Jump to content
vilas

ACTA2 voted today by EU

Recommended Posts

ACTA2 voted today by EU  , cenzorship in internet in EU countries soon begin , sad day for freedom in EU 

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, they caved. Crazy money must be thrown at this as they bought or extorted so many votes since last time. Truly a sad day.

Still, not all is lost yet. Stay vigilant European brothers and friends of good across the world.

 

Here is just another summary for anyone not familiar but please, feel free to look for more.

 

 

 

Russia seems to have implemented something similar as well.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The EU parliament is up for vote soon. Make damn sure that the politicians and parties who let themselves be bought for this shit do not get your vote!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another directive upcoming - called TerReg - called terrorist regulations - but in fact it contents cenzorship laws, which may be used against freedom of speech under "racism, xehophobia" and etc.

 

TerReg - please google yourselves, it says that websites should take down withing 1 hour any not apropriate violent extremist content - and looking what politicians do nowadays - they will take down any conservative politic ideas but won't take down real terrorist-content calling for example to set sharia law etc.

 

we start to live in madness - calling to kill atheists or Christians is okay, calling to put jihadists to prisons is racism, xenophobia, nazism, extremism  etc. with such regulation any non-left content may be removed from internet (as we know far-left terrorism is no longer counted as terrorism) and no chance for democratic diversity of opinions of any political side

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Terrorism has become something like Victorinox knife for politicians. It can be a universal excuse for any kind of crap done by them and for any amount of money they want to spend. Even despite the fact that simple diseases like flu or car accidents take much higher tolls of victims every year than the terrorism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

western europe in past used to had biggest number of freedoms, freedom of speech etc. full democracy etc.

now it changes, in France people are beating every day , martial law and west seems to not speak about it,

politicians in the name of "tolerance" "modern values" change our continent into more and more control of citizen, less and less freedoms (gun issue, property itself is being discused because they praise marxist Altiero Spinelli in EU, freedom of speech etc)

 

and number of victims - i believe that even single victim is too much but to destroy terrorism they avoid to find real reason of terrorism - religious freaks praising sharia , but they finding "extreme" people who want to live like our fathers and grandfathers, people who are traditional are "extreme",

nowadays "extreme" is to be like you was raised by your grandmother and "extreme" is being patriot - which was normal 50 years ago , nowadays "extreme" it to say that 2 gays cannot give birth (which is natural from biological point of view, but "modern europe" deny even biological differences between man and woman which is crazy for Poles, Russians , Hungarians)

 

the biggest terrorists are politicians themselves causing mixing non compatible cultures in one land, terrorists are CEOs' of corporations which abuse other countries to export profit to corporation-hq location from "third world countries" , terrorists are CEOs' of banks,

 

thats why they want to control and cenzor the internet - because in the internet there are independent media which show movies that mainstream (government media or corporations media) will never show (movies from attacks of "refugees" on natives, movies from yellow vest beaten by French Police because they do not want to pay such high taxes for lazy non-working benefits taking people), they want to ban it all and only information (information = voters) that would exist will be "politically correct" - despite it is lie

 

many many young people in my land do not watch TV and "official propaganda", they watch youtube channels to find truth , not lies given by big corporations which produce fake-news  (the best example I remember was showing that "majority of refugees are ill old people and small children and woman" and than camera shown boats full of only adult strong men) ,

so EU politicians want to ban YT from Europe because on YT you can find real news - you can see how muslims attack women on street , how they beat someone and say that atheists and christians must be killed etc. you can see riot police in France beating taxpayers who work hard not sitting on benefits, you can see news from countries like Brunei where sharia law set punishment of 5 years in prison for showing-off Santa-Claus hat or Christmass Tree , this is truth they want to hide, they want to hide movie when LGBT activist threatens someone for being heterosexual,

they want to hide movies showing when far-left politician says that property of individual people should be confiscated to give it to refugees and gays - such things are not shown in mainstream media because they show corruption and moral zero of those left wing politicians, YT media inform about true stuff from WW2 history , noone in mainstream will say that Jews were leading Stalin era secret police - such things are only in independent media that politicians want to hide because they deal with Israel

 

the biggest victim of "counterterrorism" is truth ,

people in democracy should know all facts and vote depending on their belief - but they must know fact

if people are misinformed that democracy is senseless - how can someone vote if he knows only half of facts  ?

 

real freedom of choice depends of things we know - than we go and put our vote in elections , we vote for what is good for us depending on informations we know,

the most important is that we should know all , than we can vote "if this or that is chosen"

 

cenzorship is worst thing killing sense of democracy, in democracy people vote but first they must know facts and have full information - like in court, judge has information from prosecutor and from  advocate , than he decides,

the same is sens of democracy - we see all "forensic" information and we decide - to vote on A or B or C

 

after all those Actas Terregs democracy will be fake - i see it in mainstream media - for example only left wing parties are being introduced in studio by journalist, so voters who only watch TV do not even know that other parties exist, they seen in TV broadcast with party A, B, C, but there exist party D, E, F - but they are never introduced to mainstream media, but they have their channels on YT which EU want to ban - which is antidemocratic

 

2 biggest TV stations in my country which belong to big foreign corporations never introduced "National Movement" politicians to studio - is this democracy ? this is not democracy when they introduce only "Catholic Socialists" "Left Wing Ally" "European Democrats" "European Socialist" to studio - this is not democracy , all parties should be introduced and people should vote for which is closer to them

 

what is sens to discuss in studio with people who all are left-wing ? but such things happen in mainstream media belonging to corporations

governmental TV informs only about ruling party , and only YT channels show that there are other parties and that there are other facts , they never introduce conservative economist to studio, never , they never introduce economist who would say "taxes should be lower, we should cut benefits because it makes people lazy, we should cut spendings on government because ministry spends too much on changing furniture for officials, money spent on limousines for state officials are wasted money"

 

they only introduce economist who says "we should focus on spending more on benefits and we must find way to tax more" , they never introduce someone who would say "you should have gun in your house and right to shoot burglar because your property is the most important for you" - never , such people are only on YT and in USA (there is democracy, there is freedom of speech) - European politicians afraid because we want to live similar to Americans and have similar rights

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, vilas said:

so EU politicians want to ban YT from Europe because on YT you can find real news

Maybe you don't know but YouTube is a part of large trans-national corporation for several years already. And it has already quite effective censorship mechanism. It may be one of several information sources but not the only one.

3 hours ago, vilas said:

they want to hide movies showing when far-left politician says that property of individual people should be confiscated to give it to refugees and gays

WAT? Are you serious?😅

This reminds me an old joke:

- Mr. Rabinovich, why do you want to leave Russia?

- I am not pleased with current attitude to homosexualism.

- But what does upset you?

- Come on, during Stalin's reign a person could be imprisoned for it, during Brezhnew's reign - could be placed to mental disease clinic, now homosexualism is free to practice and show.

- So... What's wrong?

- I want to leave before homosexualism becomes mandatory here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/5/2019 at 1:00 PM, spooky lynx said:

WAT? Are you serious?😅

 

there was similar statement by not only one politician, 

one of previous government officials from party that ruled Poland before 2015  said that people must pay taxes to finance blocks of flats for refugees and flats built by state should be only for refugees and never for natives, 

other politician from previously ruling party, now opposition, said that LBGT should get flats free from payment for hire, 

and in France one left wing politician said that white people should not have children to give space to non-white in Europe (Yves Cochet) 

look at this - anti-white racism - police do not want white males, they say they do want women or non-white : 

we have several left wing politicians saying that for example we natives must pay bigger taxes to fund flats free of charge for non-natives etc. 

so such things in EU do exist, such loonies which should be treated as menatlly ill - are politicians leading "pro-european modern movement"

and for example this:

 

link_I2EGt43QJL82iQ7rNGiexAZJA2DI3Fgp,w1

 

or this:

 

coudenhove01.jpg

 

 

 

or they hide that person whose name is on EU parliament - Altiero Spinelli said that property should be redefined and he denied right to property (communism) 

 

guy who denied right to private propery - Altiero Spinelli is now name of main building of EU Parliament - this is sick totally sick 

 

 

worth quoting 

 

so we natives in Europe became enemies of leading EU politicians - so they want to set cenzorship in Acta2 or TerReg form - to block our mouths to punish for thoughts - like in Orwell book Year 1984 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3823706/European-human-rights-chiefs-orders-British-press-NOT-reveal-terrorists-Muslims.html?fbclid=IwAR04J5AIl9f_6R0JJg6wh0Bw6sx4aureWBcOXPup2SAif3KJF0Wym0OhIkk

 

EU becomes Year 1984

 

 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ACTA2 isn't about politcal censorship, it's an aggressive copyright enforcement policy. That doesn't make it any less ill advised, but misconstruing its nature and basis is not constructive.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ACTA2 wants prevention checks , cenzorhip in fact, YT CEO said that due to Acta2 YT in EU may be closed, so when YT is closed all independent broadcast disappear from EU 

 

https://www.stopacta2.org/en/

 

prevent filter is in fact cenzorship

 

link and quotes - how can someone quote politician words in other agency when other agency has copyright and do not want to allow quote  ? 

 

copyrights should be protected completly other way, simply there should be told that piracy is when someone copy movies, photography, music, gaming-parts etc. than action is taken against him etc. 

but not preventive filters , not blocking links or quotes , than it is cenzorship, 

similar to terreg when extremism is not defined , regulations should go into more and more freedoms, not less and less, 

there should be freedom of speech guaranted and for example websites like FB should be punished for cenzorship and their politics which bans patriotic profiles of people - so this is crime against freedom of speech 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, vilas said:

ACTA2 wants prevention checks , cenzorhip in fact, YT CEO said that due to Acta2 YT in EU may be closed, so when YT is closed all independent broadcast disappear from EU

If that truly is the case then I agree, it is a serious concern. I would however hesitate to describe youtube as the only source of independent media.

 

12 hours ago, vilas said:

there should be freedom of speech guaranted and for example websites like FB should be punished for cenzorship and their politics which bans patriotic profiles of people - so this is crime against freedom of speech  

Given the kind of people they have focused most of their efforts on banning, I can't help but feel this is stretching the meaning of 'patriotism'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/6/2019 at 8:34 PM, target_practice said:

If that truly is the case then I agree, it is a serious concern. I would however hesitate to describe youtube as the only source of independent media.

 

Given the kind of people they have focused most of their efforts on banning, I can't help but feel this is stretching the meaning of 'patriotism'.

 

they ban people for telling historical truth , for example about crimes of Israel (crimes against Palestinians) or Jews (in Communist secret police NKVD or UB)  or Muslims (terrorism, WW2 in SS against Serbs and orthodox Christians)  so they ban for truth , freedom of speech is not existing in western europe just as not in FB - but everyone blame Putin for being non-democratic, lol, if Putin was only person who make cenzorship laws, lol , all "hate speech" laws are in fact cenzorship , now even historical truth is endagred cause you cannot say about that many Jews were in NKVD/UB, you cannot say that Israel commits crimes on Palestinians, you cannot say Muslims make attacks and were voluntary joining SS during WW2 killing Serbs (official version is that Serbs are "bad guys") etc.

they even ban critics of feminism-looney and gender-looneys , they ban hunters for showing off hunting trophys (hunting exists since thousands of years and human eat meat ), so we have global problem of vanishing freedom of speech, we had freedom of speech in 00's nowadays in 2019 we start to have more and more cenzorship and rewriting history (Jews deny that Poles were also huge group of victims of holocaust etc) , we really start having problem with cenzorhip over internet , and every one just blames Putin for his laws , but west and FB does the same and it is shame, cause cenzorship is part of communism, we fought against communism because we hated cenzorship just as we hated confiscation of property, now we face cenzorship again in our lives (we - i mean people like me, from "eastern"  Europe which lived in communism before 1989 and now communism returns, fight against tradition, fight agains property , social benefits for lazy non working bastards, cenzorship, limitation of gun laws upcoming etc. i hate communism and commies because they limit freedoms  )

 

freedom should treat all people equally - if nation A commited crime over nation B - we can say it, but when nation C commited crime against nation D - suddenly we cannot say "because it is racism, hate speech" etc. ? wtf

all nations, all religions should be treated equally - all people should be treated equally , without "holy cows" -  musicians tear and burn Holy Bible on stage - is anyone is in prison for it ? well - try to do the same with Quoran or Tora - is it eqality ? why noone punishes for defamation of Catholics ? what about Armenians holocaust by Ottoman Empire etc. ?

we have people (in EU or USA) which are in prison for "hate crimes" - we also have "artists, musicians" which burn Bible on stage - and courts say it is "freedom of expression",

we must have laws that treat people, religions equally - without special right of anyone, and this should be guaranted by freedom of speech - without any cenzorship or bans - there should be no holy cows otherewise we do not have any democracy , democracy rely on freedom of speech and equal treatment of any competitor

 

the same problem is with sending toxic trash/waste - i know people who were banned on FB when they re-posted posts / links with informations about current Canada-Philipne  waste "war" (similar problem Poland has with Germany but Polish gov is soft), Indian farmers vs GMO corporation from USA ? the same , so FB cenzorship IS HUGE PROBLEM

p.s.

i was banned several times for quotes of what Quoran or Talmud says about nonbelievers/others (for quotes) so do not tell me about wrong patriotism if we cannot even quote Talmud (or Rabin Ovadia Bin Josef who said that non-Jews are born to be slaves of Jews) or Quoran "infidels are worse than animals" etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/5/2019 at 4:00 PM, spooky lynx said:

Maybe you don't know but YouTube is a part of large trans-national corporation for several years already.

YT is not a part of trans-national corporation. But this corporations can buy fake accounts for a banning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×