KeyCat 131 Posted June 16, 2016 You can do OK with much less than 90 fps...of course more = better. /KC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roshnak 41 Posted June 16, 2016 You can do OK with much less than 90 fps...of course more = better. /KC You can get away with less than 90, but asynchronous time warp will start introducing artifacts, such as those shown in this video. Personally, I'd be more concerned about locomotion. Using vehicles in VR will probably be okay for a lot of people, but I suspect that traditional locomotion with a mouse and keyboard for infantry play is likely to make a majority of users feel pretty sick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kremator 1064 Posted June 16, 2016 The Rift, for instance, has Asynchronous Time Warp that means that even below 90FPS it is buttery smooth! I'd like to be able to play Arma3 natively with the Rift (and I'm sure Vive owners would too!) Need to get a dev in here to make a comment if possible. Playing in full 3D is just an amazing experience.... the game comes alive. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xambo 0 Posted June 25, 2016 As soon as I read Oculus I had to read what's it about. I though it was breaking news that the next instalment will have oculus. I would really like the experience of that even though I know it will not be for the multiplayer. Maybe just the campaign and scenarios. Imagine this with Oculus on. https://youtu.be/KPjAYbs-7iM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
