Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

mr. Duck

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    713

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by mr. Duck

  3. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If you dont like any of the editor descriptions then use the "Soldier" or DES Soldier" units. These were put in to give a mission maker complete flexibility in terms of names not containing the load out of the unit. Mission maker can also put any patch they want on the shoulder, including but not limited to the ones we provided with the pack.<span id='postcolor'>

    Me found glitch,I put a soldier team with a patch from the 82nd and a ranger assault team on the map. When I went to preview the rangers had a 82nd patch too. I tried the patch code on the rangers to give em the 75th again with no luck. This doesn't happen when you have two different squad's of soldiers though.

  4. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Feb. 18 2003,00:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (mr. Duck @ Feb. 18 2003,00:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Erm... Can anyone help me out here by answering the following question (sorry, stupid question again)?

    Wich rifle does the 10th Mount., 82nd Airb. and 101st AA currently use?

    I think it's the M4 for all three but I'm not sure.<span id='postcolor'>

    They do all use the M4A1<span id='postcolor'>

    *bows down for eviscerator*

    Thank you, thank you kindly  biggrin.gif

  6. Posted

    There is a "basic" soldier in BAS rangers/delta's addon. It's basicly a ranger with no arm patch. BAS even provided the arm patches (from the 82thAirb, 101thAA, 10thMt), you could even make you're own arm patches and put them in the BAS_weap.pbo, To get the patches is just a matter of reading the two readme's. Although they still have a M4 sopmod, you could always edit their init so that you would eventually have Autoriflemen and stuff.  smile.gif

    edit:

    There's a pic of it somewhere in the delta/rangers thread

  11. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Bernadotte @ Feb. 15 2003,23:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Harnu @ Feb. 15 2003,23:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Iraq is only bombed when planes patrolling the southern no-fly zone are threatend.<span id='postcolor'>

    Are you saying that it's ok to bomb a country if they try to defend their airspace?<span id='postcolor'>

    This is ok in the no fly zone, right:

    Shooting down Iraqi fighter's and bomber's in the no fly zone.

    Bombing Iraqi AA when they are a threat to coalition fighters.

    This is not ok:

    Civilian casaulties.

    Everything above but outside the no fly zone.

    Yes the latter one happens and I blame that on the pilot's or some kind of mailfunction.

    So basicly, yes it is ok to bomb at certain target's (Air defenses) as long as it happens in the no fly zone.

    edit:

    And as long as the no fly zone is legal

  13. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So? I would still take an F-16. <span id='postcolor'>

    Yes, good (me too), now let's cease this "which plane got the biggest dick" stuff yes? Before it turns out into a flame war and trigger happy mod comes in to lock it.

    Back to topic:

    Naah that ain't so bad, I don't see any big differences

    confused.gif

  14. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">.....The only problem left is how to remove Saddam...... <span id='postcolor'>

    I'd say look for a man who is willing to die for his country. Someone who knows that the mission he's about to do will cause his death and yet he accepts it. Just one assasin could do it, right? Somebody from the CIA perhaps? Who's crazy enough to snipe saddam? Or did they already tried this?

    edit:

    Oh wait, remove him, not neutralise him, yes I see... Hmmm...

  15. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RaptorAce @ Feb. 15 2003,20:59)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">F-16s arent as good as the F-15... the records prove it...

    but lets keep this on topic now, this bird looks good... though the pilot looks kind of big in that cockpit<span id='postcolor'>

    Ya, you're right, let's stay on topic.

    Pilot's too big? I dunno, let's see...

    s37.jpg

  20. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RaptorAce @ Feb. 15 2003,18:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">even if it did have 1-4 combat losses, which i dont believe, the eagle is still the best... i mean its still got 100 kills to a (possibly) minimal loss record<span id='postcolor'>

    You sound like a F-15 pilot. Most pilot's claim that the fighter they fly IS the best. But looking at you're birth date, I think you're not. (neither am I)

    The record of 100 kills vs. possible one loss is because of the pilots that are in it.

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The US Air Force claims the F-15C is in several respects inferior to, or at best equal to, the MiG-29, Su-27, Su-35/37, Rafale, and EF-2000, which are variously superior in acceleration, maneuverability, engine thrust, rate of climb, avionics, firepower, radar signature, or range. Although the F-15C and Su-27P series are similar in many categories, the Su-27 can outperform the F-15C at both long and short ranges. In long-range encounters, with its superiorr radar the Su-27 can launch a missile before the F-15C does, so from a purely kinematic standpoint, the Russian fighters outperform the F-15C in the beyond-visual-range fight. <span id='postcolor'>http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-15.htm

    smile.gif

  21. Posted

    Since where talking about the F-15

    Check here:

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Their primary targets were SCUDs, command and control links, armor, airfields and road interdiction. While flying over 2,200 sorties, only two were lost in combat.<span id='postcolor'>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/whitepaper.html

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">20 At least one USAF F-15 Eagle fighter has been lost, with the pilot, reportedly an African-American major, alive and in custody as a POW. At least one German pilot (some sources say two men, implying perhaps a Luftwaffe crew from a Tornado) has been captured. There is also a report that at least one US female pilot has been killed<span id='postcolor'>http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/docs99/990506-11614.htm

    I'll get more soon when I find some more, don't have the time now.

  22. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shashman @ Feb. 15 2003,06:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">sad.gif Hmmm....I managed to download the weapons but I can't get the infantry....I use Flashget.When I click on link, Flashget starts downloading but finishes the download after 2kb... sad.gif<span id='postcolor'>

    Try downloading the infantry at this page, you need to be registred at fileplanet (or gamespy) for this.

  23. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (cam0flage @ Feb. 15 2003,13:50)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, no and no biggrin.gif Those are Space Marines, which are somewhat human sized. I think that Martin has been using an Epic (or Epic 40k) Space Marine Titan as his source of inspiration.

    Look, I used to be a GW nerd tounge.gif<span id='postcolor'>

    Dude, so did I tounge.gif

    Look at the model dude, it resemble's a space marine (don't think about the size).

    btw, you sure you still aren't one? biggrin.giftounge.gif

  25. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RaptorAce @ Feb. 14 2003,23:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Thats cuz the Strike Eagle is the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be.  I'd like to see any aircraft come close to its incredible record<span id='postcolor'>

    I'm sure there will be an aircraft wich will have such a record. The strike eagle is just as good as the pilot is. I mean;

    novice pilot+F-15 vs. veteran pilot+mig29 = - F15

    And remember, records are there to be broken.   wink.gif

    edit:

    didn't the F-16 had a better record?

×