foxer

France. Sometime in the 90s the france people lost the gov't.We americans must strike the  french gov't ,and then give it back to the people.It should be alot easier then iraq,rumor has it their tons of white cloths in france right now. Someway the french gov't spread their agents to canada. We have to go to canada and kick the french  agents outta that country to liberate canadain people.Only let them teach english language in their schools,not french. Just kidding ,I hope you people would know that.

I fired guns at 6. Maybe little younger,also my dad got me a .22 rifle ,when i was like 8.However he never did let me touch it without him there.Also he always locked  up his guns. --edit Also ,i'm not from texas.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FSPilot @ April 17 2003,22:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Then call a spade a spade and recognize that Bush was just as much a draft-dodger; the only difference was he had a rich daddy who could get him into the National Guard.<span id='postcolor'> Ok ok, so Bush doesn't have a perfect ANG record. Â It's still better than skipping the country to protest. Â An old flight isntructor of mine was a SF in Cambodia. Â Spent his tour over there blowing up bridges, secretly of course.<span id='postcolor'> I think you have to face it, Bush jr ran off his last name. Only reason he's president now is because of his father.Only reason he got in a good college was because of his father.Only reason he didn't get in trouble is because of his father.Only because where he's now is because of his father.

Also to be in the green berets you have to speak another language.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 17 2003,14:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ April 17 2003,14:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Why haven't we tried to pay off castro to step down ? I mean something like a billion dollars or something.Wouldn't it be easier then playing a stupid little game.Heck why didn't we do it to saddam ?<span id='postcolor'> Heh. Yeah right. Do you think that Bush would given a couple billion dollars dismantle the US government and abolish the US constitution? Castro & Co are already wealthy beyond imagination they're not interested in money. You can't solve everything in the world with money.<span id='postcolor'> You're probably right.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just noticed I posted this in the wrong thread. Was supposed to be in the Iraqi one... "Are you talking about the rescue of the 7 POW's? Yeah heard the same thing from a live BBC report." Nah, I am talking about the female one. Jessica. Who also fought of the assault, got shot and stabbed but apparantly without sustaining any wounds from it "It's still a rescue, even when the Iraqi guards left, she couldn't of just got up and walked back to US troops, not with the injuries that she had." Well, I would agree except for two things... 1. An Iraqi medic tried to hand her over, peacefully, the day befpre but he was fired upon by American soldiers. 2. All communication on it made it out like it was a daring rescue against a fortified enemy headquarters, which was clearly false. The sad part is that this is just one of many lies in this war. Sadder still is that Americans seem to accept their government lying to them, and making hens out of feathers. If I was American I would want to know the truth, not the Hollywood version of it. <span id='postcolor'> From another thread Longinius started. I agree there is some lies about the jessica girl rescue,i don't know about the other one yet.But they said she fought for her death,Yeah right.She been stab and shot,and most people wouldn't have lived through that.But yet they still haven't said if she was stab ,shot.All they said is she has broken legs and a back.Which I don't understand how she got that ,unless you fell from a high attitude.Which likely she didn't.So she was getting torture.Do you really think they would just leave an american pow in a hospital without any iraqi watching her ? Plus they do say they found ammo,guns,other stuff in the hospital.So it could have been a stronghold.The way i heard the story is that an iraqi lawyer(his wife work in the hospital,thats how he seen her) seen her in the hospital and he walk 8 miles to the marines and told them.The marines sent him back and told him to get maps.

Why haven't we tried to pay off castro to step down ? I mean something like a billion dollars or something.Wouldn't it be easier then playing a stupid little game.Heck why didn't we do it to saddam ?

Does it really matter ? Atleast their back,alive,and didn't get torture(?).In which cases I wonder why iraqi's didn't do it.They knew they was a dying regime.Iraq leadership must have been running fast as hell and forgot about them.

In this war is when special forces really took off for the US,i think. What did your family member use to do in vietnam ? Seems like every american knows someone that use to fight in vietnam. My grandfather was in special forces(green berets).

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 16 2003,15:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Blaegis @ April 16 2003,12:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Logical it may be, but it's not going to happen. Well, there's the EU summit and UN SC meeting taking place today, so perhaps we'll see which way things are going.<span id='postcolor'> In theory Russia and/or France could seriously fuck over the US by refusing to lift the sanctions. That would block the usage of the Iraqi oil for everybody (except the civilians through the oil-for-food program). It would however be a significant escalation of the current Euro-American conflict. Nobody wants to see this because Europe is America's biggest trading partner and vice-versa. Also the Iraqi population would draw the short straw. I think however the Bush administration is also painfully aware of the fact that if the sanctions arn't lifted then this whole war would have been in vain for their part. Iraq would reamin as paralyzed as it was before the war. So I think that Bush will be looking for a compromise. On the other hand, one never knows. It's not like he has been listening to others so far. Â Too bad that the Iraqis will be in the squeeze, otherwise it would have been a good idea to teach the Bush administration the consequences of ignoring the international community. It does not have to be for long, just a year until he loses the elections. The US economy has gone down the drain so his career depends very much on the outcome in Iraq. Make it a shitty one and you'll have somebody more reasonable in charge next term..<span id='postcolor'> You know if america did that,there would be an protest,burning american flags.People saying this is why they hate usa gov't.So blah.Once again,if USA is not doing it ,it's ok.However if they do,their screwed,stupid,don't know what their doing.Blah Damn if you do,damn if you don't.

I disagree.Every country in the SC isn't perfect.So they would all be kick out.What the heck is this illegal war crap ? Do you bitch about russia wars? How bout china and Tibet,I mean ,FREE TIBET DAMN YOU COMMIES,can't a monk live in peace. .Should they be in in the SC? Maybe the french hasn't done yet,but then agian maybe they have,i just don't give ratass to look it up.However it's just amount of time before they do.

Well,you are european.Everytime i go to orlando water park,there's is tons of europeans with speedos on.

You telling me ,you never want to shoot a gold gun ?

Kicking the french out of the SC(Security Council ) bad ? You people are saying that is wrong.Because they agree with your opinion you want them in the SC ? Wasn't when the war started that some of you said the US should be kick outta the SC ? So aslong as they agree with your opinion,they should stay,However if they don't they should be gone or nuked(i know your only kidding ). Hypocrisies,However the door does swing both ways.

I heard the Tippman is one of the best paintballs guns for the price.But i don't know.

5% is high for all the drugs we have now in days.But Then again,think about china Billion people,everyone living soo close.Compact cities will have most of the problems,Atleast that's what i think.I doubt it would be a problem for cities that is spread out.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ April 15 2003,05:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Again, just like with the reporters, this was pointed out explicitly to the American leadership, but they chose to ignore what's good for them: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> Antiquities experts, dismayed that U.S. officials failed to heed their warnings to protect Baghdad's historic artifacts during the war, said on Monday they were concerned the priceless treasures looted from Iraq's main museum may never be recovered. U.S. archeological organizations and the U.N.'s cultural agency UNESCO said they had provided U.S. officials with information about Iraq's cultural heritage and archeological sites months before the war began. University of Chicago professor McGuire Gibson was among a group that met Pentagon officials several times and presented them with a list of archeological and other sites that should be protected, particularly the Iraqi National Museum in Baghdad. "We warned them about looting at the very beginning," said the archeologist who has worked extensively in the region. "I was assured it would be secured." Now, he said, the loss was immeasurable. "The Baghdad museum is the equivalent of the Cairo Museum. It would be like having American soldiers 200 feet outside the Cairo museum watching people carry away treasures from King Tut's tomb or carting away mummies," said Gibson. <span id='postcolor'> iraqwar.ru<span id='postcolor'> When the war is over.The iraqis' will sell it.Mostly likely americans,europeans,middle-eastern people will buy it all up.Unless you think their going destroy it ? That gun looks sweet. Also,maybe they didn't have enough soldiers at that time to cover it.Unless again your thinking that the iraqi soldiers didn't fight in the cities.

damn right.Anyways,About the french.They didn't have to threaten to veto it.They could have stay a neutral country.For being an allies for an long time,that's not alot to ask for. But anyways,check this out.......... http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/12/sprj.irq.war.main/index.html Now that missile/artillery shell is weird whatever it is.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ April 12 2003,15:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> He said the Republican Guards did not want to engage in street fighting in Baghdad, despite allied forces being convinced they would make a last stand there, since the Iraqi soldiers' families were there and then "everything (can be) broken that's yours, so if I fight in my city, every building is mine ... those are our families, our babies." "If you want to fight, you should fight out of (away from) your home," he said. The main problem, he said, was that the troops saw "no one who command us to do this or not this or who tell us what the planning is, so for what I fight. Stay at home is better." <span id='postcolor'> Â And this shows you that Iraqi army did pay attention to civilian losses. Â Too bad they were hte only ones.<span id='postcolor'> Umm,Come again ? Are you saying the US wasn't trying to avoid civilian losses ? Do you say this out of ignorance or just pure stupidity? Its an honest question and not an insult.

Some of you guys seem bitter that the US/UK took out saddam.Maybe you wishing for more US deaths,or an iraq win ? I mean,I didn't agree with this war.But i'm happy the right side won(well about to win).But it's just a proven fact,no matter what the USA does there will always people against them.Like the sanctions,and how many civilians it's killed.Now their talking about how many civilians are killed doing the bombings.I think big question here is,Why are you against any action america takes.Sanctions,you blame and whine about america killing civilians.Now the war to take care of saddam/sanctions/WMD(?).Can you people ever agree with america,or will always be against their actions they take.To me it's like you guys always against america actions. So damn if you ,damn if you don't.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (sn1per @ April 11 2003,09:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 11 2003,10:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ April 11 2003,08:43)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">We don't know that.Unless you can tell the future. He could have done anything he wanted ,with chemical weapons.If he has chemical weapons,he could have attack any allies/oil in the middle-east.<span id='postcolor'> Aha, so that's the logic. USA has nukes and chemical weapons. Since I don't know the future, you could be very well planning to attack Sweden. That gives me the right to attack USA in a pre-emptive strike, to disarm you. Hell, I'm sure that's what Osama did. Â <span id='postcolor'> Maybe they'll attack Finland first. After all, we do have gas masks in our combat gear. The world has a lot of dictatators much like saddam, only difference being that they do not have oil. (iraq oil is now being directed to israel, what a way to help iraq people) And how was saddam a serious threat to U.S.? By having suspected WMD? and how would he have deployed the WMDs? with al-samoud missiles (that have a range of 300km or so?) Only good thing about this war is that Bush is wasting american tax-payer's money, instead of using it to help his own people in the U.S.<span id='postcolor'> I never said their a threat to USA homeland.I said their a threat to the oil,american allies.Were not the french,we don't forget about allies.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 11 2003,08:40)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ April 11 2003,08:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Sure, some will say he wouldn't attack anyone,but we don't know that.<span id='postcolor'> We've got some very solid proof now that he wouldn't. He didn't use them against you now, did he? Even though you removed him from power, he did not use them (if he now had them). That's all the evidence you need that he was no threat in the first place.<span id='postcolor'> We don't know that.Unless you can tell the future. He could have done anything he wanted ,with chemical weapons.If he has chemical weapons,he could have attack any allies/oil in the middle-east.

I disagree.If they find chemical weapons in iraq ,then iraq is an threat to America and Allies. If iraq(saddam) had chemicals weapons,nuclear weapons he could hold the middle east hostage.Sure, some will say he wouldn't attack anyone,but we don't know that.If he has chemical weapons,nuclear.He could do anything he wanted to do.That's when iraq(saddam) becomes a threat to the US,and US allies.I doubt the US would leave it's allies on a battle field with no american support.Plus we(america) would fight for the oil ,if not for the middle east allies. So ,yes,Iraq(saddam) was a threat to the america.

America health care system isn't the best in the world.But close to it.But i heard how bad canada health care is,Which is free,they just tax the hell outta you.I heard in canada you have to wait a month or two to see a docter.Unless it's an emergency.Also you have to wait an month/two for surgery.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Hit_Sqd_Maximus @ April 11 2003,04:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Marines find nukes? <span id='postcolor'> Doesn't matter what kind of weapons that they find in iraq.If the iraqi's didn't use them on US/UK soldiers they didn't have any.Even if they find a huge cache of it.No one will believe it.Why ? Because they still are against this war.