Jump to content
x3kj

Patent for UFO by US Navy (gravitational generator)

Recommended Posts

Found this patent text mentioned on the web somewhere: "HIGH FREQUENCY GRAVITATIONAL WAVE GENERATOR"

I have no idea if it is legit... at least the amount of patent-lingo-bullshit checks out 😄 Its very intriguing, seeing they made videos of "flying tic tac" public not too long ago.

(for reference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf1uLwUTDA0 ), there have also been claims of a navy contractor to have witnessed the observation of "USO" (unidentified submarine object) onboard a submarine that move way too fast to be of any known.vessel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcDwHxTbGTk ). The observations match the movement abilities that are adressed by the patent(s) as being possible due to some vacuum generated around the vessel, which allows it to pass trough any medium without resistance.  With trillions of $ disappearing in government funding i wouldnt be shocked if they are trying to build a fleet of these "ufo".

 

here are other patents with us navy as assignee (with the purpose of license-free manufacturing and usage of vessels using those inventions)

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2 Craft using an inertial mass reduction device

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20180229864A1 Plasma Compression Fusion Device

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190058105A1 Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor

 

 

edit: i found some site that gives info on the inventor listed for those patents https://hyperspace.engineer/
edit2: (note, i would disregard all of the other patents from other authors on that site... they just seem like gibberish rubbish)

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

US20060071122A1

Quote

Full body teleportation system
A pulsed gravitational wave wormhole generator system that teleports a human being through hyperspace from one location to another.

 

uh... Smells fishy 🤔

 

US20060145019A1

I have seen pictures of this "Triangular spacecraft" before.. On some UFO Hunter documentary on some TV Channel atleast 5 years ago.

 

US20060072226A1

Quote

An apparatus which enhances the ability of a person to perform remote viewing by connecting the human spiritual eye to the tetrahedral geometry of subspace.

 

I'm open to weird ideas, but this just sounds cray cray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Dedmen said:

US20060071122A1

 

uh... Smells fishy 🤔

 

US20060145019A1

I have seen pictures of this "Triangular spacecraft" before.. On some UFO Hunter documentary on some TV Channel atleast 5 years ago.

 

US20060072226A1

 

I'm open to weird ideas, but this just sounds cray cray.

To be clear, i only meant the patents of Salvatore Cezar Pais. The ones listed on that site from John Quincy St. Clair seem like utter rubbish - the assignee isnt the united states government either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I came across CiA (not the clan) doing tests on that remote viewing a while ago, found some unclassified reports from their website:
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00787R000300110001-8.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R002600250001-6.pdf
 

Here's the Nimitz one, pretty intriguing video

 

As someone within the science discipline (BSc, MSc Biomedicine) generally I find all the 'evidence' presented as quite simply not evidence, witness testimony on its own regardless of who is giving it is the worst form of scientific evidence, then usually its a crappy video or photo, at best an anomalous  radar contact with someone saying they saw something. However this video above is one of the few ones which is genuinely intriguing, while there is nowhere near enough data to go with it and it could and likely is something other than 'visitors' it still leaves that possibility open due to the fact of its movements which (and I may be wrong here) as far I am aware, we do not posses or are even able to create in the next 100 years as they seem not to be adhering to our current understanding of physics. Anyway, my two cents on it, but yeah the rest and those cia RV programs, do not convince me in the slightest 🙂
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/8/2019 at 2:43 AM, Dedmen said:

US20060145019A1

I have seen pictures of this "Triangular spacecraft" before.. On some UFO Hunter documentary on some TV Channel atleast 5 years ago.

 

Heh, old thread but just stumbled on this - i seen one of those from my condo porch out in Boulder, Colorado some 8 years ago. Im not a conspiracy/UFO'ey minded person and generally debunk things more than i believe in them. But damned if i wasnt just sitting on my roof porch -enjoying a fall evening when a triangle shaped thingie with three points of light flew right over my roof - and close! The weird thing is it made no sound, like zero, and even stranger -it didnt seem like it was even flying thru propulsion -it was just moving and fast.

 

 Funny thing is i was on the phone and just got stunned, telling my buddy "i think i just saw a UFO....yeh right..". I lived maybe a mile from a small aircraft Airport and knew all the flight patterns well as they launched and landed all thruout the day -my house was definitely not on that path and this thing seemed right over my head.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's nothing conspiratorial or theoretical about UFOs as far as I'm concerned. They are exactly what the acronym suggests. Otherwise they wouldn't be referred to as such. Unfortunately there's a lot of baggage with that particular description. It's likely discouraged many honest, observant people from ever reporting what they've seen. 🙂

 

Public and scientific dismissal, out of hand, has been the norm. And of course ridicule.  Considering the depth of the phenomenon and the confirmation by the US navy recently , it's surprising people still have such an attitude. Old habits die hard I suppose.

 

The evidence is pointing to something unusual being in the skies around the world. What it  is, is open to debate. But we certainly will never know if serious unbiased investigation is avoided at every opportunity.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/4/2020 at 5:47 PM, Macser said:

it's surprising people still have such an attitude. Old habits die hard I suppose.

 

Not really, most people do not care or can be bothered to go far, if at all beyond headlines and get their information through either mainstream media, including History channel and similar, or some sort of shill/gatekeeper alternate version of the same directive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×