best2nd 10 Posted October 20, 2012 Someone "lied" to you... I can reload the Konkurs in 5 -10 seconds. The way to do it is to have at least one Konkurs missile on you. I usually have 3 (max is 4), so I don't have to worry about resupply. Once you fire the missile you just have to turn out and load the missile by using ACE interact... So 60 second's is WAY too long! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoRailgunner 0 Posted October 20, 2012 Thank you very much!! Btw doesn't the AT-5 Sprandel /"Konkurs" has some weight (~15kg?) + bulkiness so its highly unlike that one can use it in a very gamey way like adding them to gear/backpack and using them very fast as crew/loader in a vehicle (with small hatches)? Maybe this ammo/shell gear+backpack abuse for crew units isn't only a oversight by RHS but also from ACE devs.... ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xeno 234 Posted October 20, 2012 Question: Is there a specific reason that none of your configs are binarized ? Xeno Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
papanowel 120 Posted October 20, 2012 Great news, thanks for the update. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
best2nd 10 Posted October 20, 2012 Question: Is there a specific reason that none of your configs are binarized ?Xeno If you look closely you will find config.big Thank you very much!! Btw doesn't the AT-5 Sprandel /"Konkurs" has some weight (~15kg?) + bulkiness so its highly unlike that one can use it in a very gamey way like adding them to gear/backpack and using them very fast as crew/loader in a vehicle (with small hatches)? Maybe this ammo/shell gear+backpack abuse for crew units isn't only a oversight by RHS but also from ACE devs.... ;) CSWDM is not supported by AFRF... That brings up a question... Will adding CSWDM support force ACE dependency? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonci87 163 Posted October 20, 2012 I also think that 60 seconds is a little bit to long. 30 would be better, and off to some playtesting, YAY. EDIT: Download page down? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bagram 10 Posted October 20, 2012 Good news! please add a download to SixUpdater. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted October 21, 2012 I'm SCDT McDonald and this is still my favourite thread in the forums. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonci87 163 Posted October 21, 2012 I noticed that the aim in the armored vehicels is a little bit off. T-80 for example: The true aiming point for the gunner is indeed a little above the arrow, the same applies for BMP and other vehicels. It is never really centered Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonci87 163 Posted October 21, 2012 Vehicle Bugs: Everything tested at 2000m ALL your guided missiles are flying way to fast! Example 9m11 RL: 186m/s -> ca. 10s for 2000m Your Mod: 2000m in under 4 seconds! That means aproximately 600 m/s! Correct figutes for all missiles 9K11 Maljutka as used in BMD1,BMP1: 115m/s 9M111 as used in BMD2,BMP1P: 186m/s 9K133 as used in BMD2M: 200m/s 9M112M as used in T-80: 400m/s BMD 1: 9K11 Missiles fly above the aiming cross and are therefore hard to control. Is it intended that the missile becomes VERY unstable after ca. 1500m? BMD 1R: Missiles have almost no ballistic curve BMD2: Spot on! BMD2M: Reticels not aligned properly, gun doesnt zero properly, shots always land short (ACE). Missiles land short too because of the misaligned reticle BMP1 all models: Missiles are not centered, fly way above the target, loose flight stability after 1500m BMP2 all models: No gun zeroing available BMP2 (E): Missiles fly a little bit above the arrow. T80 all models: Reticels (normal and magnified) completely misaligned with each other and in general. ACE Tank FCS doesn´t zero the gun, manual input with PageUP/DOWN is the only method to zero the gun. Shell types have different ballistic curves, 3OF26 is flying much further than the other shells. Impossible to hit anything at 2k because of misaligned reticels. T80A,T80B, T80BK, T80BV,T80BVK: Missile misaligned with reticle. Missile has no enigne effects making it very hard to spot and control I would be very glad if these few problems could be fixed :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted October 21, 2012 Vehicle Bugs:Everything tested at 2000m ALL your guided missiles are flying way to fast! Example 9m11 RL: 186m/s -> ca. 10s for 2000m Your Mod: 2000m in under 4 seconds! That means aproximately 600 m/s! Correct figutes for all missiles 9K11 Maljutka as used in BMD1,BMP1: 115m/s 9M111 as used in BMD2,BMP1P: 186m/s 9K133 as used in BMD2M: 200m/s 9M112M as used in T-80: 400m/s BMD 1: 9K11 Missiles fly above the aiming cross and are therefore hard to control. Is it intended that the missile becomes VERY unstable after ca. 1500m? BMD 1R: Missiles have almost no ballistic curve BMD2: Spot on! BMD2M: Reticels not aligned properly, gun doesnt zero properly, shots always land short (ACE). Missiles land short too because of the misaligned reticle BMP1 all models: Missiles are not centered, fly way above the target, loose flight stability after 1500m BMP2 all models: No gun zeroing available BMP2 (E): Missiles fly a little bit above the arrow. T80 all models: Reticels (normal and magnified) completely misaligned with each other and in general. ACE Tank FCS doesn´t zero the gun, manual input with PageUP/DOWN is the only method to zero the gun. Shell types have different ballistic curves, 3OF26 is flying much further than the other shells. Impossible to hit anything at 2k because of misaligned reticels. T80A,T80B, T80BK, T80BV,T80BVK: Missile misaligned with reticle. Missile has no enigne effects making it very hard to spot and control I would be very glad if these few problems could be fixed :) thank you for the report. In the case of misalignment problems, could you please also test the same without ACE running? See if the same misalignment happens? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xeno 234 Posted October 21, 2012 If you look closely you will find config.big Ah, got it. Config.cpp and all include files are also in the pbo files beside config.bin (extract pbo removes it during extraction). Xeno Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted October 21, 2012 FORGOTTEN FEW (AFRF EDITION) King Nothing and Red Hammer Studios have teamed up to bring you an AFRF-only version of his famous Forgotten Few SP/MP dynamic campaign! Make sure to grab it from our downloads section! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kotov12345 10 Posted October 21, 2012 If I able to do programming and wanted create mod I'd rather create separate complete mod with fixed errors based on tickets in dev heaven than create some appendix to full of bugs addons which suffering updates every week.Look example of dayz. People real missing addons where you can actually feel weapons and its usage.Go to dev heaven check out tickets and you can see what people want :) Good luck :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted October 21, 2012 If I able to do programming and wanted create mod I'd rather create separate complete mod with fixed errors based on tickets in dev heaven than create some appendix to full of bugs addons which suffering updates every week.Look example of dayz.People real missing addons where you can actually feel weapons and its usage.Go to dev heaven check out tickets and you can see what people want :) Good luck :) ????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jastreb 69 Posted October 22, 2012 If I able to do programming and wanted create mod I'd rather create separate complete mod with fixed errors based on tickets in dev heaven than create some appendix to full of bugs addons which suffering updates every week.Look example of dayz.People real missing addons where you can actually feel weapons and its usage.Go to dev heaven check out tickets and you can see what people want :) Good luck :) Id say even Google Translate would get confused here. Superb models lads very fine work. Bugs are there so they can be fixed, Tonci87 made a great report. Looking forward for the fixes. Cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ffur2007slx2_5 11 Posted October 22, 2012 Wow, nice job, keep updating RHS! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonci87 163 Posted October 22, 2012 thank you for the report. In the case of misalignment problems, could you please also test the same without ACE running? See if the same misalignment happens? Will do that later today. BTW: Screen Res is 1920x1200 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
megazogg 14 Posted October 22, 2012 Thank you RHS team for another update! The quality of infantry models of AFRF is overwhelming. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted October 22, 2012 Will do that later today.BTW: Screen Res is 1920x1200 already doublechecked, problems are also present in vanilla. Will investigate for a hotfix. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
markb50k 1 Posted October 22, 2012 I'd like to report an issue in the config. In rhs_c_heavyweapons\rhs_weap_cannon.hpp class CannonCore { class Mode_FullAuto; }; by doing this you are removing the inheritance of CannonCore to the Default class; If it isnt fixed by some PBO later on in the load order this could cause some issues with all cannon type weapons.. Recommendation: change this reference to: class CannonCore; And then place your Mode_FullAuto reference up in the rhs_c_heavyweapons\cfgWeapons.h file: class Mode_FullAuto; class cfgWeapons { class SmokeLauncher; #include "rhs_weap_smoke.hpp" #include "rhs_weap_mgun.hpp" #include "rhs_weap_cannon.hpp" #include "rhs_weap_mortar.hpp" #include "rhs_weap_launcher.hpp" }; Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flv*venom* 83 Posted October 22, 2012 Verrrrry nice update! just two questions: a.) would it be possible to add a few more UAZ / Urals in a future patch? like the UAZ w. SPG9 and the BM21 or Ural w. ZU23 ? (just asking if they are on your todo list. :) ) b.) since, from what I read, you consider a 'hotfix' could you also please add a rifleman without the facemask please? You guys rock! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted October 23, 2012 Verrrrry nice update!just two questions: a.) would it be possible to add a few more UAZ / Urals in a future patch? like the UAZ w. SPG9 and the BM21 or Ural w. ZU23 ? (just asking if they are on your todo list. :) ) b.) since, from what I read, you consider a 'hotfix' could you also please add a rifleman without the facemask please? You guys rock! a) possibly, but i havnt seen any spg9 Uazs on pictures lately b) not anymore. Read below! ---------- Post added at 00:43 ---------- Previous post was at 00:42 ---------- VERSION 0.1.6.1360 RELEASED! A few days after the release of 0.1.5 we decided to follow up with version 0.1.6 which fixes some important issues noticed by our fans. We felt that these were critical not to delay until 0.2. Here you can see the changelog: [#] Fixed URAL and UAZ decal MP multiplicity bug [#] Fixed T-80 gunner sights [#] Fixed BMD-2M gunner sights [^] ATGM flight velocity now more realistic [^] Heavyweapons inheritance improved [^] BMP-2 2A42 now can be zeroed [^] BMP PKT boxes now hold 2×1000 rounds [^] 9M113 ATGMs reset to reload at 30s Head over to our downloads page to grab a fresh copy or if you just downloaded 0.1.5 then get the small patch! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fingolfin 1972 Posted October 23, 2012 That was quick. Thank you very much! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonci87 163 Posted October 23, 2012 Wow quick indeed. I´ll test this when I get home from work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites