DaSquade 0 Posted July 6, 2006 ..;But a big thanks for your great work BB. You also set a very profesional level in OFP world! I hope you enjoyed spending your time on making all the your stuff you and to what has been donated. Much appreciated! I wish you all the best with your plans in the future (RL). Lets hope one day you make it back into ArmA or what ever...Skills like yours are rare! Good luck... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elite SEAL 0 Posted July 7, 2006 Thanks for your contributions to OFP dude, your addons will always be some of my favourites. Cheers, and good luck with the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dkell3 0 Posted July 7, 2006 Thank you for all you have done Blackblood.I wish you luck in the future Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stgn 39 Posted July 7, 2006 where should I post SCAR links now? best of luck BB. STGN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1181 Posted July 7, 2006 Post them here, I'll be able to put them to use when Blackblood sends me the project. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 7, 2006 It's with great sorrow i'm writing this, my OFP compadres.Due to a great personal tragedy i'm gonna leave this wunderful place on the web. The SCARS are being packed and waiting on the tarmac for Air SJB to take over. I know Jackal will do wonders with 'em (and probably release it a lot sooner than yours truly would). I would like to express my deepest gratitude to you all for some great and fun years in this community.  Blackblood Well didnt see that coming we'll all miss ya BB your one of the elite  Good luck with everything mate cya whenever And jackal you will relase the SCARs wont you  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1181 Posted July 8, 2006 ...And jackal you will relase the SCARs wont you  ... Of course, just need to receive the relevent files from BlackBlood and see what needs to be done to them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heatseeker 0 Posted July 8, 2006 I hope its not that much of a tragedy . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 8, 2006 ...And jackal you will relase the SCARs wont you  ... Of course, just need to receive the relevent files from BlackBlood and see what needs to be done to them. good ol jackal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HoboWithAK 0 Posted July 10, 2006 sorry to hijack a little BB, hope you dont mind, as these are your updated troops:http://www.project-ukf.com/Messiah/images/Sig/sig22.jpg http://www.project-ukf.com/Messiah/images/Sig/sig24.jpg (and yes they'll come without llauma heads) although it seems BB has a trick under his collar those silencers etc that wipman posted... are they yours BB? They're stunning to say the least That Noveske muzzle attachment IS NOT A SUPPRESSOR. It was designed for short barreled AR weapons, to focus the muzzle blast forward and create more backpressure to eliminate gas flow problems, which were causing short stroking and other problems with the ARs gas system. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 11, 2006 jackal being as youve told people to post here with information this site has been recently updated with more images CLICK ME Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stgn 39 Posted July 11, 2006 I must say that is a radical design change so late in the development just kidding. Enyway latest gosip is that SF are looking for a AR15(not HK416 or Colt 1020) based rifle/carbine to replace wornout M4A1's and maby even the FN SCAR(its said too be not user friendly). STGN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 11, 2006 if its not broken don't try to fix it? i think the saying is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted July 11, 2006 I must say that is a radical design change so late in the development just kidding.Enyway latest gosip is that SF are looking for a AR15(not HK416 or Colt 1020) based rifle/carbine to replace wornout M4A1's and maby even the FN SCAR(its said too be not user friendly). STGN Why wouldnt they want a HK416? I hear they like them alot, and those that mean theyre canceling SCAR? @Helping_hand: What was that thing in your pic? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1181 Posted July 11, 2006 Its the laser range finder which is used in conjunction with the EGL to accurately pitch rounds onto targets (AFAIK). I've been doing my homework you see Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 11, 2006 hmm that was supposed to be a link sowwi jackal Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 (check the first pic ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1181 Posted July 11, 2006 Good job I don't need any technical info from that page, its all in Chinese (or similar). Pictures will come in handy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stgn 39 Posted July 11, 2006 one reply since this is kinda offtopic: The HK416 is having reliability problems tested against the Mk18 it lost a over the beach contest. And unofficial rumors say they are having problems in Afganistan and Iraq. other than that it is heavy especial in the front when compared too a M4A1. The Colt 1020 is not finished yet. The SCAR is said to be less ergonomic than AR15, especial the stock has been critisised. It is also bigger and bulky compared too the Ar15. Why do you think the Flashheider sits reversed(down-up) on the barrel, the gun has "negativ"(downwards) recoile so too compensate the muzzel flash is directed downwards, I would imagine it kicks a bit of dust up. and last but not least it is not finished and still in development first too be deployed in 2008 and SF's needs new weapons now. I need too stress that the SCAR is not cancled(low production has just started I imagine its the 125+ guns the contract describes) if a new upper or ar15 based weapon is found it will most likely have too compeat against the SCAR for selection. If a new Ar15 based weapon is selected I am sure it will have a true quick change barrel(less than 10 sec like a lmg), be piston operated, Free Floated, Monolithic, problery be able too fire just after comming out of water. can't think about enything els right now. STGN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 12, 2006 Good job I don't need any technical info from that page, its all in Chinese (or similar). Pictures will come in handy right click translate page into english  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted July 12, 2006 one reply since this is kinda offtopic:The HK416 is having reliability problems tested against the Mk18 it lost a over the beach contest. And unofficial rumors say they are having problems in Afganistan and Iraq. other than that it is heavy especial in the front when compared too a M4A1. The Colt 1020 is not finished yet. The SCAR is said to be less ergonomic than AR15, especial the stock has been critisised. It is also bigger and bulky compared too the Ar15. Why do you think the Flashheider sits reversed(down-up) on the barrel, the gun has "negativ"(downwards) recoile so too compensate the muzzel flash is directed downwards, I would imagine it kicks a bit of dust up. and last but not least it is not finished and still in development first too be deployed in 2008 and SF's needs new weapons now. I need too stress that the SCAR is not cancled(low production has just started I imagine its the 125+ guns the contract describes) if a new upper or ar15 based weapon is found it will most likely have too compeat against the SCAR for selection. If a new Ar15 based weapon is selected I am sure it will have a true quick change barrel(less than 10 sec like a lmg), be piston operated, Free Floated, Monolithic, problery be able too fire just after comming out of water. can't think about enything els right now. STGN Interesting about the HK416 reliabilty issues, surely if they plan to buy SCARs in the future, but need new guns now they'll just buy more M4s and save money on a proven design? Or do they need a better design? I know that the M4 has a somewhat bad reputation but how much better can they get without turning to the likes of the HK416 or the Colt 1020? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stgn 39 Posted July 12, 2006 well they are going towards the HK416 and colt 1020 just not these two desigs they want somthing better. Soon to go official a SF group I belive has bought a batch of these(just in 14.5): LW photo a LW SOC a piston driven upper it only changes the bolt carrier and gas tube too a piston system. LW a company which aparently is suplying protype weapons to SOCOM. Why not buy M4A1s well I belive they stil order small amunts once in a while but if your going too replace a weapon system building up stock dosen't seem like the best Idear, also if you signal that the old system is still good enough why use lots of money on a new one? Hope this makes a little sence. STGN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted July 12, 2006 why don't you start a topic in the off topic thread for this because i think mor than us three will be intrested for instance the the ar15 forums there is a topic debating just this offtopic Click Me P.S just as an addition to this message save me posting in the SJB thread Click Me For Videos (Soudns May Come In Useful) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaSquade 0 Posted July 13, 2006 A bit offtopic, meaning OFP doesn't support custom grenade laucher animations and animated riffle parts (yet?). Anyway, came across this piece of info regarding the EGLM i didn't knew yet: http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_02.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_03.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_04.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_01.jpg Source: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=80545&page=9 [posted question] Does anyone know if the EGLM (Enhanced Grenade Launcher Module) is breach or side loading? --> Side-loading. That was also part of the EGLM requirements. Anyway, meaning it doesn't work like the common M203, but it slides open and it can be turned sideways for easier reloading. Didn't knew myself and though it was very informative to know. In the end, this feature won't be possible (even in ArmA as afaik dual axis rotations in ArmA will still not be supported ). On the other hand thought it is some good info for those that want to know more about this riffle and 'how does it works'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Messiah 2 Posted July 13, 2006 A bit offtopic, meaning OFP doesn't support custom grenade laucher animations and animated riffle parts (yet?).Anyway, came across this piece of info regarding the EGLM i didn't knew yet: http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_02.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_03.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_04.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h90/REMOV/_EGLM_01.jpg Source: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=80545&page=9 [posted question] Does anyone know if the EGLM (Enhanced Grenade Launcher Module) is breach or side loading? --> Side-loading. That was also part of the EGLM requirements. Anyway, meaning it doesn't work like the common M203, but it slides open and it can be turned sideways for easier reloading. Didn't knew myself and though it was very informative to know. In the end, this feature won't be possible (even in ArmA as afaik dual axis rotations in ArmA will still not be supported ). On the other hand thought it is some good info for those that want to know more about this riffle and 'how does it works'. side loading isnt done because its easier to reload, it means it allows a larger round to be used in the weapon than could be used in a M203. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackal326 1181 Posted July 27, 2006 As I am yet to receive the files from Blackblood, and as I have not heard from him in almost two weeks, I'm unable to work on the project. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites