Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mr burns

ArmA-Mark

Recommended Posts

Hi Mr Burns,

I just sent you a private PM about this and have support of one site to get this as more of a standard benchmark.

I am all so trying to get a owner of a Great benchmark \ review site to add this to there benchmarks so any help would be good. He is in testing at this time to see if it's good enough to be added to the list of other benchmarks.

IF excepted we SHOULD be looking at benchmarks of arma around the release date of the 4870 x2 which is due in about 3 weeks. IF not and his 4870 x2 is delayed it would end up being a few weeks later..

More explained in PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. 49

2. 47

3. 38

4. 26

5. 37

ArmaMark: 3985

I also tried windowed mode and result were significantly lower: 3092

E8200 @ 3ghz

2gb 800mhz

Asus 8800GTS g92

Abit IP-35e

X-fi XtremeMusic EAX and HW on

Newly installed 64bit Vista SP1 with latest drivers

Arma 1.12b Normal settings @ 1280x1024

simillar here

Q9450

8800GTS SuperSuperClocked

X38 DS4

4 Gig 1066 Ram

Vista 64.

my results are at around 4700. Nothing spectacular but I guess ArmA doesnt make use of my 4 cores.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@fasad

What processor are you using? I only see Intel Core Duo on your specs page

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Test1:22.1533

Test2:23.4347

Test3:20.3051

Test4:12.3178

Test5:19.0356

Total:1944.93 help.gif

AMD 3800+ @2.0 Ghz

XFX 8600 GTS W/256 Ram

2 GB Crucial Ram

Is it my imagination or are my test results really low.

goodnight.gif

8600 GTS => quite low end card.

amd X2 2ghz => equal to 1.5ghz core2duo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@fasad

            What processor are you using? I only see Intel Core Duo on your specs page

E8400.

The database hasn't been properly maintained and there is no specific types of modern CPU. Ah well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@fasad

            What processor are you using? I only see Intel Core Duo on your specs page

E8400.

The database hasn't been properly maintained and there is no specific types of modern CPU. Ah well.

Ok thanks. I'm building a new PC that I'd like it to be ArmA/2 friendly and I'm pretty torn between the E8400 and the Q6600. I've seen the recommended specs. for Arma2 that the Quad is preferred over the Dual but the 8400 seems to do so well in many benchmarks

Hmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dual core pentium 2140 1.6ghz [oclocked to 2.2] really cheap dual core that clock well, 2 gigs 800mhz ram cant rem wich,7600gt nvidia and i get 2574 with all on normal, intersting thing is i have an ati radeon 4850 arriving tommorow will update when i get time tommorow night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Test with Radeon 4870.

Ran my "default" setting with lots of addons and "ECS"...

Resolution: 1680x1050x32

Terrain: High

Object detail: High

Texture detail: High

Shading detail: Very High

Postprocess effects: Low

Anistropic filtering: Very High

Shadow detail: High

Antialiasing: Low

Blood: High

E6600 @3.0

2GB RAM

Saphire 4870 (with Catalyst 8.6 "Hotfix" drivers)

Vista32

On 2nd test: 3771

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice score for those settings.

mrlogik...update on yours?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tip: your FPS can never be higher than your refresh rate smile_o.gif

This is incorrect. My refresh Rate is 60hz and my highest fps was anything over 80fps wink_o.gif

I think what you mean is the vertical Refresh syncronisation(V-sync.) If you turn it on, then your fps is limited to the refresh rate you set. If you turn it off, you have "unlimited" fps.

€dit, here is a pic with Vsync off:

arma%202008-07-20%2002-04-46-46.jpg

And here with Vsync on: arma%202008-07-20%2002-18-44-26.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So how do you turn the Vsync off? That screen doesn't make much sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So how do you turn the Vsync off? That screen doesn't make much sense to me.

You trun it off via the driver settings in Windows. Set it to "always off" or "turn vertical refresh always off"...what it is called depends on your GFX Card and where to find on the tools you're using to tweak settings.

I use ATI tray tools in German, so I donÄt know what it is called in CatalystControlCenter...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A note about v-sync, if you have set 60hz, your graphicscard tries to keep a 60hz update freq to your monitor. if you turn v-sync off you might notice "tearing" if your fps drops below 60fps, thats because your hardware cant keep up and therefore dropping frames in the atempt to keep the 60hz uppdate freq. With v-sync on this never happens because it will never drop frames but instead the game will run slower.

Its debateable witch is better, i think its better to have v-sync on if your hardware can keep up as it gives a nicer image (my opinion). But if it gets really sluggish turn it off as the game wont slow down as much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Test with Radeon 4870.

Ran my "default" setting with lots of addons and "ECS"...

Resolution: 1680x1050x32

Terrain: High

Object detail: High

Texture detail: High

Shading detail: Very High

Postprocess effects: Low

Anistropic filtering: Very High

Shadow detail: High

Antialiasing: Low

Blood: High

E6600 @3.0

2GB RAM

Saphire 4870 (with Catalyst 8.6 "Hotfix" drivers)

Vista32

On 2nd test: 3771

In same option setting, mine is 3950 points at the second test.

my PC spec is

Windows vista x64

Ram 4 GB

8800GT 512MB

E6750@3.2GHz

I think I don't need to upgrade it to ATI HD 4870...

confused_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The link on the first page doesn't work, is there any other place where you can download this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The link on the first page doesn't work, is there any other place where you can download this?

I'd posted the updated link on Page 13. smile_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Video options:

specs.jpg

Result:

results.jpg

My Specs:

Intel Core 2 Duo 3Ghz

PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 4870 512mb

4Gb RAM 800mhz

Windows XP SP2 32bit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The link on the first page doesn't work, is there any other place where you can download this?

I'd posted the updated link on Page 13. smile_o.gif

Added 2nd mirror to our dl, sorry for the inconvenience confused_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Settings pretty much cranked up:

clipboard03vf5.jpg

4321.33 ArmA marks.

Specs:

3,2GHz C2D

Sapphire HD 4870 512MB

4096MB DDR2 800MHz

Win XP 32-bit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Video options:

Result:3093

My Specs:

Intel Core 2 Duo 3Ghz

PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 4870 512mb

4Gb RAM 800mhz

Windows XP SP2 32bit

Hi Para,

with your settings but in 1440x900...i got in the second run

2822 points with a 7900GTO

and

3326 points with a 8800GT

now i would like to know how 260/280 cards perform with these settings...

Found this...

260perf.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First time I started my ArmA biggrin_o.gif just got it by the mail.

Had the test run 3 times.. this one is the last result

Test One - 23.0059

Test Two - 19.4593

Test Three - 28.2467

Test Four - 16.0085

Test Five - 14.3971

OFPMark is 2023.07

Pentium M 1.73 GHz

1024mb RAM

GeForce Go 6800 256mb

Don't have a clue what these numbers say about my notebook. Will be fine tuning my settings now and enjoying this great game biggrin_o.gif

wow....

I have Pentium 4 dual 2.8ghz

1024mb ram

Geforce 6800 GT 256mb

and I got OFPMark: 1400(ish)

and on low everything 800x600 I got 1800(ish)

It bugs me that someone with a notebook just the same as my desktop has twice as good results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
anyone tryed arma with 2560x1600 resolution huh.gif  tounge2.gif

Yes

Anyone whom has a monitor with that native res would see exactly what I see....if they have the card to push it.

Any lower resolution in ArmA is blurred.

ArmA mark did not do so well though, maybe becuase it forces the lower res?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i7 920 on 3.2 GHz (RAM runs at 1600 MHz)

6GB RAM

Zotac GTX 295 (native clocking, but PCIe at 100 MHz)

Windows Vista x86

182.06 Forceware

Arma 1.15 Beta

Letting it run 3x in a row. 3rd time screenshotted.

Resolution = 1280x1024

videooptions.jpg

scores.jpg

I cranked the settings down to High because with the ACE Mod (which brings about 10% less  performance) the FPS dropped below 20 sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, Alienfreak, I was expecting much higher video settings with a system like yours...it's almost exactly the system I'm about to build (but with a Evga gtx 285 SC)...I'm a bit disappointed...I though I could set everything to very high (with 10 km VD) with this kind of rig banghead.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×