Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For some reason, when looking at damaged vehicles in first person (either a single gunshot from a 9 mm or actual damage) it turns dark like so:

 

Ft5e0Cl.jpg

 

But in third person:

 

eoOUICm.jpg

 

It also appears darker in first person while manning the vehicle regardless of damage.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be nice for some new AT weapons... Like the good ol' Carl Gustaf ;)
 

I also don't see why the hidden textures for certain uniforms haven't been released as their own uniforms yet? 

Sage nato uniform? Woodland nato uniform? Syndikat combat uniform? These all look great and should be released, whoever made them deserves them to be released. 

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Literally unplayable. The RCWS on every vehicle apart from the Strider doesn't animate properly.

 

For reference, this is how it should animate. Note that the base doesn't move while the turret actually does.

iJnJODB.jpg

 

The following vehicles...

 

2S9 Sochor

Speedboat

Ifrit

MSE-3 Marid

IFV-6c Panther

CRV-6e Bobcat

UGV Stomper

M4 Scorcher

 

...have RCWS's that don't animate properly. The base moves with the turret like so:

kXOZtRL.jpg

 

While we're on the topic, the hatch on the hunter shouldn't turn with the turret.

smcIYmE.jpg

 

Rather it should remain still - along with the RCWS's base, while the RCWS turns.

 

Also, the unarmed Strider has a base which probably shouldn't be there.

rzGvSuY.jpg

 

Please take care of this, I can't unsee it now.

 

EDIT: Also, the FIA Gorgons still have AO for the tools, and the shovel handle is still there.

yuJ1FQY.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone ran over an AI lately?

 

nfSkJOR.jpg

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turrets of every Armored vehicle are don't have any collision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the armed prowler broken in Dev? Can't get in to the front MG gunner seat (shows 2 "gunner" positions selectable - did it used to show "commander"?? Also the actual gunner MG wont fire.

 

Can anyone verify please?

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

V-44X Vehicle Transport is unable to load vehicles in-game any more.  You can still load the vehicles via Eden editor though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Imperator[TFD] said:

V-44X Vehicle Transport is unable to load vehicles in-game any more.  You can still load the vehicles via Eden editor though.

 

i was able to load a jeep, but not the marshal APC or Marid APC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Imperator[TFD] said:

V-44X Vehicle Transport is unable to load vehicles in-game any more.  You can still load the vehicles via Eden editor though.

 

8 minutes ago, fn_Quiksilver said:

 

i was able to load a jeep, but not the marshal APC or Marid APC.

Hm? I can load a Marshal into a V-44 in-game. Speaking of, Marshal with slat armor shouldn't be loaded in V-44. Is this possible with the current game engine?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, POLPOX said:

 

Hm? I can load a Marshal into a V-44 in-game. Speaking of, Marshal with slat armor shouldn't be loaded in V-44. Is this possible with the current game engine?

 

im on 1.81, what version are you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, fn_Quiksilver said:

 

im on 1.81, what version are you?

["Arma 3","Arma3",181,144365,"Development",false,"Windows","x64"]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/25/2018 at 10:05 AM, POLPOX said:

Turrets of every Armored vehicle are don't have any collision.

If you mean the tank cannons, then yeah that's intentional to avoid wonky physx issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, SuicideKing said:

If you mean the tank cannons, then yeah that's intentional to avoid wonky physx issues.

Sad news. Let's hope they find some answer to this problem or we can shoot enemy tank through a wall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, POLPOX said:

Sad news. Let's hope they find some answer to this problem or we can shoot enemy tank through a wall.

Well, it won't happen in Arma 3, that much is confirmed. You can still shoot an enemy tank through a wall though.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, SuicideKing said:

 You can still shoot an enemy tank through a wall though.

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone cares to comment on this (I'm not on DEV) ?

Quote

Tweaked: Fuel capacities of land vehicles are now more consistent across the sandbox

 

Does that mean "reduced" fuel capacity to be in line with the actual scale of official terrains? :hope:

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Radio text is all messed up today. Messages like "2 - Halt2 - Halt" when telling an AI to stop, and his reply looks like "CopyCopy". Custom SideRadio text is also duplicated, but is inserted in the middle of the message, e.g. a message that should read "Alpha, seize the town!" comes out as "Alpha, Seize the "Alpha, Seize the town!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, haleks said:

Anyone cares to comment on this (I'm not on DEV) ?

 

Does that mean "reduced" fuel capacity to be in line with the actual scale of official terrains? :hope:

That would be nice, it has always bugged me that Fuel consumption has no effect on gameplay at all.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, R3vo said:

That would be nice, it has always bugged me that Fuel consumption has no effect on gameplay at all.

2 sided sword, in ArmA II is was hard to drive an UAZ twice across the map....it was empty after 30km. While tanks practically never ran out of fuel.

The key factor here by should be consumption under different circumstaces as a limiting factor, not just less capacity to hide that consumtion all the same across all plattforms.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

with the tweaks of restitution and surfaceFriction in CfgSurfaces can we please get them documented:

https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/CfgSurfaces_Config_Reference#restitution
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/CfgSurfaces_Config_Reference#surfaceFriction

 

 

 

these in cfgWorlds would be also nice to get - preferably with algorithm details:

minObjInTownSquare = 1.4;
minTreesInForestSquare = 3;
minRocksInRockSquare = 2;
minHillsAltitude = 80;
maxHillsAltitude = 450;

https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/CfgWorlds_Config_Reference#M

 

 

 

similar for the map parameters currently tweaked

ptsPerSquareTxt = 500;
ptsPerSquareFor = 15;
ptsPerSquareForEdge = 15;
ptsPerSquareRoad = 6;
ptsPerSquareMainRoad = 6;
ptsPerSquareObj = 15;
ptsPerSquareObjLod1 = 2;
ptsPerSquareForLod1 = 4;
ptsPerSquareForLod2 = 1;
ptsPerSquareRoadSimple = 1;
ptsPerSquareMainRoadSimple = 1;

 

 

what is the cfgWeaponsHandling/Recoil/kickVisual tweak about? and the tweaks in cfgCameraShake (would be great to see both root classes also documented/get the engine source comments):

 

m4i6dVh.png

 

thank you

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, R3vo said:

That would be nice, it has always bugged me that Fuel consumption has no effect on gameplay at all.

I want a script command that adjusts fuel consumption. If we can RTB to refuel after every each of CAS Mission, this would be nice.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, haleks said:

Does that mean "reduced" fuel capacity to be in line with the actual scale of official terrains? :hope:

1

We tweaked the fuel capacities while reworking the tank PhysX configuration. This is bringing other vehicles in line. Because for whatever reason previously the fuel played only a little role we couldn't change it as much as we'd like to. But in a long mil-sim scenario (talking about e.g. 2-3h sessions) you should definitely feel the difference.
 

7 hours ago, .kju said:

with the tweaks of restitution and surfaceFriction in CfgSurfaces can we please get them documented:

https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/CfgSurfaces_Config_Reference#restitution
https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/CfgSurfaces_Config_Reference#surfaceFriction

1

First is basically a bounciness of the surface (how much will PhysX objects bounce off the surface). The second one is for the wheeled vehicles and it's basically the surf. part of http://docs.nvidia.com/gameworks/content/gameworkslibrary/physx/guide/Manual/Vehicles.html#tire-friction-on-drivable-surfaces (with the fact that A3 doesn't use different tire sets at all)
 

7 hours ago, .kju said:

these in cfgWorlds would be also nice to get - preferably with algorithm details:

https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/CfgWorlds_Config_Reference#M

 

similar for the map parameters currently tweake

2

I'm sorry, I can't help with that atm.

 

7 hours ago, .kju said:

what is the cfgWeaponsHandling/Recoil/kickVisual tweak about? and the tweaks in cfgCameraShake (would be great to see both root classes also documented/get the engine source comments):

 

m4i6dVh.png

 

Probably just a part of it has got into the dev-branch. The work is only at the start. It's more of an investigation of what all is possible with what we currently have. The overall goal will be to add a better feeling to the weapon fire. As usual - it may fail, nothing's confirmed, everything's possible.

This class affects all camera shakes in the game (weapon fire, nearby fire, nearby explosion, hit, g-forces, damaged vehicle (you know this from AFM helicopters)). Caliber coef., for example, say how much the shake will be affected by weapon caliber. But since you can configure shake per each ammo this isn't needed if you're ready to do the work.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, oukej said:

We tweaked the fuel capacities while reworking the tank PhysX configuration. This is bringing other vehicles in line. Because for whatever reason previously the fuel played only a little role we couldn't change it as much as we'd like to. But in a long mil-sim scenario (talking about e.g. 2-3h sessions) you should definitely feel the difference.

It would be nice to have a command to influence fuel consumption.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×