Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

scottw

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    38

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by scottw

  2. Posted

    It created the profile automatically for me in the profile list as soon as I rename the .exe it appeared there, it appears as crysis.exe with the ArmA2 logo, if your running on Vista/7 might be worth putting the -winxp switch in your shortcut, Im on 7 and havent needed to do that. Have you tried running ArmAMark, also In some of the MP games I noticed I was stuck around 32fps but the game that I was joining had been updated and I was getting a lot more fps, so could also be something to do with the map was made in the editor?

  3. Posted

    What TIPS in this thread?

    I have tried the AFR 1/2 and no diff still get 25-30 fps on a bleeding edge PC. This trick was insinuated too..

    Changing to AFR2 gave me around a 2fps increase, however renaming the ArmA2.exe to crysis.exe gave me a massive increase, give that a go if you havent already.

  4. Posted

    I just re-run HD Tach and Avg Read time was 220Mb/s im running an OCZ Vertex, ive got two but im not running them in raid at the moment but raid0 gives me around 480Mb/s, unfortunately I dont have another drive sitting around that isnt filled with data so I cant really test to see if there is any difference for you :(

  5. Posted

    Yeah I think HDD would normally be a limiting factor, but im running SSD's and with literally no seek time I wouldnt have thought they might be the issue, I am getting a little low on space though and the performance does start to degrage when you get a little low on them, so think a clean up and a TRIM is in order, see if there are any benefits, might finally uninstall ArmA :)

  6. Posted

    Sorry if a thread has already been posted but I couldnt find one, but is anyone else noticing a big difference in FPS between SP and MP, say for example load up on of the scenarios im getting around 50-60fps, but any MP game I join I seem to be capped around 30-32fps, seems really odd like somethings limiting it? Anyone noticed this too?

  8. Posted

    Just realised people wanted it set to normal so I re-run it.

    Same spec as before but no settings were:

    Fill Rate : 100%

    Textures Details : Normal

    Video Memory : Normal

    Aniso : Normal

    Terrain Detail : Normal

    Objects Detail : Normal

    Shadow Details : Normal

    PostProcessing effects : Low

    Score was 5407

  9. Posted

    Fill Rate - 100%

    Viewing Distance - 3045

    Texture Detail - Very High

    Anisotropic Filtering - Very High

    Terrain Detail - High

    Objects Detail - Normal

    Shadow Detail - High

    PostProcess Effects- Very High

    Cpu - I7 940 (3.8Ghz)

    Ram - Cell Shock 6GB

    GPU - GTX280 SLI

    OS - Windows 7

    Resolution - 1920 x 1200

    Normal Score - 4919

  11. Posted · Edited by scottw

    Are you running Windows7, I as getting the strange flickering in that, but under XP I havent had it yet, AFR2 was definitley the best one to use but, after doing some benchmarks a little while ago I was only really seeing about 3-5 frame difference. The wierd thing is as well when running SLI you cant run triple buffering and V-sync but it appears that it is running so im not sure SLI is actually working correctly. Is it official supported in ArmA2, I read some places saying it was some saying it wasnt so im still not sure?

    Ok Just saw this thread http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?t=73470 and renaming the .exe to crysis got it running perfectly bang on 60fps now, so much better!

×