cosmic10r 2320 Posted November 8, 2014 Hi, i second barber who posted before me, does anybody have a link to download the mission?I can' t download it from the first post. Thanks in advance. http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=19801 As far as I know this is the latest... have fun... don't know how many of my arma hours have been in this testing settings lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tsark 12 Posted November 9, 2014 Thanks, i will try it and will then post my results along with my computer's configuration in either this thread or the "will my pc run this" thread. ---------- Post added at 16:19 ---------- Previous post was at 15:47 ---------- OK here are my results: Stratis: 48 fps Altis: 44 fps My Settings: everything set to as high as it can be except: Resolution: 1920x1080 Sampling: 100 per cent View Distance: 3800 Object view distance: 2800 Shadow: 200 Bloom,radial blur, rotation blur, depth of field, sharpen filter set to 100 (default) Vsync disabled. My rig: Motherboard: Gigabyte z97x soc force Cpu: Intel i7 4790k Gpu Gigabyte 780ti Ghz edition Ram: 16gb Gskill 2400 mhz (cas10 iirc) SSD: Samsung 840 evo 250gb Psu: Corsair tx850w Do these results seem ok to you guys with regard to my settings and config? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
law-giver 189 Posted November 10, 2014 (edited) Do these results seem ok to you guys with regard to my settings and config? Thought i'd give mine a bash. Here's my current setup and results. Stratis: 49 fps Altis: 46 fps My Settings: everything set to ultra, shadows on very high Resolution: 1920x1080 Sampling: 100 per cent View Distance: 3000 Object view distance: 2000 Shadow: 100 Bloom, radial blur, rotation blur, depth of field, sharpen filter set to 100 (default) Vsync enabled. FSAA 8X. Hardware below. ;) Edited November 10, 2014 by Law-Giver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pr0ph3tswe 1 Posted November 11, 2014 (edited) altis: 51 fps ultra 1080p 3000, 1750, 200 view distance vsync off 8xAA,, AF ultra FXAA ultra 50 sharpness, 20 bloom, all the blur stuff off sweetfx enabled specs in sig Edited November 11, 2014 by pr0ph3tSWE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grzegorz 33 Posted November 11, 2014 (edited) Altis - 54 FPS Game ver 1.34128075 My settings: http://cloud-4.steampowered.com/ugc/44236317023661945/0FBF1B7661FB7E7D23E36903FF15428A73AAE1A6/ http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/44236317023663710/203D0A015337A51A6E592E46471996B909ED988F/ http://cloud-4.steampowered.com/ugc/44236317023665466/CAD6E2B567375D30E1B3C71E721892B11C42DB91/ Startup options only -nosplash -nopause -skipIntro -world=empty. System Spec: CPU - i5 3570K@4.2, SilentiumPC Fortis HE1225, Mobo - MSI Z77A-GD55, Mem - Kingston HyperX DDR3 2x4096MB 1600MHz CL9 BOX, GPU - Gigabyte Radeon HD 7870 OC 2GB, LG W2220P - 1680:1050 16:10, HDD - SSD-Plextor PX-128M5S, WDC WD6400AAKS, DVD - Lite-On iHAS122-18, PSU - XFX Black Edition XTR 550W, Case - Silentium PC Gladius 400 Pure Black. Audio - Asus Xonar DX, Superlux HD668B. Win7 64bit, GPU driver AMD Catalyst 14.11.1 Beta Edited November 11, 2014 by grzegorz Update Sys Spec Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pr0ph3tswe 1 Posted November 28, 2014 altis: 51 fpsultra 1080p 3000, 1750, 200 view distance vsync off 8xAA,, AF ultra FXAA ultra 50 sharpness, 20 bloom, all the blur stuff off sweetfx enabled specs in sig upgraded to 16gb 2666mhz ram and asus rog swift same settings but no sweetfx, 100 sharpness and 2560x1440 gave me 52 fps on altis bench, guess i need to squeeze some more out of the cpu :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
niktator 10 Posted January 5, 2015 I´ll see into it. Any ETA or progress information? Got some 2nd GTX 970 and want to bench if it`s worth it - or if I should stick at one ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pr0ph3tswe 1 Posted January 6, 2015 Any ETA or progress information? Got some 2nd GTX 970 and want to bench if it`s worth it - or if I should stick at one ;) can tell you that a second 970 won't do you much good in arma unless you play in 4k even without benchmark :) other games it rocks in though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
niktator 10 Posted January 10, 2015 can tell you that a second 970 won't do you much good in arma unless you play in 4k even without benchmark :) other games it rocks in though Well, I got a normal full hd screen - but rendering at 200% is about that, what i want to do. looks so awesome, if render is at 200%. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
domokun 515 Posted January 15, 2015 Stratis: 51 fps Altis: 51 fps Video settings My Settings: everything set to Ultra (inc. Shadows) except PiP which is disabled Resolution: 1920x1200 Sampling: 100 per cent View Distance: 2700 Object view distance: 1601 Shadow: 100 Bloom, radial blur, rotation blur, depth of field, sharpen filter set to 100 (default) Vsync disabled. FSAA 2X Hardware CPU: Core i5-3570k @ 4.3Ghz GPU: Radeon 7870 @ +7%/1100MHz/1500MHz RAM: 8 GB @ 1648 Mhz SSD: Intel 730 480 GB If I were building a new rig tomorrow I'd opt for i5-4690K & GTX 970 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loopdk 92 Posted February 19, 2015 (edited) Stratis: 51 fps Altis: 51 fps Video settings My Settings: custom(all max) Resolution: 1920x1200 Sampling: 120 per cent View Distance: 3300 Object view distance: 1871 Shadow: 100 Bloom, radial blur, rotation blur, depth of field, sharpen filter set to 100 (default) FSAA 8X ATOC All Tress +Grass PPAA FXAA Ultra ANISO FILTERING Ultra AO HDAD High CAUSTICS Enablet http://peecee.dk/uploads/022015/General1.jpg (169 kB) http://peecee.dk/uploads/022015/Display11.jpg (160 kB) http://peecee.dk/uploads/022015/aa1.jpg (168 kB) Hardware CPU: Core i5-4690k @ 5000Ghz GPU: MSI Gaming 780TI SLI with standart bus RAM: 16 GB @ 2666 Mhz SSD: Samsung EVO 500GB Edited February 19, 2015 by loopdk Type error Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
St. Jimmy 272 Posted August 28, 2015 Anyone getting pretty interesting result with HDD vs SSD? The thing is at the very beginning those Hunters don't move at the start when I'm playing from SSD. They move EVERYTIME when I play from HDD. Anyone have any idea why that's even possible? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greenfist 1863 Posted August 28, 2015 Anyone getting pretty interesting result with HDD vs SSD? The thing is at the very beginning those Hunters don't move at the start when I'm playing from SSD. They move EVERYTIME when I play from HDD. Anyone have any idea why that's even possible? I don't think that's even possible. Might be just very bad luck. There isn't even any code that controls them, only a couple of normal waypoints. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
domiac 10 Posted October 17, 2015 Anyone getting pretty interesting result with HDD vs SSD? The thing is at the very beginning those Hunters don't move at the start when I'm playing from SSD. They move EVERYTIME when I play from HDD. Anyone have any idea why that's even possible? To my knowledge this is very much possible. The reason is that Arma 3 simulation is not deterministic. Each decision that units do have certain amount of randomness. Therefore if one wants to do as comparable benchmark as possible, you cannot run simulation on any unit as the course of simulation is different on different machines, even on the same machine based on the time you run it. With some planning you can get reasonably deterministic behaviour even with units but really cannot guarantee it. Just open editor (or script the whole thing if you will) and add bunch of units from two factions close to each other and you'll see how they battle each other. However, they way how they battle and the outcome too may wary on each run. I'd guess that most accurate benchmark would not involve units doing their own decisions, or for each unit call "enableSimulation false;", that makes unit static but CPU and GPU work as identical as possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jumpinghubert 48 Posted December 2, 2015 Big step back in performance with the 1.54 patch. From 51fps two years ago to the lowest result ever: 42fps with lots of stutter still in second run. Isn´t it the wrong place for a benchmark, user missions? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
