nearestObjects issue

[calo_mir 10]

damage.sqm:

_object = this select 0;
_radius = this select 1;

_objects = nearestObjects [_object, ["House"], _radius];
{ _o setDamage 1.0 } forEach _objects;

Created trigger with condition 'true' and:

nul = [b1, 50] execVM "damage.sqm";

Created empty game logic location named 'b1'.

Nothing happens. Arma.RPT says (not exact paste, but it's the only

line in there):

Error position: _objects = nearestObjects [_object, ["House"], _radius];
Expected 3 elements, provided 0.

I'd litter the code with assertions but unfortunately I don't know how

to, for example, assert that a variable is of the right type.

On a side note, the new command line switch (-showScriptErrors)

to redirect script errors to the screen doesn't seem to work.

[f2k sel 145]

Spot the difference your looking for 3 errors.

_object = _this select 0;
_radius = _this select 1;

_objects = nearestObjects [_object, ["house"], _radius];
{ _x setDamage 1.0 } forEach _objects;

[Big Dawg KS 5]

On a side note, the new command line switch (-showScriptErrors)

to redirect script errors to the screen doesn't seem to work.

Works wonderfully for me.

[nuxil 2]

why did you name your file sqm. the right exstention is sqf

[calo_mir 10]

Spot the difference your looking for 3 errors.

_object = _this select 0;
_radius = _this select 1;

_objects = nearestObjects [_object, ["house"], _radius];
{ _x setDamage 1.0 } forEach _objects;

Ugh, '_this' twice and 'house'.

Thanks.

---------- Post added at 04:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:42 AM ----------

Works wonderfully for me.

I should be seeing errors for the above script appearing on the screen,

right?

I still have to look in Arma.RPT.

---------- Post added at 04:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:42 AM ----------

why did you name your file sqm. the right exstention is sqf

I would hope the compiler wouldn't care at all. It doesn't seem to.

[[aps]gnat 23]

you mised _o being replaced with _x

[calo_mir 10]

Gnat;1397522']you mised _o being replaced with _x

UGH!

Thanks.