Apex Weapon Feedback

[Randodom (DayZ) 0]

Can not fit the CMR-76 rifle in backpacks even though its 6.5mm just like MXM and both of them are the same size (CMR-76 is slightly smaller even)

 

[peegee 118]

Maybe the reasoning behind it is that MXM has a detachable modular stock. Whereas CMR does not. I could be wrong.
MX-SW variant even has a folding stock fitted. http://blog-imgs-53.fc2.com/o/k/l/okla516/20140206031747f2d.jpg

[roberthammer 582]

MX-SW make sense since it got folding stock but the MXM got a fixed stock - Magpul PRS stock

[Mr. Charles 22]

The SPAR-16 Mg variant has wrong selector switch, shows full auto when single fire is selected and vice versa:

 

http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/271724616152143797/9B3C9B1D900B6B9F2220DF7A69D6155AC93E47B9/

 

http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/271724616152143632/35E84601E637D1EA465119AF3C203663AE9D20E1/

[x3kj 1247]

Can not fit the CMR-76 rifle in backpacks even though its 6.5mm just like MXM and both of them are the same size (CMR-76 is slightly smaller even)

Tweaked: The MXM rifle can no longer fit into a backpack

 

[probad 44]

so a switch position bug gets fixed immediately but the glaringly misaligned spar-16s muzzle proxy is considered visually acceptable?

[bars91 956]

so a switch position bug gets fixed immediately but the glaringly misaligned spar-16s muzzle proxy is considered visually acceptable?

 

Pretty much everything about the APEX weapons proxies needs to be realigned. Takes literally couple minutes per weapon. Yet no shits are given even month+ after content pre-release, when this was "found" (by just looking at the models for first 5-10 seconds)

[Grumpy Old Man 3540]

Pretty much everything about the APEX weapons proxies needs to be realigned. Takes literally couple minutes per weapon. Yet no shits are given even month+ after content pre-release, when this was "found" (by just looking at the models for first 5-10 seconds)

 

Sometimes it's mind boggling how stuff gets introduced and ditched within the same moment.

Zeus Fire support 230mm rockets still don't do any damage at all,

rope technology could have a plethora of applications, still it's only being used to slingload stuff.

Then there's that weird "sidegrade" called visual upgrade, gives nice water reflections but still doesn't help walls and objects cast shadows and flares are in a worse state than before, giving off 0 light.

I'm no rendering expert, but this is certainly not how a flashlight works:

http://imgur.com/a/Bvw1l

 

Cheers

[roberthammer 582]

Tweaked: The mass and recoil values were adjusted for the SPAR-17 weapon

changed mass from 200 to 160 , good but not sure about that that new recoil tho

also can you return that original SPAR17 stock like it was before?

[road runner 4344]

Tweaked the recoils but left the off centre proxy muzzle attachments?

Left the top proxy still too far forwards, and looks out of place with anything different from the stock scopes and sights?

5 minutes too long for this to be fixed?

[en3x 209]

Tweaked the recoils but left the off centre proxy muzzle attachments?

Left the top proxy still too far forwards, and looks out of place with anything different from the stock scopes and sights?

5 minutes too long for this to be fixed?

 

Hmm without knowing their schedule and priority list is impossible to say.

 

We should post couple of pictures about the proxy offset.

[road runner 4344]

Hmm without knowing their schedule and priority list is impossible to say.

 

We should post couple of pictures about the proxy offset.

It's already been done, pictures that is,  literally takes 30 seconds to move a proxy, copy and paste that into all the other LODs, 5 minutes is being generous.

The offset muzzle proxy is a glaring issue, and should be a higher priority than making stance adjustments within EDEN.

[graemeshute 218]

It's already been done, pictures that is,  literally takes 30 seconds to move a proxy, copy and paste that into all the other LODs, 5 minutes is being generous.

The offset muzzle proxy is a glaring issue, and should be a higher priority than making stance adjustments within EDEN.

I have to defend Karel and Flip here. My understanding they work on 3Den and not the issues you raised. I believe people are tasked to key things

[road runner 4344]

I have to defend Karel and Flip here. My understanding they work on 3Den and not the issues you raised. I believe people are tasked to key things

Even someone who has basic knowledge of O2 can move this, are you actually saying that of all the technicians BIS has at their disposal, there's only 2 who can move proxies/2 that remain on the APEX project? Not very encouraging then what with all the other issues such as lighting etc to deal with.

 

Send me the p3d, I'll save them a days wages, and do it for free!! ;)

[probad 44]

good to see in an aiming and shooting game the erco sight remains misaligned

priorities guys

[IndeedPete 1038]

The config values of the "cursor" attribute of the SPAR-16s, SPAR-17, and Protector seem to be wrong. They're all classified as "arifle" whereas they should be "mg", "srifle", and "smg". That makes it hard to distinct these weapons' types by script.

 

I wasn't sure if there was a ticket already, so I went ahead and created one: https://feedback.bistudio.com/T119844

[roberthammer 582]

Tweaked: Ballistic performance of the 7.62x39 mm bullets was optimized (increased air friction, decreased penetration)

Tweaked: Muzzle velocity of the SPAR-16S weapon was increased

Tweaked: The Protector, SPAR-16S and SPAR-17 weapons now have proper cursor types

FIxed: The reticle of the ERCO optics was not correctly aligned

Finally some things got sorted out , still have to check it ingame :P

[probad 44]

erco is actually fixed!

patch introduced a significant randomized left-right kick to spar-16s recoil, this isn't right considering the 16s is a heavier weapon with a longer barrel

i mean i can live with it but is it intentional / is this what beta mags do?

[bars91 956]

erco is actually fixed!

patch introduced a significant randomized left-right kick to spar-16s recoil, this isn't right considering the 16s is a heavier weapon with a longer barrel

i mean i can live with it but is it intentional / is this what beta mags do?

 

Nope, IRL mags don't do shit - firing mech reciprication does. It's all cuz "it's a game" and all that jazz...   :rolleyes:

[BooBooLovesAll 2]

Any possible way to fine tune the longer range scope increments? Instead of 100m, possibly 50m or 25m? 

[ineptaphid 6413]

"Tweaked: Ballistic performance of the 7.62x39 mm bullets was optimized (increased air friction, decreased penetration)" 

 

What exactly does this mean? Because I feel 7.62 rounds are not powerful enough as it is-trying to use a marksman rifle like the Mk18 EBR to kill someone from more than a couple of hundred metres will always require more than one shot. From the sound of this they will be even less powerful now.. And it's real life counterpart the Mk14 EBR has an effective range of 800 mtrs, and a max firing range of 4.2kms

[dragon01 902]

Mk18 EBR uses the 7.62x51mm round. The changelog entry basically means they nerfed the AK (which are the ones using 7.62x39mm rounds) to be more realistic. Previously, they were too close in performance to the 7.62x51mm. Remember, the same caliber doesn't mean the same properties, case length matters a lot.

[chortles 263]

What dragon01 said, just like how the ASP-1 Kir's rounds have half the case length of the GM6 Lynx's and the world of difference inherent to that.

[Hans(z) 56]

Hi,

Is ERCO optics really fixed? When I go to VA and fire from 500m bullet fly 1m right of target, so I think BI didn't fix this bug. And where I can find some list of changes in updates?

[roberthammer 582]

Hi,

Is ERCO optics really fixed? When I go to VA and fire from 500m bullet fly 1m right of target, so I think BI didn't fix this bug. And where I can find some list of changes in updates?

Not sure how well it is , i need to check that ingame

 

and those changes you can see here > https://forums.bistudio.com/topic/140837-development-branch-changelog/page-43#entry3077282