MontyVCB

im not at liberty to say

I woulden't be so sure I just saw the latest and greatest for VBS which includes multible firepositions(more guns mounted on virchles. and you can fire out of virchles with you own handgun, it also has gotten destroyable buildings, more advanced fatigure model and more advanced AI. And I surtanly hope OFP2 will be "like" OFP1. But I agree VBS has meant that some of the thinges that could have made OFP even better now is lost to the VBS elite.(its a good thing VBS is only 5km away for me, thank god for crazy friends) STGN i would like to add to that, its no config made to get around limitations, the new changes are HARD coded from what i have been told.... these new features work in a different way than the ways other addon makers have done to get more than one gunner etc

thats cool man

they don't have to explain anything, its none of our buisness if they want to do stuff for vbs....

nice...

excuse vbs junk? asa member of the VBS comunity, don't say stuff about you don't know

manhunter-ox u crazy man, calm down

lookin nice jag mate

its quite hard to get a helicopter thats not even production 100% right, the thing changed some many times over the last couple of years, its unfair to say it could of been better.....

is it me or can i not see the difference? Â

the model looks more like its based of the BIS model rather than the POE one, dunno bout the textures, but hey the guy has been working on it for less than a week, if they are POE's textures they maybe temp ones Â

i don't think they did screw up the timeline, they just went back and did jack ryan as a young man, in SoaF he had'nt gotten married yet, or had kids, plus i think the guy who played clark did it it really well Â

i second that! great book

im waiting for the new starwars RTS, you get to control super star destroyers , it should be good, its got some of the guys who had a hand in command and conquer

lol! internet1 and interent2! sounds like low budget B movies to me  , tho it does sound interesting Â

nice work , been waiting for KA-52 "Alligator" for a while now

no mate, the one by NZX has hellfires, not TOW launchers, also the gattling gun is different to, its a vbs model, no doubt about it ADF 105mm arty pieces

By private, you mean the VBS pilot and AH-1W models you have gotten hold of from somewhere? , care to explain? VBS AH-1W

i can see why ace is slightly offened, but then agian i don't see anything wrong with it aslong as the story line is well thought out and beleavable, what you have posted so far is very vague and some people would see it as border line racist....

thats a good site, has some very useful infomation in there

could'nt aggree more, nearly all mentioned don't need editing at all

i very much doubt it, the Abrams out classes the T-72 in every aspect. firepower, protection, speed, mobility etc

how you can even compare a T-72 to a M1A1 or M1A2 is laughable, just beacuse  a tank has a bigger gun does not mean its better  , this is not WW2, when the shell leaves the barrel of a tank its a mere metal spike with fins, i don't think 5mm is going to make much difference. not to mention the tank crews in the iraqi army were poorly trained compared to the crew of a US tank.  you also seem to forget the M1A2 and A2 can destroy targets from up to 3 miles away, while moving, the T-72 can't Â

thats a good point, no one is going to listen to us, so why is there a point in discussing it?

ok, so if its so dangerous what do we replace it with? some one has already said that tungsten is not much better, and is still poisonous if breathed in or swallowed  , DU rounds will be around for a while yet, the advantages from a military point of view outweigh the risks