stk2008 14 Posted March 1, 2013 I have Win7 64bit Q6700 ATI 4890 1GB I aint expecting much from this old dog :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 1, 2013 I haveWin7 64bit Q6700 ATI 4890 1GB I aint expecting much from this old dog :( Don't worry little dude, the 4890 is a beast of a GPU - I completed ArmA II SP in 2009 & played in MP for a year with it on High settings & 3 km VD. You should expect Medium spec in ArmA III with no AA. At least on Altis, view distance will be the deciding factor, since there are a lot of villages/buildings there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stk2008 14 Posted March 1, 2013 Yeah VD is CPU dependent so I normally run that at 2500m I may even consider overclocking me Q6700 any ways :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
triplea 10 Posted March 1, 2013 AMD Phenom II X4 955BE@3,6Ghz Overclocked GTX560Ti 12GBs of RAM Will install on an SSD Hmmm, I wonder how it's gonna work:confused: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leon86 13 Posted March 1, 2013 I haveWin7 64bit Q6700 ATI 4890 1GB I aint expecting much from this old dog :( Dunno, that cpu gets pretty close to the phenomII in the recommended system and easily beats the minimum. Gpu is also well over minimum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stk2008 14 Posted March 1, 2013 as much as I love BIS there system specs have never been very accurate though LOL :P Dunno, that cpu gets pretty close to the phenomII in the recommended system and easily beats the minimum. Gpu is also well over minimum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeMeSiS 11 Posted March 1, 2013 as much as I love BIS there system specs have never been very accurate though LOL :P Yeah, I was pretty amazed to see that my ~3 year old system (barely) meets the recommended specs. I expect to be able to play at medium-low settings @1920x1080. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nikiforos 450 Posted March 1, 2013 I have low expectations settings just to protect myself from dissapointment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stk2008 14 Posted March 1, 2013 I have low expectations settings just to protect myself from dissapointment. Well if yours wont run it (whice it should rather well the 2500k are a nice chip) then I am stuffed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drakedaeron 13 Posted March 1, 2013 Iroquois Pliskin : What is you'r setting for ArmA 2 ? My PC cry when action is here. (Sorry for my english i'm french :3) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Iroquois Pliskin :What is you'r setting for ArmA 2 ? My PC cry when action is here. (Sorry for my english i'm french :3) I'll update this post in 10 min with settings and my config, which is a laptop. Settings: 1) Texture detail - High/Video Mem - Default, AF - High, ATOC - All trees & Grass, Terrain & Object detail - Normal, Shadows - High, HDR Quality - Normal, Post-Proc Effects - Low. 2) PPAA - Disabled, AA - Disabled & V-Sync - Disabled. Playing @ 1366x768 the Op Arrowhead Benchmark 08 gives an avg 25 FPS, while in MP I get about 25-32. I'll have to test the performance while Fraps'ing. Asus S46C w/ Intel i5-3317U (Yes, that's an Ultra-Low Voltage CPU), 4 GB RAM, Nvidia GT 635M, Win 8. http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i5-3317U-Notebook-Processor.74464.0.html http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GT-635M.66964.0.html Needed an ultrabook with a dedicated GPU & an optical drive - so there it is. :p Edited March 1, 2013 by Iroquois Pliskin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
linuxmaster9 101 Posted March 1, 2013 im running ArmA II OA with an AMD FX 8120 (8-core/4-modules) and a Sapphire HD 7970 stock with 8GB of 1600Mhz RAM. I do notice a lag for a few seconds before it picks back up. I noticed that my CPU seems to chug from time to time with the game but who knows. Hopefully, the alpha will be coded right to support multicore CPUs especially the AMD side. My CPU has a lot of Muscle to work with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drakedaeron 13 Posted March 1, 2013 Yes, it's a big black point of ArmA II. Quad Core processor is not use be game. It's very bad for a new pc who is "not powerfull", its is very very very bad who this PC have a bad GPU. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted March 1, 2013 im running ArmA II OA with an AMD FX 8120 (8-core/4-modules) and a Sapphire HD 7970 stock with 8GB of 1600Mhz RAM. I do notice a lag for a few seconds before it picks back up. I noticed that my CPU seems to chug from time to time with the game but who knows. Hopefully, the alpha will be coded right to support multicore CPUs especially the AMD side. My CPU has a lot of Muscle to work with. Could be your mechanical HDD caching, if you have one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
linuxmaster9 101 Posted March 1, 2013 Could be your mechanical HDD caching, if you have one. Well, I am in the process of migrating the install to my new SSD I added today. Hopefully that will fix it. Lots of people claim AMD is crap but they have not given me any problems so far and I have had AMD since socket 939. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chinkslayer 10 Posted March 1, 2013 So based off of the Alpha Specs they have would a ATI Radeon HD 6770 run this game? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maddogx 13 Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) So based off of the Alpha Specs they have would a ATI Radeon HD 6770 run this game? Not on its own, but if you build a sufficiently equipped PC around that card, sure. ;) EDIT: Jokes aside, I will be testing the alpha on two systems and posting info on performance and optimal settings. The first system is the one in my sig, the second one is somewhat less powerful: - AMD Phenom II X4 960T - NVidia GTX 550 Ti - 4GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM - 32bit Windows 7 If you don't want to risk buying the game before you know how it will run, wait for Tuesday evening. :D Edited March 1, 2013 by MadDogX Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chinkslayer 10 Posted March 1, 2013 Ha ha i have a M5a97 motherboard FX4170 Quad core 4.2GHz processor 1tb hdd 8gb DDR3 ram and ATI Radeon 6770 graphics card win7 ultimate 64bit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maddogx 13 Posted March 1, 2013 Ha ha i have a M5a97 motherboard FX4170 Quad core 4.2GHz processor 1tb hdd 8gb DDR3 ram and ATI Radeon 6770 graphics card win7 ultimate 64bit It will definitely run the game, but it's hard to say how well at this point. The recommended specs posted by BI seem very... optimistic. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chinkslayer 10 Posted March 1, 2013 thanks definatly getting this then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drakedaeron 13 Posted March 2, 2013 I think, if Bohemia put this recommanded setting, I think that Bohemia in planned of better optimized their Game so that he turns on quite machines, little in as the big licenses, as Battlefield to quote only he. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leopardi 0 Posted March 2, 2013 It will definitely run the game, but it's hard to say how well at this point. The recommended specs posted by BI seem very... optimistic. :) Crawling in sub-20FPS in arma 2 wasteland with my specs I don't have high hopes for anyone with an AMD processor. Unless they play singleplayer or super light max. 10 player missions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drakedaeron 13 Posted March 2, 2013 OS Windows Vista SP2 Windows 7 SP1 PROCESSOR Intel Core i5-2300 AMD Phenom II X4 940 GRAPHICS Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 AMD Radeon HD 7750 GPU MEMORY 1 GB DirectX® 11 RAM 4 GB HARD DRIVE 25 GB free space HARD DRIVE (ALPHA) 20 GB free space AUDIO DirectX® compatible soundcard OTHER Internet connection and free Steam account to activate I laught of new recommanded config. It's dead for me i think.... I hate my GT540M Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CK3 10 Posted March 2, 2013 Windows 8 better work :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
k3lt 3 Posted March 2, 2013 Any idea if i will be able to play with anything higher than Low visual settings? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
