X-ander-EPP- 1 Posted December 30, 2001 The hind is a nonsense copter,why do you want to transport troops in it when mainly it´s used for combat areas and bombing activities?i´d rather choose an apache for the same purpose..more fast and more dynamic.. If anyone says that a t-80 is better than a m1a1 they haven´t played this game a s**t,yOu need up to 4 or 5 sabot hits to merely damage an abrams when with two or three you can disable a t-80. why do you want auto burst in a rifle? youR accuracy goes to -50 plus the recoil iS UNCONTROLLABLE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpaceAlex 0 Posted December 31, 2001 Both sides are good but i also think that US vehicles are better. I'm usually west in MP. I always take down the HIND or any other chopper with apache or cobra with no gunner. I'm using my front cannon. Apache and Cobra are more accurate and lively. I have nothing against HIND. I love to fly with HIND. I can take down an Apache with no gunner in HIND too but it takes more time because it's bigger. The good thing is that armor is a lot better. As for Mi-17 and UH-60. I won't say nothing. We all know that Mi-17 rocks. Choppers are similar but US choppers are more lively. I love them more than East choppers. As for the tanks. Well. M1A1 is the best. If you meet him in T-72 you better disembark and hide in a bush(If u play SP save the game and take M1A1 down). If u meet him in T80, hide the tank and attack from the side. Otherwise, disembark. As for the M60. Those tanks are crap tanks. It's better for u that u don't use them. T72 is far better. T72 can take down M60 with one or two sabots. BMP, BMP-2 vs Bradley. They are similar. M113 is crap against any tank. It's only good for killing medium armored forces. Overall, both sides are similar but US side still have M1A1's. So, it's better. As for rifles. I personally prefer M16. Sound of it is much better than AK and it's bigger and i love it. You don't need full Auto. You're out of ammo in a second. I can kill a lot more soldiers with M16. And AK is not more accurate. For far distances M16 is much better. As for other weapons. Well. M21 is better than SVD Dragunov, M16 is better in real life and in the game, Bizon is better than HK, lounchers are the same. Steyr and G36 absolutley rulez. Overall, weapons are similar. But M16 rulez. Don't say that AK sound is better, because it isn't. I love vehicles from both sides. You can use all of the vehicles. No matter which side you are. Sometimes Russia is better, sometimes Us is better. It's your call. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miles 0 Posted December 31, 2001 remember that the russian equipment looks far better, especially the pk, the most beatiful weapon in the game. Also i would much rather play a russian with character than the idiot drone of the american army (sorry thats a little steriotypical but your forces are hardly the most competent) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silencer 0 Posted December 31, 2001 Tanks:the russian shilka is the best tank in the game! its better than those tanks where you have to reload between shots...I made a little mission with 50 west soldiers ,few adrams,and I went as a silka and I killed them all!the bad part about is it has low armour sometimes I get killed by that resistant tank.(Russian wins) sniper:The dragnov is a good sniper its very accurate if you use the sights on the scope... the american m21 is lame the scope looks like a classic old scope. (Russian wins) well ,both sides has same fire power except the russians have more automatic weapons...I tryed the m16 once and the iron sights are more comfortable.... (yanks wins) soo overall the russians win even htought the americans have more stuff rocket perpelled grenades are sweet too! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krechet1 0 Posted January 1, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Xander on 11:21 pm on Dec. 30, 2001 The hind is a nonsense copter,why do you want to transport troops in it when mainly it´s used for combat areas and bombing activities?i´d rather choose an apache for the same purpose..more fast and more dynamic.. If anyone says that a t-80 is better than a m1a1 they haven´t played this game a s**t,yOu need up to 4 or 5 sabot hits to merely damage an abrams when with two or three you  can disable a t-80. why do you want auto burst in a rifle? youR accuracy goes to -50 plus the recoil iS UNCONTROLLABLE <span id='postcolor'> in real life Hind is about x2 faster than Apache mostly due to two monster engines and very aerodynamic shape. So "Crocodile" is much faster and maneuvrable than Apache. and in real life you have no idea how many lives that "nonsense helicopter" saved with its ability to carry troops. The only downside on the Hind was lack of doorguns (making crew's AKS-74U the only personnal defence once on the ground), but it was fixed with Hinds flying in pairs or with Mi-8s/mi-17s which usually do have doorguns plus firing ports for infantry inside (Hinds technically have those ports too but its too cramed to use them effectively). So dont bash "crocs" untill you've seen them in action... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barret 0 Posted January 1, 2002 Check out the poll on the website listed in my signature! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barret 0 Posted January 1, 2002 Heres what I got from my website so far: The russian helicopters have to many rockets though the americans have better planes, and infantry weapons. Introduction of the Bizon leaves the rest lying in the dirt Is it better than the HK? Russkies don't need great weapons since they ournumber US forces by at least 5 to 1 I think Russia had an "OVERKILL" with their military during the cold war MI-17 ROXORZ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
