AAN - ArmA Navy

[LastNinja9 0]

F***** Awesome! Gnat and EddyD FTW !

Pointless post, I know. Just had to say it, or I wouldn't be able to sleep tonight.

[GodHammer 0]

Outstanding job, guys.

As long as ships enter ArmA universe I will be modeling my favourite missile ever:

SS-N-22 "Sunburn"

Just need somebody modeling a Su-27K to carry it

[MaxRiga 0]

Outstanding job, guys.

As long as ships enter ArmA universe I will be modeling my favourite missile ever:

SS-N-22 "Sunburn"  

Just need somebody modeling a Su-27K to carry it  

Not Su27K but Su33 or Mig29K

But it doesn't change the point, right, we really need one of those models vs already existing F18 and Nimitz

[xnodunitx 0]

By the way, could you adjust the edges so the right ones are sharp and smooth? A retexture is great and all but the lighting will still look horrid if the edges are not corrected.

[GodHammer 0]

Su-27K and Su-33 is the same plane

Would be nice seeing also some helos from russian Navy...

Ka-52 Alligator and Ka-25 Hormone maybe?

[bospor 0]

Is it possible to implement autolanding on the carrier in Arma?

[bospor 0]

I think that the Ka-50/52 will only be used for special forces operations, but Ka-27/29 is dedicated navy workhorse, should be more appropriate for the carrier.

[GodHammer 0]

Yes you are right, I just have spot a beautiful Ka-52 in Navy camo once, on a modelers website, and fell in love with it

Autolanding on those carriers would be a great addon!

Editing: I found the pic, not sure is Navy camo but I still love it Ka-52 is a really nice helo  

[LastNinja9 0]

The only thing I don't like about the Ka-52, is the side by side seating.

The Russians do have the coolest looking military equipment IMO.

[bospor 0]

There was a good Ka-52 addon in OFP by Eugene o Eugeniy (?). Maybe someone can try to transfer it to Arma. I really hate the BIS Ka-50 now, not even close to a real thing. That Ka-52 in OFP even had proper ejection seats; when all the blades would fly out first and than the pilots go one after the other. Looks awesome! But most of all we do need Ka-29 for the carrier.

[Commando84 0]

very nice carrier there! Hoping for some sea battles in arma someday in the future

[GodHammer 0]

I do not understand why they had to put the cannon on the side, leaving all the left part uncovered and unprotected by such a great gun. Eos system is also great ( the one that allow you to lock missiles just by looking at the target ), I enjoyed it in Enemy Engaged II, but the game was a bit too flat, imho.

I could do a reskin of Ka-50, dressing it in Black Shark camo,

I'm building a 1/72 plastic model and I have many good walkaround pictures, but do not ask me to bring in some scripting or animating features, 'cause I'm a ZERO on that stuff

[Gedis 0]

I do not understand why they had to put the cannon on the side, leaving all the left part uncovered and unprotected by such a great gun. Eos system is also great ( the one that allow you to lock missiles just by looking at the target ), I enjoyed it in Enemy Engaged II, but the game was a bit too flat, imho.

I could do a reskin of Ka-50, dressing it in Black Shark camo,

I'm building a 1/72 plastic model and I have many good walkaround pictures, but do not ask me to bring in some scripting or animating features, 'cause I'm a ZERO on that stuff  

what you are talkin about?

this topic is navy related, so no ka-50s/52s and so on...

on the other hand, ka-27PS/PL, ka-29 fits here perfectly

[M.Andersson(SWE) 4]

GNAT, you dont HAVE to make the entire

worlds navy vessels

PLEASE, pretty please...Could you release some

as a "teaser" maby...Please.

[eddyd 0]

little update on the textures

almost don with the texetures , then i send them to Gnat

[Commando84 0]

Looks pretty sweet EddyD can't wait to have 'em ingame.

[Gedis 0]

holy moly, nice textures and i see someone has been fixing  lightning of faces at last! now it looks how it should look, great work.

p.s. just spoted on pictures that elevators still have lightning problems

[Kristian 47]

Soonly Russians will launch full scale assault... VIRTUALLY!

..lol. Nice work eddy and Gnat

BTW: Will this carrier be sinkable?

[eble 3]

Soonly Russians will launch full scale assault... VIRTUALLY!

..lol. Nice work eddy and Gnat

BTW: Will this carrier be sinkable?

Yes carrier is sinkable with enough bombs etc.

[[aps]gnat 28]

Many thanks to eddyD.

Refining the Kuznetsov structure and config a bit at the moment ......

The last three videos from Mandoble might be of interest

http://www.youtube.com/user/valdellar

[wipman 1]

Hi, will be pimp to get on board again of a HH60 in the back of that

OHP frigates again, what's theyr current status?, any progress at

all?. Let's C ya

[Gedis 0]

I love this:

that's why i vote for kuznetsov instead of nimitiz

[malick 0]

Time for some un-polite questions :

I saw in the recent VBS2-vtk video a frigate. It sure looks like one of yours : is it ?

I don't really know how mandoble's scripts work. Will the Kusnetsov engage any air threat (ie not of side "friendly") ? Or do the mission maker have to specify which target to engage ?

We are all waiting patiently for any single floating addon you do ! They do look nice and will be a nice addition to the game !

Malick

[[aps]gnat 28]

Quote[/b] ]I saw in the recent VBS2-vtk video a frigate. It sure looks like one of yours : is it ?

Nope.

Quote[/b] ]I don't really know how mandoble's scripts work. Will the Kusnetsov engage any air threat (ie not of side "friendly") ? Or do the mission maker have to specify which target to engage ?

Nope, it all happens automaticily.

Quote[/b] ]We are all waiting patiently for any single floating addon you do

Yep, very aware that people are waiting .... doing the best I can.

[malick 0]

Quote[/b] ]Yep, very aware that people are waiting .... doing the best I can.

Hehe, don't worry, I said "patiently" !

Malick