-
Content Count
443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Posts posted by Aniallator
-
-
Just to clarify:
The only thread for content requests in these forums is: Arma 3 Addon request.
RHS related bugs, issues, and feature requests for our assets goes to: our official feedback tracker (it's imperative to set them in the correct category and fill all the form fields).
I hope it helps :)
Not sure if the USAF Pilot and Jet Pilot with M1911A1 was a bug or not, so I just put it here.
-
I am working on 2 campaigns right now friend, 1 is involving deltahawk's units and it is set in 1993 in Somalia if you can guess what even it is ;) and also with RHS escalation in a invasion of Chernarus campaign but trust me it wouldn't be like the Arma 2 campaign. I just hope RHS had some LAVs for the marines but this isn't the place to talk about it :P
There will be a handful of Operation Gothic Serpent missions coming out, it'll be fun to play them all and compare :) Just out of curiosity, what map are you using for yours? If it's not confidential?
-
He called you out correctly! I've seen at least 10 other threads that you do this and then you continue to ask for more and more. How about STOP like you've been asked to by numerous developers (respectfully, yet you continue to disregard these people's wishes) and learn how to do something on your own if you want all these assets in the game.
OR pay them a wage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know where you're getting all this crap, but to clarify, I've never been called out by a developer for a suggestion I submitted, and I've only ever made suggestions in about five threads... two maybe three of those times I've been called out by people such as yourself because you thought my suggestion redundant or unnecessary or didn't like it for whatever reason. If my suggestion is any of those things to you... maybe just ignore it?! Suggestions don't go anywhere if no one replies. Is there some kind of taboo on suggestions in the A3 forum that I'm not aware of? This argument is ridiculous and petty.
Now, FYI to devs, the M9 Beretta doesn't appear as an item in the editor, and the M18 green smoke is now "RGO Grenade". I have submitted tickets to feedback. Not sure if this is a bug, but the USAF Pilot and Jet Pilot are still equipped with M1911A1s.
-
Yes. As you probably now 0.4 was quite a big update. And as the updaters only downloads the pbos which were changed one can assume that it downloaded nearly every pbo.
I see, thanks for the clarification.
-
Hey Variable,
best option is now to use our updater. This one will only download the files which were changed. Unfortunately I currently cannot give you a list of changed pbos.
When I updated USAF from v3.9 to v4.0 I used the updater, and the whole download size was around the size of the whole USAF mod, over two gigs. Is that normal?
-
M240H, M134 or GAU-15/16/18
Thanks for the info :)
Merry Christmas everybody!
-
Actually they are older camos. ^_^
:D :D :D
-
Just to be clear, when I say it won't require CUP with PWS, I mean I'm not going to force you to download it. You'll still need CUP to use the editor units. This will probably change in the future when I release the uniforms and gear separately.
Haha don't worry, I understand :) Merry Christmas!
-
No he was here. He is one of the guys who like "add this ,change that,when you'll add ",who feel entitled no one knows why.
And this I not the only topic where he behaves like that.
Speak for yourself @zio sam, I said no such thing. The Blackhawk suggestion has been I believe my only suggestion on the RHS thread, my only other post here was when I had initially downloaded RHS, and my surprise at the low quality of some vehicles interiors as I didn't realize they had been ported over in a very WIP state to be improved later, and about the lack of reflection on ACOG lenses, which was implemented in v4.0.
Chill out, there was just some heated debate about the subject of "suggestions" a couple days ago, you just were in the wrong place at the wrong time :) .
Got it :)
never seen a US Army Blackhawk mount a 240B. Chairborn ported some Blackhawks, i believe there's a unarmed version in his pack
Okay, thanks for the clarification. What other weapons do Blackhawks mount in door positions?
-
I'm Tim. I'm not too sure how to upload it to Playwithsix but it won't require CUP.
Thank you for this, because on PWS if a mod has a dependency then the dependency must be downloaded before you can download the actual mod.
-
@Aniallator, whilst your suggestion makes perfect sense with our current units, the reason for the MTP in the faction name is that we have other camo patterns in the pipeline.
I see, thank you for clarifying! New camos sound good to me :)
-
It's yet another "request" for something that, if it's actually merits inclusion, will no doubt be added at some point. The reason you're "requesting" it, is because you personally want it right now. And this isn't the only thread I've seen you made such "requests" in.
You doubt unarmed and M240 variants of the UH-60M Blackhawk merit inclusion? Do not presume to know why I made the suggestion, because you don't. Your rudeness is unnecessary and unwelcome, as is your attempt to blame/humiliate me on a personal level by saying "this isn't the only thread I've seen you made such "requests" in." I merely submitted a suggestion because I hadn't seen it submitted before. Please indicate where this exact suggestion has been made to the RHS developers.
-
How about not making unsolicited suggestions?
Please, explain to me why that suggestion is unsolicited.
-
Any chance we can see editor names cleaned up and organized? So we have Air Force, Army, and Navy factions, as opposed to BAF-3CB; BAF-3CB, Army MTP; BAF-3CB Navy MTP; and BAF-3CB AirForce? To simplify it and make the whole thing look neater.
-
A more modest suggestion... how about an unarmed Blackhawk, and an M240 Blackhawk?
-
The only buildings I get this in are the minarets and towers, when going up the spiral stairs.
-
Holy shit this looks amazing, can't wait for PWS version!
-
They're in the 3CB hangar under-going reassembly and conversion work as we speak. If only the instruction sheets made any sense.
A few months (or less, or more) is a likely time frame.
Hey, slow and steady :) Better another high quality vehicle than a poor quality quick release that'll only result in complaint. Looking forward to seeing them in a few months!
-
I guess we'll see Chinooks and updated Merlins in a few months?
-
could be something worth looking into i belive we need to do some more work on the current wreck model befor a editor placed version would look good enough to be worth it but i will put it on list :)
also i loved using the Boeing/SOAR MH-47E by konyo wreck in that was great for mission makeing and just random things so this could add a bit for us
Awesome to hear, hope to see an editor wreck model at some point :) Keep up the good work! Littlebird Down FTW!
-
Callout to the WithSix staff, hope you guys get this mod on WithSix soon after release this weekend.
-
I have a suggestion for the MELB team... that is, implement a Littlebird wreck model we can use in the editor. Using the Blackfoot wreck just gets a bit tedious... so please, please, please? Usable wreck models are really lacking in A3. There are untold Littlebird Down scenarios to be created! At least, consider it. IMHO would be cooler than an UAV Littlebird.
- 1
-
Awesome! Looking forward to more vehicles in the future :)
-
Phew, for a sec there I thought you meant you weren't going to release on WithSix! Guess I'll be getting this mod in January. I use WithSix with every mod I can because it makes keeping mods up-to-date SO much easier. Hope you release WithSix version soooooooon :)I don't have plans for a playwithsix release right now but that's something I'll look into early January.
And yes, any chance we can see some teaser? Three Desert camo teasers please ;)
- 1
Bundeswehr Dingo Reskin for ACR_A3 Dingo
in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Posted
Hi! Nice vehicle, and I've checked it out in the Arsenal... but it doesn't appear anywhere in the editor. So really, I can't use it. I've checked everywhere, it's not present.