ARMA 2: OA beta build 95168 (1.62 MP build)

[Dwarden 1124]

WARNING: this build is not compatible with 1.60 and 1.61 version of A2: OA/A2: CO!

http://www.arma2.com/beta-patch.php

mirror: http://www.gamefront.com/files/22007838/ARMA2_OA_Build_95168.zip

* fixed some crashes and MP issues (it means to stabilize MP we need change major version to 1.62)

* fixed bad playername issue

+ beta in Sync with 1.62 RC1 candidate for these who don't want install 1.62 RC1

+new BE installers included within

+ some other fixes

BattlEye status: ... SUPPORTED ...

Edited July 19, 2012 by Dwarden

[HawkGB 1]

Cheers!

[teach 1]

Nice!

[hellfire257 3]

How does this affect 1.61? Will it be skipped?

[-GLT-Sarge 10]

thread title wrong because beta page says 95168?

[bristow 1]

Is anyone else getting jittery visuals just by turning left to right? Its unplayable in this state.

[s3mp3rfi 10]

I noticed over the last couple betas that all the hard work that went into movement interpolation over distances has regressed back to pre 1.60 levels. Anyone else notice this?

[metalcraze 290]

I had soldiers warping a bit in singleplayer in 1.61 but I can't reproduce it reliably.

[ast65 10]

Is anyone else getting jittery visuals just by turning left to right? Its unplayable in this state.

I noticed over the last couple betas that all the hard work that went into movement interpolation over distances has regressed back to pre 1.60 levels. Anyone else notice this?

...not at all, nice patch, superior IQ :)

[UGLY58 10]

WARNING: this build is not compatible with 1.60 and 1.61 version of A2: OA/A2: CO!

I have 1.60 (never been near the RC`s) and this Beta seems to run fine ?

[Smurf 12]

I have 1.60 (never been near the RC`s) and this Beta seems to run fine ?

You can´t join a 1.60 or 1.61 server....

[PELHAM 10]

You can get bad performance if you install an RC and a beta. I noticed my installed game version (RC) was the same number as the beta, deleted the beta folder and it was ok after that. Had lag and jittery visuals turning etc, with them both together. I would just use the beta patch not the RC. I'm having to reinstall as I did not realise there was no rollback from the RC's.

[UGLY58 10]

You can´t join a 1.60 or 1.61 server....

Thaaaaats what he means, thanks :)

[Freeborne 10]

Can you please clarify what's going on with the 1.62 beta.

I installed the latest beta's as they are made available on Six Launcher (to play DayZ).

Since 1.62 (95168+) I have not been able to play vanilla ARMA2 (1.60) as I just get a crash to desktop after loading a mission file. Several other people reported the exact same problem to me, on different servers, playing different missions.

The beta is NOT optional, to play DayZ.

Does this mean every DayZ player can no longer play vanilla ARMA2?

[.kju 3240]

Freeborne 1.61+ needs a different battleye dll. BE 1.60 and 1.61/1.62 RC are NOT compatible

Read: http://www.battleye.com/download.html

[Lokyi 10]

Freeborne 1.61+ needs a different battleye dll. BE 1.60 and 1.61/1.62 RC are NOT compatible

Read: http://www.battleye.com/download.html

Lol another unrequired fsck up. Seriously why didn't BI wait a week before release? It's not like anything was actually broken.

[domokun 515]

Lol another unrequired fsck up. Seriously why didn't BI wait a week before release? It's not like anything was actually broken.

BI have been testing beta patches for 6 months now. It was time enough for them to draw a line in the sand. An week extra become another week and then another and another... What people fail to realise that in the development of complex software, nothing is ever perfect. As a result, someone, somewhere has to draw a line and "That's good enough for a release". That's what was done. Honestly I'm also experiencing a loss of performance but at the same time, check-out the changelog to realise all the bugfixes and new features that have been added...