deadmoroz

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Soul_Assassin @ Jan. 12 2003,22:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Moget vsem Ruskim ModMakeram zdes' sobratsa dlya sotrudnechestva?<span id='postcolor'> maybe, maybe...

I guess it is Kool to sit somewhere in usa or in europe and discuss things that you never know well. First of all I have to say: they arent "rebels" or "separatists" or "fighters for independence", they are the TERRORISTS. There is a lot of records with destroying trucks/aps with people, shooting down helicopters. I saw how they cut off human head with an axe, how they cut off fingers. One man was killed just because he was russian. Russia fights with terrorists as usa does it. Question about money. It is not a secret: money comes from arabic countries. Also it comes from usa, europe(england, eermany, france etc.) there are a lot of mercenaries in chechnia. In 2001 there was killed former scool teacher from usa. He came to chechnia "to fight against Russia" as he said before he died. Also there are a lot of afgan terrorists

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Scorpio @ Aug. 23 2002,17:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">deadmoroz, if you would like this model to be imported and textured, then contact my by PM.<span id='postcolor'> heh, it will be released by Kavkaz Crisis mod My Webpage

check this out

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ Aug. 09 2002,20:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (deadmoroz @ Aug. 07 2002,190)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Why does RPG-7 so weak? In reallife It is very powerful antitank weapon(but not only, because it also has deadly fragmentation anâ thermabolic warheads) I need 6 or 7 rockets to destroy abrams. it is not good <span id='postcolor'> In real life the RPG-7 will barely scratch the paint of a M1 Abrams tank.  It will not even penetrate the top armor according to some M1 tankers I've talked to. The rear armor I don't know about, but I suspect that the rear is likewise fairly heavily armored.  The Iraqi's for example tried all kinds of strategies to try and destroy the M1s including using Reverse slope tactics to hit the rear of the tanks but none were destroyed.  Only a few were disabled.  With an RPG the best you could hope for is to damage optics or blow off the treads or one of the wheels. You *might* be able to destroy one with a top attack from a building for example if you were able to hit one of the hatches on the top where the armor is thinner.  But the RPG is not known for pinpoint accuracy and firing any rocket from a building is risky if you don't have proper ventilation so it would require a bit of luck to destroy an M1 in that manner. So if the the RPG-7 was realistic in OFP, you would not be able to destroy an M1 tank at all with it unless you got a lucky hit like on the turret ring. However against tanks that don't use advanced composite armor the latest generation of RPG-7 rockets are deadly as they have tandem warheads designed to defeat reactive armor.  So they'll destroy T-72 and T-80 tanks.  Chris G. aka-Miles Teg<GD><span id='postcolor'> cool We have here some serious specialists in using RPG-7 against Abrams. Did you shoot RPG-7 in real life? Did you try to destroy Abrams? I guess, NO. But you(not only you, also a lot of others) say that "In real life the RPG-7 will barely scratch the paint of a M1 Abrams tank. It will not even penetrate the top armor according to some M1 tankers I've talked to." Maybe because RPG-7 is russian weapon and because you think that all russian weapons are shit you said RPG-7 is nothing against abrams. You just dont have a proof. Without a proof I could say everything. Also you have said about some *your* methods about how to destroy M1 with RPG. One question: have you tested that methods by yourself?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (cheeky monkey @ Aug. 09 2002,18:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (deadmoroz @ Aug. 09 2002,16:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">De lisle has only 50 meters<span id='postcolor'> Ive read 300-400m from a number of sources, not 50m. And the VSS is a 9mm, the De Lisle is a .45 ACP Read this about silenced rifles and subsonic ammunition<span id='postcolor'> You could shoot the man on 400(MAYBE) but would the bullet kill the enemy??? I guess you think that VSS uses 9x19 mm rounds It uses very powerful 9x39 round with bullet of weight about 16 gramms. Parabellum sucks

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (cheeky monkey @ Aug. 08 2002,16:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FLYBOY4258 @ Aug. 08 2002,02:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">the reason you cant suppress the dragunov is because it's bullet apeed is fast then sound. the PSG-1 has a bullet that travels slower then sound thus being suppessed by what they call a multi-chamber suppress. basicly it keeps all the gases in the barrel so it cant spin and make noise<span id='postcolor'> The standard 7.62mm X51 what the PSG-1 fires travels at over twice the speed of sound so it definately is not subsonic. There is 7.62mm X51 subsonic ammo for use with silenced rifles but it has a maximum effective range of about 200m and has a trajectory like rainbow . A 0.45 ACP from a De Lisle is a better option still only an effective range of 400m but it beats a 7.62 subsonic. And the De Lisle is one of the quietest silenced weapons, if not the quietest.<span id='postcolor'> Well, the VSS Vintorez is THE BEST silenced sniper rifle all over the world. De lisle has only 50 meters effective range when vintorez can kill the enemy on 400 meters. Also De lisle is bolt-action, so you heve to reload it after every shot. VSS was developed in 1987, and still noone has weapon of such power.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Major Fubar @ Aug. 09 2002,10:40)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Abrams @ Aug. 07 2002,19:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (deadmoroz @ Aug. 07 2002,21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Why does RPG-7 so weak? In reallife It is very powerful antitank weapon(but not only, because it also has deadly fragmentation anâ thermabolic warheads) I need 6 or 7 rockets to destroy abrams. it is not good <!--emo&<span id='postcolor'> then you din`t know how to fire I need 2 rockets to disale Abrams <span id='postcolor'> Also depends on difficulty setting... Cadet = more easily destroyed vehicles.<span id='postcolor'> i always play Veteran

Why does RPG-7 so weak? In reallife It is very powerful antitank weapon(but not only, because it also has deadly fragmentation anâ thermabolic warheads) I need 6 or 7 rockets to destroy abrams. it is not good

da, Stalin was the great leader. Soviet people won WW2 with his help. Without Stalin it was impossible.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Most of the fortifications were made by chinese prisoners brought in by russians during 19th century. They digged trenches and built fortifications. Of course, the death rate was unbelievably high. Every time a chinese worker fell he would be buried at the spot; you can easily find human bones next to the trenches with only a little digging. When the fortifications were complete, the remaining chinese were taken with ferries to the middle of Finnish Gulf. Russian soldiers broke the bottom of the ferries and all the chinese prisoners drowned. What a nice pay for a work well done. <span id='postcolor'> Russians have NEVER fight against China! You are wrong. Study World history more

I live in Russia, I am Russian, I say that our tanks, helicopters, planes, weapons etc are the best. You live in NATO, you say the same. Who is right?? But AK-47 is being used in about 80 countries(M-16 only in 15), 5 countries have Goverment Flag with AK on it. Sorry for maybe wrong Eng.

Has onyone hear about antiterroristic operation in Chechnia?