foxer

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Mar. 27 2003,15:39)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ Mar. 27 2003,16:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Come on <!--emo& I mean really come ON Do you think you can really believe what people say in iraq.They will say anything to make us look bad.<span id='postcolor'> I really don't think it's that important, either way. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I'm not saying it didn't happen.But i rather wait to see what the US military says.<span id='postcolor'> They already responded. See my link above.<span id='postcolor'> i think i'll wait to see what they say in a month or 2.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 27 2003,15:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ Mar. 27 2003,15:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I can understand them blocking out Al-Jazeera though.I mean they show the faces of the dead and POW's before the family even knows.That's really crappy on their part.<span id='postcolor'> You don't have to watch it, nobody forces you. When CNN is showing pictures of dead or surrendering Iraqis, are you sure that they have notified their families?<span id='postcolor'> I know foxnews covers the enemy faces.I don't know about cnn. Sure no one has to watch anything,but if you hear marines have got killed and you have family over there that's in the marines,Do you think their not going try make sure ?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 27 2003,15:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">9--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Mar. 27 2003,159)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Could an Iraqi missile have hit the market yesterday?<span id='postcolor'> Eye witnesses said that two Tomahawk cruise missiles hit the market. Â </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Maj.-Gen. Stanley McChrystal said the U.S. had not targeted the Al-Shaab district in northern Baghdad, but admitted it was possible missiles had gone astray, causing the worst single incident of civilian casualties in a week of war.<span id='postcolor'> src<span id='postcolor'> Eye witnesses said that two Tomahawk cruise missiles hit the market. Come on I mean really come ON Do you think you can really believe what people say in iraq.They will say anything to make us look bad.I'm not saying it didn't happen.But i rather wait to see what the US military says.

I can understand them blocking out Al-Jazeera though.I mean they show the faces of the dead and POW's before the family even knows.That's really crappy on their part.

I don't really care if people protest or not.But if you block the damn road you should be sent to jail.You don't see people supporting the war blocking the roads. I think it's kinda funny though when the cops beat the shit outta the protestors.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tovarish @ Mar. 26 2003,23:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ Mar. 26 2003,23:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FallenPaladin @ Mar. 26 2003,23:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That`s sick! Training apes for detonating landmines is like training 4-year old children to do the same. <span id='postcolor'> How you feel about the US using  train dolphins to find sea mines ? I wonder how they train them.That would be cool to see on discovery channel or some other channel.<span id='postcolor'> There's quite a big difference between "find" and "detonate" don't you think? <span id='postcolor'> I was thinking from a Peta stand point.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FallenPaladin @ Mar. 26 2003,23:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That`s sick! Training apes for detonating landmines is like training 4-year old children to do the same. <span id='postcolor'> How you feel about the US using train dolphins to find sea mines ? I wonder how they train them.That would be cool to see on discovery channel or some other channel.

Do you guys think iraqis` executed america POWs ? Or do you guy think they was shot in the battle and well,the iraqi didn't give medical attention.I think they did the first one when they wouldn't say what they wanted on the video tape.Anyhow really doesn't matter how they died,because i don't think any of those POWs are coming home.Which is sad.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ Mar. 26 2003,22:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"I dont really like the UN myself though i think it works in some situations and has potential (like the EU)." Yeah, an organisation dedicated to helping starving children, distributing clothes and food and looking out for third world civilians. Its all bad <span id='postcolor'> Don't you think they kinda act late in war problems though ? The Us should never said anything about going to war with iraq.It should have been UN.They had to know something.Plus samething with north korea,the UN should step in and say your not talking to the US,your going talk to UN.The UN should show some balls too when they do.

This probably already been brought up.But whats your thought on about the 3,000 chemical suits they found in the hospital(iraqi soldiers were hiding in it) in iraq(forgot the cities name)? If they go in the desert with their tanks and all that is kinda stupid.I mean US,brits have more range on them,then they have on the us.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wires @ Mar. 26 2003,15:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Go the Danish Funny how a number of news site/channels ect have USA / Briton as the major players and list only Australia as having special forces in Iraq. We also have a number of ships and other forces such as navy clearance divers. There are also the Polish special forces in Iraq and I'm sure others we are not aware of  <span id='postcolor'> Seen it on the news yesterday.No one knew because the poland gov't didn't want the world to know.Until some pose for pictures with an america flag(with seals).

California is kinda like mexico.There's tons of mexicans living in and around south west america,nothing wrong with that.We don't call south florida, Â north cuba for no reason. --edit Don't forget about them canadains coming from the north.

To be fair i'll post this.But remember this was said on the 20th. U.S. and Kuwaiti sources initially reported all the missiles as Scuds, but the Pentagon later said it believes they were al Samouds or some other type of missile. http://www.cnn.com/2003....ex.html

Iraq also fired another Scud missile toward Kuwait on Friday, but Patriot missiles successfully intercepted the rocket over the desert. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,81791,00.html

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 22 2003,10:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ Mar. 22 2003,09:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I think it's been proven that iraq still had scuds,when they said they didn't.<span id='postcolor'> On the contrary. US and British military officials have said that they were not scuds. It was only some ignorant reporters and some excited Kuwaiti officials that have claimed that those were Scuds. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I think america,brits should keep the power in iraq,and not pass the stick to the UN.Why ? America would be alot more fair,then most countries in the UN.America gov't doesn't want to look like they went in there for the oil.So most likely they would bring in other countries companies into do the work,and some american companies.The french could bring in all their buddies companies,and home companies to fix iraq back up. If the french take over control of iraq.They could only send in russia,chinese ,and french companies.Those were the big players in vetoing the war.So mostly likely they wouldn't play fair for america,britian companies,or countries that supported the war.I'm thinking the french wants a piece of the pie.This is the only way they can get some.<span id='postcolor'> Lol. Are you kidding me? Since when does the French equal the UN. USA still has veto rights so blocking the things that you don't like is not an issue. The notion of USA and Britain who have against international law and against the wishes of the world engaged in a military agression would be more fair is laughable. The UN guarantees an internationally approved fair deal. Anyway, I think that unless Iraq is put under full UN control that USA should not get one penny from the UN for Iraq. It's your mess, you clean it up.<span id='postcolor'> On the contrary. US and British military officials have said that they were not scuds. It was only some ignorant reporters and some excited Kuwaiti officials that have claimed that those were Scuds. you sure ? They reported atleast 2 of the missiles were scuds. Anyway, I think that unless Iraq is put under full UN control that USA should not get one penny from the UN for Iraq. It's your mess, you clean it up. I agree.The pie(iraq) should be all the allies(which are about 30 countries,that help with intel, military ships,land) that help attack iraq. Lol. Are you kidding me? Since when does the French equal the UN. USA still has veto rights so blocking the things that you don't like is not an issue. The notion of USA and Britain who have against international law and against the wishes of the world engaged in a military agression would be more fair is laughable. The UN guarantees an internationally approved fair deal. Well,they would probably veto anything that doesn't help them.Which is wrong.Because they didn't want this to happen.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 22 2003,09:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ Mar. 22 2003,09:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The final suggestion that France gave was that (with the inspectors' approval) a 30 day ultimatum would be given to Iraq to fulfill all the requests that the inspectors had But that would be in the middle of apirl.Why didn't france do that back in january or february.Only because they offer that was because they/he knew war was close.He was just trying to stall,and just maybe the Us would not attack iraq this year.<span id='postcolor'> They suggested a 120 day period in January. But yes, it was about stalling so that the UN inspectors could get some work done. It was also a move to show that USA didn't give a damn about Iraq had WMDs or not.<span id='postcolor'> I think it's been proven that iraq still had scuds,when they said they didn't. Also about the rebuilding of iraq... I think america,brits should keep the power in iraq,and not pass the stick to the UN.Why ? America would be alot more fair,then most countries in the UN.America gov't doesn't want to look like they went in there for the oil.So most likely they would bring in other countries companies into do the work,and some american companies.The french could bring in all their buddies companies,and home companies to fix iraq back up. If the french take over control of iraq.They could only send in russia,chinese ,and french companies.Those were the big players in vetoing the war.So mostly likely they wouldn't play fair for america,britian companies,or countries that supported the war.I'm thinking the french wants a piece of the pie.This is the only way they can get some.

The final suggestion that France gave was that (with the inspectors' approval) a 30 day ultimatum would be given to Iraq to fulfill all the requests that the inspectors had But that would be in the middle of apirl.Why didn't france do that back in january or february.Only because they offer that was because they/he knew war was close.He was just trying to stall,and just maybe the Us would not attack iraq this year.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Mar. 22 2003,03:40)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Akira @ Mar. 22 2003,02:47)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Chirac The Ornery<span id='postcolor'> Wow. I cant believe i am going to say this: Chirac is right I dont think 'the coalition of the willing', Â after undertaking an illegal war, should be allowed to administer a post war Iraq. Â If the United States wants to show it is in the right in removing Saddam, then it needs to step back and allow the UN to administer humanitarian aid in the post war Iraq, and lay the ground work for an independent government of Iraq after the reconstruction begins. Anything else will be met by the world with cries of 'US imperialism' and none of you americans want that do you?<span id='postcolor'> But then there would only be french companies and russian ,chinese ,and some other companies getting the money to rebuild iraq.Is that fair for the US companies ?

Seems to me they know where everything is at.So makes you wonder if special forces didn't take out the illegal stuff before the attack.

They think one missile was a scud.They think the others were silkworm,chinese made.

I think the war is going be easy until they get to baghdad(other cities),tonight or tomorrow night.

I guess it's offcial,the marines cross the border.

bush is going speak at 2:45pm est (it's about 1:50 pm now).

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Red Oct @ Mar. 20 2003,19:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">has there been any casualties?<span id='postcolor'> you probably won't hear about any of them until tonight(america time of course).

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (KingBeast @ Mar. 20 2003,19:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Im simply amazed at how fast things are happening, I would have thought the Attacking forces would use their Air advantage to good effect before actually moving ground forces in, but nope, not even a day has passed and they seem to be moving in, at least to a degree. I wonder if it will turn out to be a good tactic or a terrible one. Its quite shocking to see how fast they are moving on this. Imagine how the Iraqis are feeling right now.<span id='postcolor'> i thought it was going happen the first night.When they said it's going be fast,i believe they wouldn't wait for planes to soften the targets up.Because that would be just like the old gulf war plans.