Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

TheMasterofBlubb

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    59

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Everything posted by TheMasterofBlubb

  1. TheMasterofBlubb
    Can you tell us the new values? Source: dedmen on discord
  2. TheMasterofBlubb
    Hit me up in PM and we can discuss further, this specific thread is meant for stuff related to the special builds. I can help you figuring out what you guys need.
  3. TheMasterofBlubb
    @VulturARG from what i experienced something like a i7 6700/k or R5 2400 could do the job pretty well, mostly it depends on what your mission is doing in the background (scripts mods etc). BUT and here comes the biggest problem you guys might encounter, virtual cores are not the same as physical cores in terms of RAW performance, somtimes it can get worse if some other user on the same physical computer does some heavy stuff (it depends on how the sheduler of the VM-Host is working). In general i figured out its in the long term easier AND cheaper to get some good dedicated server and set it up on your own (yes i know that takes some time, but its really worth as its not at all comparable to what you can get from some gamehosters, like nitrado, for the same price, regardless of the actual game running) To reference the current server i manage, is a 60Player PVP one, its a intel i7 4790k (4GHz) with 30GB of RAM in a VM (but the only VM on that PC, mostly for some extra features) we run 2 servers with each getting 2 physical and 2 logical cores and additionally some (like 5 or 6) tools around that for management and logging. The mission and configs are pretty optimized and almost no AI. We get (thx to some really nice tutorials and documentations from dedmen) about 80-100FPS with one server full. If you plan on having a lot of AI, definetly use Headless Clients, my last test on that is 2or 3 years ago, Liberation with 1 Server and 3 HC on a i7 6700k with 64GB RAM, was at around 1500 AI (most in groups) at stable 50fps
  4. TheMasterofBlubb

    ASM.exe

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to 3LGStevo's topic in ARMA 3 - SERVERS & ADMINISTRATION

    Just a small thing to note, as i had not changed the Monitor Application it self the RAm usage is still 32bit so it can show something like 180MB usage thats due to the fact that it goes to 0 after 4096MB. If there is someone that can recreate the Graphs to look like freds, i happily would help to get the values needed.
  5. TheMasterofBlubb

    ASM.exe

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to 3LGStevo's topic in ARMA 3 - SERVERS & ADMINISTRATION

    @Tankbuster there i think is some newer Monitor app, at least thats what i think when looking at some of the vast differences between the features of my Monitor app and the features of the linux port. But i included the App from somewhere earlier in this thread. It definetly works with that (just not the Net and Disk IO, if someone can help me there that would be a charm)
  6. TheMasterofBlubb

    ASM.exe

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to 3LGStevo's topic in ARMA 3 - SERVERS & ADMINISTRATION

    im just passing by..... https://github.com/TheMasterofBlubb/ASM-Redux
  7. TheMasterofBlubb
    @Diveyez The perf build is without the profiling stuff, eventhough if i remember its just local logging possibilities(you know GDPR and Stuff)
  8. TheMasterofBlubb
    Interesting how come i had a MP server running modded liberation with ~700 active AI and 15 players. All running at 55 server fps and client side depending on the PC from 40 to 120fps?
  9. TheMasterofBlubb
    The problems in comlicated Engines always exist, just by beeing complicated. RV suffers from that Enfusion will too and other bigger complicated Engines will too. Its just a matter of time till they pop up.
  10. TheMasterofBlubb
    Thats cool that you fix the mods you use but what about the other 99.9% in use right now?
  11. TheMasterofBlubb
    @Diveyez no bias towards BI or anything else. Im not sure if you know what Arma runs on.. its a i think 14 years old engine (RV) that isnt even technically able to run Arma 3 and somehow it runs (not even bad if knowing the quirksin scripting and server administration). So the solution would be a new engine. There already is one in development, its called Enfusion (new in-house Engine). Pros: -Better Performance -Future Proof -New technologies like DX12 / Vulkan Cons: -mod compatibility??? (thats what Arma lives from) -new bugs and quirks ( this is present on any more compicated engine and Arma is heck of a lot more complicated than BF or CoD) -new scripting language , so probably Missions will not be compatible... So we have 2 options A) take what we have . And we got way better performance wise since the Alpha. I personally get stable FPS from 40 to 80FPS depending on the server and mods. I run a Ryzen R7 2700X (all core 4.1GHz) B) lose probably all our mods (many developers moved along, because they finished they work) and there is no one to update them (look what happened with APEX and the Map lighting). there is even 1 option i like the most: Make Arma 4 with the new Engine and make it backwards compatible like Arma 3 to Arma 2, even with performance cost. Thats a tough choice if you ask me, but as of what i play im ok with 40 to 80 fps (Arma is not that fast paced that you would need 200fps like in doom). PS: regarding someone will do it better and faster... someone would need the knowhow that BIS has and i mean not BI but BIS, because BI could ask BIS for help in many situations. Additionaly if there would be someone we would already have a Arma 2 competitor, the only thing we have is Squad, having no mod support and no scripting language at all. So if there is someone out there we like to see what they offer.
  12. TheMasterofBlubb
    @laxemann and @jokoho482 is there any way to get Dynasound and ES to work without CBA? I have problems with a change of direction CBA is going due to actual gameplay changes forced upon players. As an example: I want to host a server that allows your wonderfull mod as an optional one. What now happens is that people using this mod have a advantage over people not doing so.(for example they can load 100rnd Mags in to the MX rifles) So now we are in a position where we have to decide wether we force CBA on everyone regardless of need or remove your all optional CBA mods..
  13. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @mankyle my only number 1 for Arma 4 is NO PHYSX (by Nvidia)
  14. TheMasterofBlubb

    CBA - Community Base Addons - ARMA 3

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to vipermaul's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE

    Ahhhh the Forum is trolling me. i could get out of the nametag sry for the Spam. What i wanted to write is that if CBA is enabled you can load a 100rnd mag in to a MX/M/C what shouldnt be possible and is not when using plain vanilla Arma
  15. TheMasterofBlubb
    @Malcain im not sure that this "ad"is by CBA if i play on my favorite server i get a different mod+version every time i press ESC
  16. TheMasterofBlubb

    Release Candidate Branch Discussion

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL

    As i can not get the cursor out of the Nametag: The Wipeout is the most armored plane in Arma 3 and is a designated Anti Tank plane, it has a huge 30mm APHE Cannon and can withstand 2 to 3 AA missiles at times where all other jets are down after 1. The other planes expect the Neophron (almost same ammo as Wipeout) have only HE rounds that can do good damage on planes and helis. So you probably when hitting the Wipepout or Neo with the 20mm HE do modular damage on engine or fuel tanks. Try to see where you do damage when you hit those planes, as sometimes the plane wont land anymore, what is technically destroying it( as after Jets DLC you dont need to blow a jet up to kill it, i have seen this multiple times in PvP where 1 AA manpad can do a luckyshot and the engines are down).
  17. TheMasterofBlubb

    Release Candidate Branch Discussion

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL

    @TheRealGrossaaa
  18. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @SuicideKing its not a lock you just need radar to be active. Im not even sure if AI deactivates radar at all.
  19. TheMasterofBlubb

    88th Clan

    TheMasterofBlubb posted a topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL

    http://88th.es/ This is a Clan i recently discovered through a report in my main Gaming community. Their Logos are somewhat reassambling the nazi symbols. They are saying they are an ESports team in Arma 3, with official sponsors. Their logo is literaly used by Nazis. I would like the BI Community guys to talk to them since its not cool to be associated with these kind of people playing this game.
  20. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @SuicideKing when radar is activate1d you get a lead marker for the cannon. So kinda a dynamic target indicator
  21. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    I think a good start would be the SPAA, they need some love since the jets DLC.
  22. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @SuicideKing Addition when changing the lock-on range to 6km a change on the AA Tanks would be good. They have 6KM lockon range but the Missiles are IR, as my knowledge, from PVP its very hard to lock on a BlackWasp or Shikra with Manpad AA even when good vision compared to a Gryphon/A-164/a-143, where you cal lock on technically at viewdistance. So maybe change the AA tank on having 1 IR and 1 Radar type missile or a Combo missile, to actively be able to fight jets. Leave the radar on the range it has now but the missiles on maybe 8KM max lockon range. We have HARMs now we have RWR. A plane knows when its getting locked vanilla shoud now make use of that. Since all those changes i mentioned are actually only config changes it should not even be as much work. That would make Planes more viable, but not break the current mechanics to hard. And make AAs more viable since they are now a real threat to a jet, leading to more teambased gameplay. As for info: Im playing mostly EUTW. The Cheetah and Tigris are used almost for Infatry-mawing. Using radar only gives out your position, but doesnt give you any real advantage vs planes, only a bit against helis. The missiles have problems locking on the jets, especially the DLC jets. So at all a AA will leave the radar off and kill some Small helis that are unaware and just kill infantry. As addition the AA has the infantry and other tanks as enemies, but can not hunt down its prey due to simple limitations of weaponary
  23. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @D_Donskoy The Problem with the artillery module is only present on the VLS because it has terrain following possibilities
  24. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @nodunit about the S400 similarity: it could be solved by the flight mechanic of the titan top attack. Fly straight for say 50m and then start homing.
  25. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    TheMasterofBlubb replied to DnA's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    @Beagle i mean to fight the same target. IR is just more reliable. as it aproaches the Radartarget is checks if it can switch to IR so even if the radar is switched of in the last sec it doesnot save you. I can imagine that such systems exist
×