nordin dk

12: You go back to deactivate a useless satchel and it blows up in your face, just as you crouch down.

I think it is very frustrating...

Apparently not, since it's being misinterpreted and twisted around. I don't necessarily agree with your opinion, but that doesn't mean I should just accuse you of having a bias towards my country. That is the sort of attitude that causes problems, more than anything else in the world.

Is that all you can say?

He didn't for christs sake!! He might as well have used a Danish, German, Japanese, Nepalese, Congolese, Samoan person for that story.... It would have made no difference to the morale of the story. If it is the morale of the story, or the injustice of the world that you do not agree with, then say so. Why do you take it so personally? If you simply insist that he hates your country no matter what, then you have really really big problems. Don't make an enemy out of him, when he is not. Sheesh, what's next...are you going to accuse me of bashing your country now?

9: Make a run for the flag, without checking your ammo status.

8: Stand behind a tree with LAW armed and ready, when the BMP arrives you follow it in your scope and fire! just at the right time, when you are actually pointing the LAW right into the trunk of the tree. Boom, you are dead. (guess who did this )

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">you want a definition of the line? here you go: If you take another human beings life intentionally, you have forfeited your right to live yourself. <span id='postcolor'> So the executioner should himself be killed? </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">thats what a court of law is for: to establish whether or not the killing was intentional. Im not advocating summary executions; any ruling involving the death penalty should not be taken lightly.<span id='postcolor'> I don't think they are taken lightly, but mistakes are made nonetheless. The court cannot determine whether or not the accused actually comitted the crime, only if the evidence suggests it. Would you want to die for a crime you did not commit, or a murder you did not intend to commit? Would you think it fair if your father was "humanely" executed for example? Just a simple stab with a needle, and he sees nice colors and then it's aaaalright....you can go home now, and you can tell your children what a wonderful world it is we live in, where the governement is allowed to kill people.

Hej Espectro, jeg tror ikke der er noget der hedder vupti pĺ engelsk

In a way it's like Vegas. There will always be cheaters, no matter how tight the security is. I could understand why someone would want to cheat to win thousands of $, but in a game like Operation Flashpoint, it doesn't make sense to me. I guess these people are "slow".

You go to a disco, somebody puts something in your drink, it's a really bad trip. You see someone talking to your gf, and you freak out and strangle him. Perhaps IRL, you never tried anything stronger than rootbeer, but you have a lot of aggresion that is suddenly unleashed when you are accidently inlfluenced by drugs. And you were so determined, all witnesses agree to that, and you didn't seem that high...and didn't you know this guy from before...and didn't you used to joke about that if he touched your gf, you would f*cking kick his ass? And weren't you arrested once for being in a fight? etc. etc. Do you deserve the deathpenalty? That depends only on how skillfull the prosecutor is.

What do you think causes the biggest problems?

You have defined your moral standards, but not the physical act itself. How can you be sure that the accused didn't intend it to be a warning shot, but he happened to hit the drugstoreclerk in the head instead? To give one example...

As should the infamous Impact donkey!

Put it any way you want... ...it doesn't change anything. Explain to me the exact border...the split hair where you decide between life or death... Are you saying that we should have the government kill everybody that are a burden to the taxpayers? If not, then don't use that reasoning... What happens if in the nick of time, a private sponsor steps in and buys the convict one more year in prison? When he stops the payments, has he then 'murdered' the convict? What happens if the executioner is a maniac and enjoys his work? Should he be held responsible? How much money is your life worth? 20.000$ ? 50.000$ ?? Give me an exact figure, or stop thinking about lives in that way. How much is your mother/sister/girlfriend's life worth? 100.000$ ? If somone is sentenced to the deathpenalty, but it turns out he's rich, so he can pay his prisonfare himself, should he be allowed to live?

To all: Try to imagine that this discussion is not about the US but about pow's or prisoners in general. That way we can keep it clean. It's impossible to discuss general issues in here, either because somebody drags in the US, or because the americans take any comment as an attack on their own person. "No matter how horrible your crime, you always have human rights." (and I don't mean a cold Gatorade...) That's the contested notion. Agree/Disagree. Why/Why not? I Agree: Because "guilt" and the 'size' of your crime is more often than not a very subjective matter. As for Capital Punishment: If you decide to kill a criminal, then you commit the same act, that you want to punish him for: - deciding who get's to live and who get's to die. So by your own standards, you should be penalised in the same way...

But good work on the positive post b.t.w.

It's a <span style='color:green'><span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>+5 Enchanted Cucumber</span></span>, is that so hard to tell?

Uhm, brgnorway, I don't think that's quite what he meant, but I see why you react... 200.000 books? ...is nothing...

This one is still funnier though: Its superficial lower whole number is belongs to us!

God it's hard to ignore that last post from Tex[uSCM]... ...aaargh!...must resist.... I think I did it....now to sort this confusement out: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Thehamster @ Mar. 17 2002,23:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (nordin dk @ Mar. 17 2002,22:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What good does it do taking a life for another life it does not bring them a dead person back. Capital punishment is one of the few barbaric parts of society left in the 1st world in the countries where the majority people know no better and are socially backwards. <span id='postcolor'> I agree with you, but I guess you know... <span id='postcolor'> know what? <span id='postcolor'> That  I agree

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What good does it do taking a life for another life it does not bring them a dead person back. Capital punishment is one of the few barbaric parts of society left in the 1st world in the countries where the majority people know no better and are socially backwards. <span id='postcolor'> I agree with you, but I guess you know...

I agree with the damage corporation. The method of making the ball of the grain of easy step of 10 the English German English edition where is the best translation Babelfish ". " As for this it seems the way, it drew up that kind of legendary sentence: " We advance already, " it is not, " on side " it becomes smooth, if " in those there is no plate with respect to method the right, " it becomes, " owns that the grain of many plates! " It formed. I memorize the whole " of the Raven " at the place. (English-Japanese-English)

How many times have we discussed the same things now?