Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

Demellion

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    6

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by Demellion

  1. Posted

    23 minutes ago, Grumpy Old Man said:

    That's not how copyright works.

    If you make a painting, you're the copyright owner of it, not the manufacturer of the brush that was used to create the painting.

    Unless your company is seated in a third world country I guess.

     

    The fact that you use and monetize content of others, without giving credit to them, in a way not visible without debinarizing stuff doesn't really put you in a good light.

    Especially since you goof around words and accuse others of "getting upset", when in reality you got caught red handed.

     

    On a sidenote, anyone who's buying stuff from webpages where there's no legitimate phone number or address to be found has it coming.

     

    Cheers

    And to be honest, if we want to hide someone's work, why would we leave that function as it is, even the name, depending on that I personally was expecting products leak sometime, what actually happened here? It's obvious that Arma has no absolute protection of a content you do. As being stated that will be removed if has to be so.

  2. Posted

    21 minutes ago, Grumpy Old Man said:

    That's not how copyright works.

    If you make a painting, you're the copyright owner of it, not the manufacturer of the brush that was used to create the painting.

    Unless your company is seated in a third world country I guess.

     

    The fact that you use and monetize content of others, without giving credit to them, in a way not visible without debinarizing stuff doesn't really put you in a good light.

    Especially since you goof around words and accuse others of "getting upset", when in reality you got caught red handed.

     

    On a sidenote, anyone who's buying stuff from webpages where there's no legitimate phone number or address to be found has it coming.

     

    Cheers

    I think KK never mentioned commercial requirements, neither mentioning his work usage - if I'm wrong I will remove any product parts using his work or mention it on products pages. I do respect his work, since I was actually inspired on some of his articles. Same like everybody does, mostly. But the point is missing still - author is focused on the prices and service way of distribution, not the content in general, as I stated above - that's just not "red handed", that's just "comes in handy" for the author.

     

    About adress - it is actually stated in the bottom of the terms page. Yeah the phone is missing - that should be fixed.

  3. Posted

    46 minutes ago, whiztler said:

    Never even knew or heard of ArmaServices till today. I actually think it is a good initiative as long as they use own/original content/product. I do not mind people offering services to non-scripters, server admins who havent got a clue. I guess there is a demand for their products. But If you ask money for the product you offer on your eCommerce platform then make sure it original work. Including other peoples work, even a small function, even if it was released in public, re-package it and charge money for it without the consent of the original author is just not done.  Period!

    By that statement it results in that no one should ever charge money, since we all use BIS product, but that's a different story. Post author is just getting upset for prices, not the content in the first place - its just a nice addition they've found some KK utility function inside one of the product. I can't remember such negative feed on some other commercial projects like Maverick Applications - because the prices seems to be fine for author. Playing on prejudice "lifers = stealers" is real. Even the product stated here, for example (notification system, watermarks) has nothing around life framework. It does seem like someone just expected to have everything for free, like typical discord visitors with "I wanna script - gimme gimme". That's what I don't get. 

×