Jump to content

PuFu

Member
  • Content Count

    8937
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

  • Medals

Everything posted by PuFu

  1. you are running a mod that changes the system to their own, the vanilla behavior has nothing to do with any 3rd party mods... EDIT: ninjaed
  2. where did you see any measuring value next to any mass values in game? be it Kgs, Gs, LBs etc? the value is 40 or 80 or whatever, how did you figure out it is in Kgs? edit- if i make a fishing rod and wanna make sure that only fits in very large backpacks due to the size, not the weight of it, will stick a large mass config value to it, same goes for any other object ingame.
  3. good grief. yeah i use metric system as well, but Arma doesn't. The mass value in the configs is a mix of weight and size, and that surely isn't measured in KGs. Do learn to read.
  4. except in arma the weight is not measured in KGs
  5. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    yeah never actually believe @mistyronin ;) there were some small attempts done, all i can say that there is no current active development on it afaik.
  6. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    we don't really scrap all that many models, not to my knowledge. it is dormant on @gurdy's HDD afaik, he had some random WW2 bug and/or he had enough of doing murican stuff for a bit ;)
  7. By no means i think that copyright is something that should be infringed on, but in your case i find it completly stupid on their part, so here's my other 2 cents besides what rob posted above and what i wrote before a. BI has nothing to do with 3rd party content licensing or IP infringements. They can report that IP breach to BI as long as they want to, BI is NOT responsible in any way for 3rd party content that is being made. b. The stance you should took is not one of asking them for permission - can you pretty please let me release it, look what i have done in order not to breach your IP rights, bur rather one of informing them that you took certain steps (trademarks, brands etc removal), and you will move forward with your release. It is up to them to reply to these emails to begin with, you have no obligation to change your schedule based on their lack of replies. c. They have to build a "case" that would show that your 3d mesh is a reproduction. It isn't, it is an artistic interpretation (the 10-15% remix thing is something that does indeed apply, but for most 3d meshes, i think that it is already obvious that your parts are not 1:1 replicas of the real thing, especially since you modeled that MRAP based on photos and not on diagrams and other CAD data). Do understand that, like it is with lawyers they are playing a preemptive strong hand just because. There is no legal grounds, whatsoever, to have the content you are making (again, very important that it is non-commercial here, as rob said, attach a license to it to state just that) removed from anywhere. I would also add a disclaimer along these lines "I am not associated with Nexter and/or Tatra companies. Any resemblance to any real product is circumstantial"
  8. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    pretty sure everyone in RHS got their feelings hurt and are sobbing in some corners. crybabies indeed. maybe it is time you actually read the FAQ http://www.rhsmods.org/faq have you ever considered it is actually ignored on purpose, trying to keep away from politics and/or as a sign of respect for the ones that lost their lives in that idiotic conflict started by a bunch of spineless wankers? or that stance is irrelevant/ above your comprehension for you? for Nth time, if this particular conflict feels so important to you, why don't you create the content missing yourself, instead of expecting others to do that for you. have you seen RHS making any scenario or campaign of any sorts to portray such a war (US-RU)? You can use AFRF without using USAF just as you can use just USAF without AFRF, right? fucking "sad" trumpism is overused...So it is "sad" that 3rd party developers are passionate about whatever they are doing in their own freaking free time now? 1. because the largest teams of modders are all living in the same country and have the same nationality, right? (scroll all the way down and check that world globe - http://www.rhsmods.org/team) 2. why don't you keep these believes to yourself and stop trying to manage how other people are spending their hobby time, ok? To conclude: a. you are actually wasting both your time and mine here, all you managed to achieve is to irritate me on a very personal level b. we are not gonna change how/what other people are doing with their mods c. RHS does not take requests, of any kind, from anyone. Now, for everyone else, thanks for standing up for us, but it surely isn't needed. Let's try and steer back on topic of this thread please.
  9. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    what sucks if you don't mind me asking? RHS scope surely isn't either the Iraqi nor the Syrians conflicts. Also, as you might know, we don't take requests, but there is a thread on these forums just for that: the crossed fingers will still not help. better to uncross these and use them to type in a report here: feedback.rhsmods.org we don't "add vehicles", we create 3d models of these vehicles. The only "added" vehicles outside the ones made from scratch by/for RHS were some of BIS A2 models that we considered relevant and sufficient accurate and that we have modified further for our needs. lol what? so it is sad that we do value Intellectual Property rights of content creators? I am pretty sure i have replied to you on this subject before - you are free to go ahead and create your own t-55 / t-62 / t-64 tank(s) 3d models anytime you like. Will any of us within RHS ever gonna do such a tank? As with everything, the answer is MAYBE, but it is at the sole discretion of our 3d artists, overall neither of these tanks are considered a priority by anyone but yourself, and in that case, see one paragraph above.
  10. relevand discussion and articles https://support.turbosquid.com/hc/en-us/articles/230097027-Copyright-Basics https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/3d-digitisation-and-intellectual-property-rights https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/15/evaluating-ip-infringement-risks-for-designers-and-consumers-of-3d-printing-services/?guccounter=1 EDIT: What i would do if i were you: a. consult with a relevant knowledgeable IP lawyer b. considering a 3d model is a representation of a product, and it isn't the product (just like a photo of that product is not owned by either the subject's manufacturer, or the camera manufacturer the photo was taken with) i doubt they can legally do much about it. c. i would remove all the brands/trademarks just in case, unless you did the model based on their inhouse CAD data, your own version is an artistic interpretation, not even a reproduction, much less a 1:1 copy d. i would contact them saying that you will release it and i would release it, as there is no money involved either way, there is afaik, from a legal pov, nothing they can do about it
  11. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    you can uncross these fingers, it surely is not going to help, and pretty sure it can get uncomfortable after a while
  12. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    hmmm, weirdly you act as if you and me are tight friends and you actually know me... let me straighten this up for you: http://www.rhsmods.org/faq#1 but not the ones used in that image the bloke posted, or so i am being told by people who know more about humves than i ever will.
  13. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    up-armored have priority hope i have been confusing enough ;)
  14. the HUDs are all WIP. for other stuff, might wanna fill some reports on feedback.rhsmods.org
  15. actually the HINDs in RHS are from both A2 and TOH (AFRF and GREF). RWR, changeable pylon loadouts, sling loading etc is all available.
  16. ahh, my bad, did read "worn like" part = "just as" glasses, hats, vest etc. Yes, having gloves as a helmet or face accessory is doable
  17. PuFu

    Arma 3 Launcher Feature Request : Mod Notes

    open a notepad or google docs file and write this down?
  18. PuFu

    UV Editor load error

    in your path name is your problem
  19. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    ...especially since we are using tech available only on the dev/RC branch that is bound to be released with this encore DLC update, even if we wanted, we have no other option but to wait on BI to release that update on their end first
  20. PuFu

    Retexturing RHS uniform

    it doesn't matter if you share them or not, the EULA still stands, so i suggest you actually read it: http://www.rhsmods.org/page/EULA#re-textures
  21. PuFu

    RHS Escalation (AFRF and USAF)

    a bit of shameless self promo. Ty for everyone who took apart their guns to send me pics, will have you mentioned by name in facebook as soon as i bake this down
  22. :D very true, especially since the set i have planned is gonna be RHS exclusive. So bring it on ;) EDIT, do let me know if you need specific refs for any parts
  23. oh shoot, i'm working on the exact same thing :P
×