Arma 3 General Review | Objective Standpoint

[Polymath820 11]

.....

Edited April 13, 2014 by Polymath820
Deleted

[ProfTournesol 956]

Well, a review of which purpose is mostly to underline the flaws (with which i however agree) cannot be called "objective standpoint".

[10t 12]

Breaking news! Saying something is objective doesn't make it so.

[Polymath820 11]

Okay, which part is not "true / factual"? And if you are going to pull the "definition" use a valid source: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/objective

[10t 12]

More news! Something being "true/factual" doesn't make it objective!

Your review is based on your opinion and your personal weightings of the relative values of different features and flaws. It's subjective. Putting "objective" into your title to (I presume) give it an air of authority just distracts from the content and makes you less credible and me less interested.

[Polymath820 11]

.....

Edited April 13, 2014 by Polymath820
Deleted

[Tonci87 163]

Where is the review?

[Westonsammy 1]

Where is the review?

I think someone got a bit intimidated by the comments his review received...

[Bee8190 10]

I have read the review and he has had some good points whether it fited the objective description or not

[Deadfast 43]

Considering the author of this thread decided to delete the original post I don't see the need for this thread to stay open.

Closing.