ArmA Photography

[Spoock 3]

Nice screens, but are you really playing in 640×480 or did you resize them? They are kinda small

No, I playing in 1024x768

[Xeo 0]

Some new screenshots, mostly from multiplayer

All over 100kb!

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(03).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(04).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(05).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(06).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(07).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(08).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(09).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(10).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(11).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(12).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(13).jpg

http://forrestal.webd.pl/arma/2006-11-14(14).jpg

Sorry for the polish text but i only tested this laungage version

thanks for the pics,good to see they included the xml for ingame profiles and squad info. can i ask what system specs u have forrestal ?

[dm 9]

That UI is blah. I hope it is one of the things we can mod.

If its constructed in any way even remotely similar to OFP, and lets face it chances are high, then it'll be fully modable, just like almost everything else

[l etranger 5]

How does look the medic soldier? is he easy to spot or he doesn't look like different?

[Gart 0]

Any images of ArmA in widescreen yet? Are any of you lucky czech guys playing on widescreens? I'm strongly considering buying such a screen. The only thing I need to clarify is that ArmA looks good on it

I play in Lcd 20" wide ViewSonic VX2025wm in 1680 x 1050

My PC:

AMD 64 3000+

Geforce 6800 GS

2x 512 MB RAM

Arma settings:

http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/9631/arma2006111320373292kopyl9.jpg

Screen

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/1962/arma200611132049gartaz5.jpg

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5653/arma2006111419380800cj5.jpg

http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/1610/arma2006111321105062gb3.jpg

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/481/arma2006111513233010eg2.jpg

[Bunkers 0]

Thank you very much, Gart  

Do you have a screen from 1st person view? The "normal" view with underarm and weapon?

[Gart 0]

Normal view

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/5905/arma2006111515410328ff1.jpg

AK 74

With optic

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3714/arma2006111515404912qp9.jpg

AK 74

[observer 0]

why is there no depth of field in those pics with sights? In other pictures, everything before the focus and behind it was a little blured, why not in your pics Gart?

And do you were aible to put the settings of the anisintrophic filters a little higher? Have nearly the same system and would like to have still nice textures in more distance.

[Cannon Fodder 0]

Gart's settings are here, and on the previous page:

http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/9631/arma2006111320373292kopyl9.jpg

[Placebo 29]

why is there no depth of field in those pics with sights? In other pictures, everything before the focus and behind it was a little blured, why not in your pics Gart?

IIRC DOF is only activated with post process of high or very high......

[ebns72 0]

Something just came to mind that I had totally forgotten. Is that aqueduct-style bridge that was seen to be dynamically destructible anywhere on sahrani? I have yet to see any pitures of it.

EDIT: this one:

http://www.armedassault.eu/images/photoalbum/a1_photo_46.jpg

[NeMeSiS 11]

Something just came to mind that I had totally forgotten. Is that aqueduct-style bridge that was seen to be dynamically destructible anywhere on sahrani? I have yet to see any pitures of it.

EDIT: this one:

http://www.armedassault.eu/images/photoalbum/a1_photo_46.jpg

Its not dynamic, it was just an animation

[Raiden8-PL- 0]

You know what i think when I'm looking at these all screens?

Between low and normal settings is realy big difference, whilst between normal and hight or very hight settings the difference is not so big Maybe I'm wrong but if not, I think it's good for me, becouse I don't have good computer (as I said before: Athlon XP 2600+ , only 512 DDR RAM and GF6600GT with 128 DDR3).

BTW who can tell me, can I dreaming about play Arma with normal setting and hymm... normal FPS ? (about 20)

[mattxr 9]

@ Nov. 15 2006,19:14)]You know what i think when I'm looking at these all screens?

Between low and normal settings is realy big difference, whilst between normal and hight or very hight settings the difference is not so big Maybe I'm wrong but if not, I think it's good for me, becouse I don't have good computer (as I said before: Athlon XP 2600+ , only 512 DDR RAM and GF6600GT with 128 DDR3).

BTW who can tell me, can I dreaming about play Arma with normal setting and hymm... normal FPS ? (about 20)

Considering your PC has the normal specs i betting you can, dont ya read?

[Forrestal 0]

why is there no depth of field in those pics with sights? In other pictures, everything before the focus and behind it was a little blured, why not in your pics Gart?

IIRC DOF is only activated with post process of high or very high......

You can only set LOW or HIGH but maybe i miss something?

[ebns72 0]

Something just came to mind that I had totally forgotten. Is that aqueduct-style bridge that was seen to be dynamically destructible anywhere on sahrani? I have yet to see any pitures of it.

EDIT: this one:

http://www.armedassault.eu/images/photoalbum/a1_photo_46.jpg

Its not dynamic, it was just an animation

Either way, is the bridge in the game?

[Elcle 0]

why is there no depth of field in those pics with sights? In other pictures, everything before the focus and behind it was a little blured, why not in your pics Gart?

IIRC DOF is only activated with post process of high or very high......

You can only set LOW or HIGH but maybe i miss something?

http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/9631/arma2006111320373292kopyl9.jpg

I think there´s Very low, low, normal, high and very high in detail options, so I think there's the same in postprocess:)

[Messiah 2]

yes, you can see it on several of the 'fly over' videos with the blackhawks in the distance.

[AirborneCZ 0]

hidden joke related to OpF

[ig]http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/8897/7untitled3xd9.jpg[/img]>100kb

some other screens

http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/8015/4untitled4nm4.jpg

http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/7273/7untitled2hw5.jpg

http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/5521/7untitled1rg9.jpg

http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/7380/789untitled1zt1.jpg

[mr.bean 0]

lol,

@AirborneCZ

is that a normal civilian outfit?

[Hammer Schultz 0]

Can someone list me all the 16:9 and 16:10 resolutions available (along with the hz's)? I'm planning to play this on 40" Sony full-HD (1080p) LCD-tv and I'm wondering what resolutions are available for it.

[AirborneCZ 0]

Quote[/b] ]AirborneCZ

is that a normal civilian outfit?

there is about 20 and have random skin color and faces

[Gart 0]

why is there no depth of field in those pics with sights? In other pictures, everything before the focus and behind it was a little blured, why not in your pics Gart?

IIRC DOF is only activated with post process of high or very high......

You can only set LOW or HIGH but maybe i miss something?

http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/9631/arma2006111320373292kopyl9.jpg

I think there´s Very low, low, normal, high and very high in detail options, so I think there's the same in postprocess:)

No it´s only low (malý) and high(vysoký) post process

Low post process

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/9949/arma2006111518494843im2.jpg

High post process

http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/7631/arma2006111518491593jp3.jpg

And "hot" blur efect

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/3245/arma2006111519231096qx8.jpg

[Garcia 0]

And  "hot" blur efect  

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/3245/arma2006111519231096qx8.jpg

That's neat...do planes have this effect too? I mean, you get some sort of heat blur effect from jet engines? That would be really nice

[Forrestal 0]

Nice res and quality but what about FPS?