funkee

just get FRAPS. and here are some screenies from a shooting range: accuracy 90% and fail... crap

buy game, zGuba ;)

no idea, maybe there is no more courses in AA3, but as I remember in AA2, to play some maps (f.e SF Sandstorm), you had to pass additional courses (in this case Special Forces training).

New patch and... new issues. :( The game now freezes while "LOADING TRAINING MISSION" or just after click "PLAY TRAINING" (Phase 1 - RED): link. Downloaded and patched via Steam (that AA3Deploy thing was a total failure). I could get it to work only once (training mission) and what can I say is the sounds, weapons and animations are amazing. :ok: Interesting. for me AA3 performance is excellent (got constant 60 fps with everything set to max). You probly confuzed America's Army with ArmA. And 1 more thing - these stories of the AA Development Studio Closed is a total bullshit. They just expanded their studio and moved it to the other place: source. Besides they still work (on a next fixes), so dont spam the forum with dubious bullshit crap like this. Make sure you've passed proper courses (some missions may need a Special Forces or Advanced Individual training). Also check your PunkBuster (pnkBstrA.exe and PnkBstrB.exe must be working and allowed for communication).

This guy is right. I hope A2 demo won't be as shity as A1 demo was. :icon_rolleyes:

nvm Depleted. so the job is already done, now I just wanna know if BI is interested to implement this in upcoming patches (I don't want it to be a mod but "vanilla" ArmA2).

fail while downloading via AA3Deploy. 66% done and no progress. :banghead:

of course it does (at least tryes to simulate CCIP)... ...but there is no F16 in BF2 :) oh really? if so, could you plz do it? I'll love you for this

:459: and how do you like it?

Closing.

And is it free to download? omg I can't wait btw: could you plz put some links?

true, but A10 and Su25 are not a jets and can carry unguided bombs as well . besides, an Airfield map is big enough to find (you can use zoom) and take out enemy tanks. i'd love to do this playing mp berzerk :icon_rolleyes:

seems cool but this is a TGT display on the aircraft MFD for laser guided bombs like GBU, but it doesn't match to unguided ones like Mk or FAB. this would be fun :D

exactly. if this is a truth I'm really disappointed. Hope somebody can implement it in the future. well, this is a greater news :) but still not exactly what i expected :(

is not exactly, but CCIP-like. would be quite enough for ArmAII.

check multiplayer gameplay of coz :D

but CCIP releasing is manual as well :) Is there an impact point on the HUD?

maybe, but smoothness and lack of mouse lag are not "artificial gimmicks". well, we'll see after 19th.

confirm. the sound of bullets flying near your head is amazing and may cause a heart atack. additionaly, your accuracy decreases, so you can't hit anything while under fire. this makes suppresing fire very useful, so the game is much more cooperative than arma.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUlEm6z_XiI&NR=1 I do love the graphics, weapon sounds and animations. Been playing America's Army for years, but now (v3.0) it looks like completely new game. May be a serious rival for ArmA2 with it's 2 major advantages over the BI product: is free and smooth (read it "playble"). Sry for my english. :D

I lol'd here too. :D maybe he was just dozy... ;) nevermind. well argh9R, I understand you fine. there is a huge mouse lag in ArmA1, that sometimes (especially with the AI presence) makes the game almost unplayble, even if you have 100+ fps. it makes movement and aiming very hard and nasty. I dont know this is poor AI algorithms or lack of internet optimisation, but definitely something is wrong with ArmA engine. I haven't played ArmA2 (not released yet in my country), but I really hope the problem was resolved. if not, there is only 1 way... OFP2DR :) (sorry Maruk, live is brutal ;))

lol... I suggest to try english as I do and wait for original game :)

your welcome :P

This is not true. There is a significant difference between 1, 2 and 4 cores. Look at this thread (http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?t=73663&highlight=multicore): As you can see, there is about 100% increase from 2 to 4 cores.

so nothing has changed at this point?