Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
volkov956

Arma 2 Stability and performance Result

Recommended Posts

System 1

GTS 250 1024

E6850

4GB DDR2

2 640gb 32mb HDD Sata

System 2

GTX 280

955BE

8GB DDR2

1 640gb 32mb

4 320gb Sata in Raid Hardware 0 not software

All using up to date driver except both are using 182.50 Drivers on all Platforms

Test 1 Windows Vista 32bit /Server 2008

System 1 Reasonable Frames no crashes

System 2 Low Frames no crashes

Test 2 Windows Vista 64bit / Server 2008

System 1 Reasonable Frames and crashing

System 2 Reasonable Frames and crashing and stuttering

Test 3 Windows XP 32bit /Server 2003

System 1 Great Frames no crashes

System 2 Great Frames no crashes

Test 4 Windows XP 64bit /Server 2003

System 1 Great Frames and Crashing

System 2 Reasonable Frames and Stuttering and Crashing

All tests took some time

Didnt run arma mark to do the tests though sorry .

Also Tested a System with a

GTX 9800m GTX

E8600

4gb DDR2

1 200gb Sata 16mb

2 200gb Sata 16mb in software raid 0

But it results were pretty much mirroring System 1

Notes:

1. All systems had little or no difference If I used the Very High or Default or High Settings for Video Memory

2. VSYNC Affected neither of the system if on or off as well as Triple Buffering

3. All system were not affected if I used a -winxp or maxmem command

4: Changing Drivers had little to no affect or caused even more problems 182.50 was the most stable in all tests.

5: All were run at the same settings in game

6: Disabling EAX in CFG improved Audio and increased in performance if HW Sound was enabled in most cases.

7: AA, AF, FSAA, Post Processing all set to OFF

8: Shadows High ran better then Low

9: Sound Cards tested were Audigy 1/Audigy 2 ZS/Audigy XFI Elite/Xonar Esscensse STX

10: In 64bit environments to get stutter less was to turn texture detail to low

11: Scopes in Vista 32/64bit XP 64bit 2k3 64bit 2k8 32/64bit where lod was changed causes large texture stuttering

12: SLI was not tested at all I dont recommend SLI for lack of benefit for 2 cards for any game

13: All systems were butchered down to the same basic services no AV/Firewall/Indexing/Superfetch/Application Experience

14: 2k3 and 2k8 were Workstationed during tests to be able to play games properlly

15: all tests where done during Campaign/Editor/CRCTI

16: Physx Disabled but seemed to have no effect

Edited by volkov956

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for all the effort you put into this, but I for one am not going to install windows Xp just to play one game. I am infact tacking this back to the shop for a refund and I shouldn't have a problem getting my money back. After all, it states on the box that it is compatible with windows vista and it is clearly isn't.

Edited by Jackdaniels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
System 1

12: SLI was not tested at all I dont recommend SLI for lack of benefit for 2 cards for any game

Good work, however I strongly disagree with 12.

That is a very broad generalisation which is completly false, out of the 10 odd games I play the only 2 giving me grief are Empire:TW and Arma2.. Everything else is much much better on my dual gpu solution then any single GPU and usually means I can play 60+ FPS min with 8x-16AA 16AF and all details on max.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 3 SLI Options but all give me grief so i just dont bother with SLI much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my only bump incase this info can be helpful to anyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×