ohally 26 Posted September 16, 2010 @aeggwards1 What Pilot are you using? @JDMT A Canadian Man Pack Radio "522" as we call it is in the works. They issued us small packs a few years back that the 522 fits perfectly into so that's what it's going to be modeled as. It probably wont be out for a good little bit however it is near the very top of our list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkEclip 10 Posted September 16, 2010 WOOOOOO Great job guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abs 2 Posted September 16, 2010 Love the machine gunners sticking out the back. Defined as additional turrets? Also, what happens when the turret rotates around? Does it go over their heads? Abs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 16, 2010 They are called "air sentries" lol and in real life they fucking duck if the turret is coming around however the idea is they cover the 6 so the turret doesn't have to. I don't know how they are configured though... AASE got a time line on when i can add the LAV III to the package man? Reference ONS next release. I've been swamped with work, the army, and now hockey so not much time to make major improvements. This weekend I'm working with the army so i wont be able to make any headway. so here's what i can do for everyone. I will be attempting a release on next friday with the major fixes being the following ons_Weapons & ons_weapons_ACE fully animated machine guns, pistol, etc.. created 220rnd belts for the C6s fixed issue with ace chemlights not working adding sight adjust to C6, and all elcan optics for OA vanilla / ACE INKO Disposable HARD CODED ons_Infantry adding 2 new AR textures (TCCC & MEDICAL) adding ISAF patches to some added signaler to ace configs adding M2 Team to ace config and vanilla *possible C6 team with deployable tripod ons_static C6 on Tripod aka SF Role *possible ons_tracked Leopard2 A6M Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aeggwards1 10 Posted September 16, 2010 @aeggwards1What Pilot are you using? BIS USMC pilot for AH1Z, BIS US Army/USMC for AH64D, ANZAC Helicopter pilot for Tiger (inherited from BIS USMC pilot). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 16, 2010 BIS USMC pilot for AH1Z, BIS US Army/USMC for AH64D, ANZAC Helicopter pilot for Tiger (inherited from BIS USMC pilot). I have no idea what's causing this. I will look into the configs for our aircraft, perhaps they are re-defining the animations for these choppers causing the errors. I will do my best, don't expect any immediate results i am very busy right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Young Eagle 0 Posted September 17, 2010 yes Abs, two turrets setup for the cargo seat, when turned out the crews pose like seen in ss, when turned in return to normal cargo pose, at this point only head is freely movable, rest are static. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 17, 2010 Eagle try making it a script instead. just attach the guys in the standing position under the two hatches, that way they will have freedom of movement. If you like I could take a crack at it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abs 2 Posted September 17, 2010 Personally, I think the turret/cargo solution is the best way of going about it, as long as the weapons disappear once you're turned in. Onec you start scripting, then you get into things like MP compatability, etc...and it's a headache. How come you're having trouble with the bodies moving? I'd assume it would be set up just like a MG jeep. Great work, Young Eagle. :) Abs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 17, 2010 good point abs, perhaps your just missing axis points for the 2 sentry positions? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dr@gon 118 Posted September 18, 2010 Hey guys I have a minor problem after installing the latest INKO 1.3 addon. When I launch ARMA 2 Combined Ops I get the following error; Addon 'ons_weapons' requires addon INKO_Disposables I made sure both addons, ONS & INKO are enabled in the game. During gameplay the soldier discards the used M72 like he's supposed to but he also discards a Carl Gustav tube at the same time. I hadn't noticed anything on the forums about this so I thought I'd mention it. Otherwise the game plays fine with both addons. ---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:11 PM ---------- Another problem I have found; As Ohally knows I use the 'ONS_C8A1_M203_SD' weapon but during testing I have found the Elcan sights to be way off. So much so that the weapon is unusable. This only applies when I add the entry in the Initialization field of the editor but works fine when I pull the weapon from the ammo box. Any ideas what might be causing this. I don't have this problem with the RH rifle addons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 19, 2010 Inko changed from inko_disposable to inko_disposable_oa, thats why your getting the error message. no worries though it has been hardcoded into the next update so inko on its own is no longer required unless you wish to use it for the other at weapons. as for the carlg being thrown that makes no sense i will look into it asap. the C8 Elcan issue is also a strange one.. all i can give you is try and use the weapons crate instead from now on? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abs 2 Posted September 19, 2010 Need anything low priority modelled? I can't promise that it'll be quick since I'm still overseas, but I could get started on something non-critical to help out. Abs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dr@gon 118 Posted September 19, 2010 (edited) Inko changed from inko_disposable to inko_disposable_oa, thats why your getting the error message. no worries though it has been hardcoded into the next update so inko on its own is no longer required unless you wish to use it for the other at weapons. as for the carlg being thrown that makes no sense i will look into it asap.the C8 Elcan issue is also a strange one.. all i can give you is try and use the weapons crate instead from now on? Going back to the original ONS download (for the current version) I was able to reinstall the INKO I needed. Unfortunately INKO 1.3 affected the saved games as well since it would say something about a download dependancy and fail to load. The C8 issue is strange indeed. I have gone ahead and loaded the C8 varient I like into the cargo of the various insertion vehicles such as the LAV and helos so I can switch during insertion. The problem is not every mission allows you the opportunity to switch out. One other thing, when you change your load out on the init line you are able to carry both a backpack & an AT weapon - very cool. Once you switch out your primary weapon it drops the backpack. I probably shouldn't rely on the glitch to carry both since a future patch may fix it anyway. To me it is realistic to have light AT Weapons (LAW) liberally spread out in the section and leave the heavier AT Weapons (MAW) to the AT designated soldiers. P.S. I have really been enjoying the mod, good work guys its what I've been waiting for. Edited September 19, 2010 by Dr@gon clarity Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 19, 2010 ABS if you want you can start on the Ruck Sack, Small pack and 522 radio? I can provide ref pics for all of the above if you choose. otherwise our Chinook need to be re-textured to eliminate the mirror image and the Griffon needs some tweaking in the model it's self. let me know your preference and I will send you what you need. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 20, 2010 (edited) New infantry models; Let down the blousing on the pants, some rolled sleeves and a throw back to the early days of Afghanistan, TW tac vests, much cooler IMO Word on the ONS team is the ruck sacks have been modeled once we find them they will be pushed to the top of our list. Update to the pack should be coming soon, sadly the L2A6M may not make it in on time. We will do our best ;) Quick Question for our fans here. I've been thinking of tinkering with the ability do manipulate the bi-pod on the C9 and C6, I.e fold it in or out and deploy it. most likely it will play no affect on accuracy so what do you guys think? should we make the bi-pod interactive? Edited September 20, 2010 by Ohally Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdmt 12 Posted September 20, 2010 I vote yes for the interactive Bi-Pod, as long as it doesn't cause future problems, or performance issues. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 20, 2010 it would be purely cosmetic until we can find a way to make it affect accuracy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted September 20, 2010 it would be purely cosmetic until we can find a way to make it affect accuracy. I'd have a chat with the AAW guys. The way they've done it, IIRC, allows them to affect recoil, dexterity and accuracy... although I'm not sure accuracy should be affected - the gun still shoots straight with a bipod folded up... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 20, 2010 I'd have a chat with the AAW guys. The way they've done it, IIRC, allows them to affect recoil, dexterity and accuracy... although I'm not sure accuracy should be affected - the gun still shoots straight with a bipod folded up... yes but a machine gun has significant recoil. the only place this should affect accuracy is the prone position or supported i.e on a wall etc... that's a good idea though i will have a chat with them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted September 20, 2010 yes but a machine gun has significant recoil. the only place this should affect accuracy is the prone position or supported i.e on a wall etc... that's a good idea though i will have a chat with them. Heh, I think I was probably a bit unclear. What I meant was that the recoil should be affected whether the bipod is up or down, but the accuracy ("dispersion" in the config) should stay the same. So, to summarise; yes. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
abs 2 Posted September 20, 2010 Is...is that a Griffon I see? Oh no wait...it isn't. ;) Abs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ohally 26 Posted September 21, 2010 In hopes to get those ruck models from you asap there abs I have gotten pictures of the griffon for you: ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AASE 0 Posted September 21, 2010 Ive had a look around for the models on my flash drives but i cant find the models so i dont think i have them anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites