bearbison 10 Posted July 23, 2015 Unless I am missing something here, why not just use BIS_fnc_typeText? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
austin_medic 109 Posted July 23, 2015 Unless I am missing something here, why not just use BIS_fnc_typeText? They said on the first page I think that it didn't give the desired effect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bearbison 10 Posted July 24, 2015 They said on the first page I think that it didn't give the desired effect. Nah, that was for BIS_fnc_infoText although BIS_fnc_typeText did have a problem not long after release when if I remember correctly they added some other parameters but not had a problem since then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kdk11 1 Posted July 24, 2015 Aye it works now not sure why it didnt the first time. Didnt know about the BIS_fnc_typeText coding but I just remembered about this post from back in either the Alpha or Beta phase and thats why I used it. That BIS_fnc_typeText is a much smaller way of doing it. Either way it is working again so thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
