PuFu

You for real dude?

Mykes approach works with lean left and right just as well afaik.

No, i missed nothing. Judging by the way you put it, seems only CM has that potential, which is NOT true: every other developer out there has the same "potential" atm as CM. From where i am standing, CM has not advantage besides owning the brandname. Looking over what games are developed now, you could easily state (without someone contradicting over the potent part) that Activision, or EA or Dice have the potential to create the true successor of OFP. And you would be true there (as in they have the money, they have the manpower, the technology etc), but we all know that won't happen due to a number of reasons, the main one being the target audience and the hardware limitation of its said target You should really get over the DR episode. It is old, it is dead, and, for most of the real OFP fans, it was a big fail.

I feel the rule is worthwhile especially for cases where there is a thread about whatever subject, and 1 year later, somebody post there saying: hey, is there any news? (in fact this sort of mindless bumping should be slapped no matter if we are talking about an old thread or not - my own 2 cents) Same goes for discussions about a subject which have been either fixed or is not really of importance anymore.

vilas: 1. 99% of the issued weapons have no sights/scopes attached to them. The very few that have are using the following rails you can see here: http://www.avtomats-in-action.com/pro19.html 2. There is already a 5.56 PM available, but is is NOT standard issue weapon, in fact i am not sure who or if anyone is using it :http://www.arms.home.ro/arms/cugir1/pag/3.html

at least the first release that is^^

Oh my GOD! I see it now: Myke is always right :P

then try with just a simple box, the size of the vehicle

Geo LOD doesn't need to be that complex. (as LOD 0) Try with a simple shaped box, where every vertice is welded, convex, hard edged

so i guess you hit the mood :) nicely done topas.

I doubt it since, in practice, that would mean you would need to adjust the animation speed defined in a .cfg on the fly.

Really? How so? JUst because they have the financial resources? In that case every bid developer out there has the same potential, if not a even a better chance that CM (because everyone else might base they work on a proper engine, and are not capped by a previous wannabe failed game) Told you before Ben, you are one of those very naive persons out there, one that doesn't even believe himself at times, but nevertheless he forces himself to think some way because he is restricted by a certain view on things, if not the hardware limit. WHo is the target audience for CM? Same as every major mainstream developer out there minus Valve: Consoles. Bear in mind that from the boxes sold by COD6, only 4% were on PCs. 4%! When you aim low (consoles - a restricted platform in terms of hardware, as well as features available to the endplayer (through limited input devices, outside hardware needed -or lack of- for setting up games in a MP environment), you will NEVER be able to accomplish a complex scope video game, no matter how well gifted your team might be

Obviusly I might have a go at it, depends on the mood. Anyhow, it is not a high priority

I agree with that completely. Additionally, you could use one of the HD models on commercial 3d websites to bake the normals, but taking it down to LP (at least on a mesh you haven't built yourself) is not an easy task

I have a finished M3P (based on the M2) if that helps: http://www.army.mil/-images/2009/04/06/34474/size0-army.mil-34474-2009-04-08-060424.jpg

That is the first i have seen. The ones i have seen around the shows, expos and what not had the solid buttstock. I guess that would be the romanian version of the RPKS then, but i don't know who is actually using it (paratroopers, maybe) muzzle break for PMis is this one: http://tantal.kalashnikov.guns.ru/variant/brake_smooth_two_piece2.jpg

I posted that entire list so you won't check it topas? bad bad boy :P Already had a talk with SA yesterday, and since the decals exist (in form, they need to be colored), all it needs are new textures so it can be packed in the next update. That way you will have everything needed in the RHS BTR70 pack, you won't even need permission, just reference it @vilas: only the PMis have that specific stock, and the fronggrip with the handle. The RPK and PKM familly are exactly as russian counterparts

not really, tanks for instance don't have modeled interiors.

List of Romanian Military Vehicles and Weapon Systems NOTES: italic entries are currently deployed in Afghanistan/Iraq (at least to my knowledge) 1. L A N D _V E H I C L E S SOFT WHEELED VEHICLES: * ARO 244D * Land Rover Defender (used only by MP) * Humvee M-1113 * Humvee M-1114 * URO Vamtac * DAC 665/15.240/16.230 Truck * ROMAN 26.410 Truck ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIERS: * BRDM-2 9P133 * MLI-84M (based on BMP1) * MOWAG Piranha III C * TAB 77M (based on BTR-70) * TABC-79 (4x4 version of TAB 77) * B-33 Zimbru (based on BTR 80) MAIN BATTLE TANKS: * TR-85M1 Bison * T72 (reserve) * T55 (training) AAA VEHICLES: * 9K33M3 OSA-AKM (SA-8) * 2K12 KUB (SA-6) * Flakpanzer GEPARD MOBILE ARTILLERY: * CA-95M (based on TABC-79) * LAROM/APR-40 MLRS (on DAC 665 chaissis or ROMAN 26.410 DFAES) 2. A I R _V E H I C L E S FIGHTER VEHICLES: * MIG 21 LanceR * MIG 29K * F16C/F16E * IAR 99 Soim (Aero L39) * IAR 330 Puma SOCAT (improved avionics) TRANSPORT VEHICLES: * AN 22 * AN 26 * AN 30 * C 130 HERCULES * C27J SPARTAN 3. I N F A N T R Y _W E A P O N S: SIDEARMS: * Pistol md.2000 (based on Jericho 941) * Glock 17 SUBMACHINE-GUNS: * HK MP5 (SF ops) * HK UMP9 (SF ops) RIFLES * PA md.86 / AIMS74 (AK74) - standar issued rifle * HK G36C (SF ops) * SIG 551 LN (SF ops) * Steyr AUG (SF ops) MACHINE-GUNS * PM md.64 (RPK) * PM md.93 (RPK-74) * M md.66 (PKM) SNIPER RIFLES * PSL (SVD) * KH PSG1 (SF ops) * Brugger&Thomet APR (SF ops) AT/AA WEAPON SYSTEMS * AG-7 (RPG 7) * AG-9 (SPG-9) * CA-94 (Strela2) Further reading: List of Romanian Land Forces - Wiki Romanian Land Forces - Wiki Romanian Air Forces - Wiki F16 Fighting Falcon Purchase - Ro Wiki AIMS74 - Tantal Roman/DAC Military Vehicles Romanian Armed Forces - Military Photos Thread

Don't mind the ones that have no real idea what you really talking about.. While true about the ingame shadow settings (low would use CPU for rendering shadows, while above settings will force GPU to render those (softshadows included), what you want, change the map size from the (most likely 512/512) to a smaller size might be possible using an external .dll file (armalib), but i am not aware of such setting being available to edit in any of arma .cfg or other files. If you want more information about it, i suggest you contact one developers (dwarden for instance).

ask dwarden. maybe he ca help get the unbinned RTM...maybe

Yes, TAB 79 is still in use, although i am uncertain about its deployment in Iraq. Anyhow, tab 77 is a modified version of the btr 70 (cough). I would gladly model a DAC/Roman vehicle...it remains to be seen, since i really really wanna finish the other projects i have in different WIP stages, including the ones for RHS.

finally another romanian besides me ! was actually wondering not long ago how much it would take for something like this to pop. looking forward to it! let me know if i can be of any assistance in the development (la acest mod lucrezi doar tu, o echipa sau..? pot fi contactat pe skype in cazul in care vreti un pic de ajutor)

as long as you take credit for the purchase, and not for making the model, i guess it is

here is THE THREAD you should be posting in anyhow. those are the FORUM RULES PS:get the AMD X6