Jump to content

HaseDesTodes

Member
  • Content Count

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Everything posted by HaseDesTodes

  1. HaseDesTodes

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    Has anyone noticed that the version says 1.71.141530? Shouldn't it be version 1.70?
  2. HaseDesTodes

    Jets DLC Official Feedback

    the vapor cone has not much to do with super sonic flight. it is just an effect that occurs, when the pressure of the air drops so much that the air humidity starts condesing, because the dew point drops below the current air temperature. this is more likely to happen whith a very high humidity (eg. above water surfaces or around clouds) but it can also happen at very high speeds (supersonic) with high humidity but going supersonic is no necessity for this to happen. so to have this effect coverd in a realistc way (or else other people will complain) you would need to have so many parameters coverd (air pressure, air humidity, speed, geomety of the aircraft, angle of attack, etc.) that it's propably better that it's not in the game. https://feedback.bistudio.com/T124498
  3. that can all be true (and i think it is) but still completly miss the point. the point is: should the missile lockon range be influenced/limited by the view distance (object drawing distance) in the player settings? even if my PC was so slow, that i couldn't run view distances >1000m (so i have object drawing distance set to 1000m) and i can't see the aircraft i am trying to lock on to (because my PC isn't drawing it), the target is still there and my missiles should be able to see it.
  4. yes and no. having him on the radar doesn't necessarily mean that it would be possible to see him on visual and ir spectrums. because it could be a cold dark target at night. or because IR and visual frequencys are blocked by weather conditions (eg. fog). since radar works on a differnt frequency it should be possible that the radar radiaton doesn't get absorbed or dispersed by the fog, so that you can still get clear signals. BUT: as long as the only difference is the view distance set by the client/server, that should not affect the vehicle and weapon sensors, because what you said. graphic settings is about looks (and performance), it shouldn't influence the gameplay if possible.
  5. i would understand this if the view was limited by weather, but in my case it is limited by player (server) settings. so if a jet pilot has 1km more view distance than me, he could approach, lock and destroy me without any chance i could fire back, even if my missiles would be able to lock him if only i had the same view distance set. doesn't sound like it should be this way to me.
  6. i think this is not realy reladed to the sensors itself, but i have been told today and confirmed it myself, that you can lock on slingloaded ground vehicles with Titan AT, Scalpel etc. but not on the helicopter itself. so i was wondering if this is intention or just an oversight. i also have noticed, that Titan AT can't lock on ground vehicles that are up in the air without beeing slingloaded (setpos), but scalpel missiles can. next thing i found was, that with a chetah AA i was able lock air vehicles with my radar as soon as they got into range, but the weapon lockon was still dependend on the (object) view distance. (view distance 12km-> Orca lockon at 4km range; viewdistance 2.5km-> orca lockon 2.5km) and i thought, that AA tanks should get some UI additions like aircraft have with their hud, so that you can see radar targets in the hud and what target you are locking on to. if any of the described behaviour is unintended, i'll gladly file a (or more) ticket on the feedback tracker.
  7. HaseDesTodes

    Tanks DLC Feedback

    I didn't have the endurance to read through more than the first page, so i'll just share what i thought of that could fit in: 1: better vison for drivers. doesn't have to be modeled interieur, having some kind of free look for the camera or difernt camers to swich to (using numpad freelook) 2. better damage models as frequently requested 3. improving tanks is good, but how about some AT improvements? so if we got beter damage models, why don't we get top down, attacks for missiles like Titan AT, or that NLAW firemode where the missiles flys over the top of a tank and explodes there for the pcml maybe we could also get options to stick explosives to a tank hull without scripting 4. fire from vehicle positions for tanks/apcs where the infantry just mounts on top of the vehicle, just like it's already in RHS 5. improved countermeasures against missiles
×