Presidency with Florida, there is an American that would feel exactly the same way if it had gone to Gore.  For every half baked conspiracy about why Bush won, there would be one about why Gore won. If you dont like what happened..then get more people out to vote next time.<span id='postcolor'> then get more people out to vote?!? goodness, what a thing to say I didnt like it but my actions alone wont turn the tide of the vote.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Nov. 30 2002,04:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote BTW: Republican Senate + Republican Congress + Republican President = Totalitarian Government. Bush and cronies can pretty much do whatever the hell they want, and without a new American Revolution, there really isnt a damn thing that can be done to stop them. Think about it. Like it or not, that's what Americans voted for. We have complete control over who we want in power- at the moment America prefers the Republicans. You might think that's a bad thing, but the fact is that America gets to decide who leads America, not Europe, Canada, or the UN. But anyways, this is completely offtopic.<span id='postcolor'> ummm, there are alot of americans who can disagree with what was "voted". one word, florida.

is it possible to add some ingame info, as in, what the addon would be called in the editor? this would help alot as some of the addons are named very weird. the comment feature is good, but Iam sure there are alot of us out there who forget whats what.

I cannot find this addon anywhere

very cute

you people make me sad first off he said he found it in some guys mission, why doesnt anyone here so intent on bringing him down download it and prove him wrong? secondly you can tell its not a fake picture, this is already proven. third, it doesnt seem like english is his primary language, so dont be so harsh if he says "First my thread have dissapeared. Maybe admins know what is going on ? " this could be an implication of " hey admins, do you know whats going on?"

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MotherRussiaAK74 @ Nov. 03 2002,08:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Rebels aren't terrorists. The people who took those hostages are.<span id='postcolor'> Iam sure 99.9% of rebels are more than willing to have a hostage, so shall we call rebels terrorist of the future?

hi, Iam over 400mbs of addons in my addons folder and I would like to get rid of the ones I dont want, the problem is that some of them arent exactly named what I understand. for example I found out the ww2 army pack was called u1.pbo, not exactly helpful. so I was wondering if someone could make a (or point me out to one) program that will read my addons, tell me the file name, and the ingame name. I think this kind of program would be very helpful. thank you. any imput?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Papageorge @ Oct. 31 2002,19:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Damn you Mister Frag! I' am so friggen hungry for MRE's right now. But I think i'll chow down on a powerbar and go for a run to stop thinking about more food. I' am touchy! lol. If you only knew me better you'd understand why that is funny to me. But seriously now, I' am 'touchy' when I get anouyed by stupid people being stupid. (Yeah figure, lol) And denoir Moderator or not, sometimes you just piss me off with your opinions. Shouldn't let them, but they do. MRE's are made with really one thing in mind. Packing as much power into a bag that will last a long time. Taste comes second. Maybe you just can't serve the MRE's right or something. You can do alot with those air-tight bags of fun.<span id='postcolor'> if your so rich why arent you out playing polo? anyways, back on topic, as a kid I loved mres, my dad would bring them back from the feild and my brother and I would fight over the candy they had in there. also recently, (dont know if the old ones had this) but there is a heating pad in there that is activated by water, I thought that was the coolest thing ever.

I just think it would be likely for bis to create a tool like this, they released oxygen, why not something to help organize what you make? I know bis probley doesnt have the time for something like this, but I just think it would be nice. no pressure*, just nice. *-sure the petition is contradicting to this statement, so forget I said anything about it.

maybe something of this scale would take the work of bis? maybe we should petition for it or request it? if not maybe some talented programer could? ideas? suggestions?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (N.o.R.S.u @ Oct. 31 2002,14:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MadWolf @ Oct. 31 2002,120)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The only way to use tow on jeeps, i think that is by making it a mg... No tows coming out the tow launcher... just tracers...<span id='postcolor'> Has anybody tried making the car as tank? Just leave the tracks away and you have a car that has wheels which won't turn. But you can still use missiles properly which is IMO much more important...<span id='postcolor'> I think the realism level for the vehical would be droped dramaticly. the "car" would turn like a tank, something not possible in common cars. which would make for very unfair advantages.

ibm is offering busnissess laptops now that have fingerprint recognizion and even global tracking so that when its stolen it would be found. if this thing was THAT secret wouldnt it have been found by now? the us army isnt that dumb

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PFC_Mike @ Oct. 27 2002,17:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">yeah, looking at the pictures it looked awfully small, but I didn't think it would be a solotrek becuase thy weren't around in 85. or 95 either. I dunno, maybe some people will enjoy this more than others.<span id='postcolor'> if you look at it that way there are a ton of addons you wont be using.(because of the fact that alot of addons are post 85) Â

ok, when I make female 1 under control of a western soldier she has brownish hair. when I put her down without a leader, OR with a civilian leader she has black hair. I want her to be on the side of the west but also for her to have black her. bassicly I want her to be ada (in the faces select menu). I have tried to maker her join, and or join and lead, but then eastern forces wont shoot her. ahhhhh, please help, I have requested this help before but nothing came up.

I care because its mission specific, kinda like why they chose to keep victors face in the game his, and not changeable by the user. also yes this was disscussed before, I brought it up a long time ago but no one ever came up with a result, I thought since then maybe someone has come up with something.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (The Sharpshooter @ Oct. 24 2002,23:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Look into Munger´s signature and you´ll find the link.<span id='postcolor'> doh *slaps self*

can someone please provide the link to battlesounds 1.1?

I wouldnt be surprised if most of you didnt know who I liked: the faint belle and sabastian (maybe you british folk might) pizzicato five the locust no knife cursive planes mistaken for stars etc......

Iam geussing the spinning barrels are new to 1.85? because my vulcan's barrel spins now, and it used to not. how nice

since so many people are too lazy to read the damn readme that comes with the file I will do a mini review pros: it looks great, handles good, ai flys it like a charm cons: cockpit textures are bad, cant retract gear, no shadow, enemy planes wont fire on it, enemy anti air units wont fire on it, handles *too* smoothly, it kinda jumps every now and then when its parked. it looks very very good and its very very large. I appluad the author of this and hopes the minior bugs will be cleared up in the future.

kind of like a plane follows the airport paths, or how cars drive on roads, why wouldnt a train work on specialy designeted "tracks", maybe addedd when making a map?

maybe it is a terrorist maybe they know if a terrorist organization claimed credit for it the military would have to step in terrorist are very smart people and 10 times out of 10 know what they are doing.